Published in:
Open Access
22-09-2022 | Oseltamivir | Original Paper
Cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to primary care for influenza-like-illness: economic evaluation alongside the randomised controlled ALIC4E trial in 15 European countries
Authors:
Xiao Li, Joke Bilcke, Alike W. van der Velden, Robin Bruyndonckx, Samuel Coenen, Emily Bongard, Muirrean de Paor, Slawomir Chlabicz, Maciek Godycki-Cwirko, Nick Francis, Rune Aabenhus, Heiner C. Bucher, Annelies Colliers, An De Sutter, Ana Garcia-Sangenis, Dominik Glinz, Nicolay J. Harbin, Katarzyna Kosiek, Morten Lindbæk, Christos Lionis, Carl Llor, Réka Mikó-Pauer, Ruta Radzeviciene Jurgute, Bohumil Seifert, Pär-Daniel Sundvall, Pia Touboul Lundgren, Nikolaos Tsakountakis, Theo J. Verheij, Herman Goossens, Christopher C. Butler, Philippe Beutels, ALIC4Etrial investigators
Published in:
The European Journal of Health Economics
|
Issue 6/2023
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
Oseltamivir is usually not often prescribed (or reimbursed) for non-high-risk patients consulting for influenza-like-illness (ILI) in primary care in Europe. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to usual primary care in adults/adolescents (13 years +) and children with ILI during seasonal influenza epidemics, using data collected in an open-label, multi-season, randomised controlled trial of oseltamivir in 15 European countries.
Methods
Direct and indirect cost estimates were based on patient reported resource use and official country-specific unit costs. Health-Related Quality of Life was assessed by EQ-5D questionnaires. Costs and quality adjusted life-years (QALY) were bootstrapped (N = 10,000) to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), from both the healthcare payers’ and the societal perspectives, with uncertainty expressed through probabilistic sensitivity analysis and expected value for perfect information (EVPI) analysis. Additionally, scenario (self-reported spending), comorbidities subgroup and country-specific analyses were performed.
Results
The healthcare payers’ expected ICERs of oseltamivir were €22,459 per QALY gained in adults/adolescents and €13,001 in children. From the societal perspective, oseltamivir was cost-saving in adults/adolescents, but the ICER is €8,344 in children. Large uncertainties were observed in subgroups with comorbidities, especially for children. The expected ICERs and extent of decision uncertainty varied between countries (EVPI ranged €1–€35 per patient).
Conclusion
Adding oseltamivir to primary usual care in Europe is likely to be cost-effective for treating adults/adolescents and children with ILI from the healthcare payers’ perspective (if willingness-to-pay per QALY gained > €22,459) and cost-saving in adults/adolescents from a societal perspective.