Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Orthosis | Research

The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation

Authors: Hadeel R. Bakhsh, Nilüfer Kablan, Walaa Alammar, Yaşar Tatar, Giorgio Ferriero

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Client Satisfaction with Devices (CSD) module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey is an extensively used questionnaire that measures patients’ satisfaction with orthosis and prosthesis. However, the validated version for Arabic speakers (CSD-Ar) is only applicable for orthosis users.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the CSD-Ar for prosthetics users.

Methods

The study used a convenience sample of prosthesis users from Saudi Arabia and Turkey (N = 183), who completed the CSD-Ar. The collected data were analysed using Rasch analysis to evaluate item fit, reliability indices, item difficulty, local item dependency, and differential item functioning (DIF) using WINSTEPS version 4.6.1.

Results

Based on the analysis, the four-response Likert-scale was acceptable, as shown by the category functioning test, All eight items did achieve a fit to the Rasch Model [(infit) and (outfit) mean-square 0.75 to 1.3]. Person separation reliability was 0.76, and item separation reliability was 0.94. A principal component analysis (PCA) showed satisfactory unidimensionality and no local item dependency. The DIF analysis showed no notable dependency among items on participant characteristics in terms of age, gender, duration of use, country, and level of amputation.

Conclusion

This study contributes to the confidence of using CSD-Ar to evaluate users’ satisfaction with different prostheses, affirming the need for further refinement of the quality of the outcome measure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Luthi F, Praz C, Léger B, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the French version of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales—revised (TAPES-R). PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0229084.CrossRef Luthi F, Praz C, Léger B, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the French version of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales—revised (TAPES-R). PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0229084.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Funk L, Thiessen D, Wright V, et al. Reliability and validity of the lower limb function questionnaire when completed by young adult orthotic and prosthetic device users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:262–71.CrossRef Funk L, Thiessen D, Wright V, et al. Reliability and validity of the lower limb function questionnaire when completed by young adult orthotic and prosthetic device users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:262–71.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Giordano A, et al. The minimal clinically-important difference of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire-Mobility Scale in subjects undergoing lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation training. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56:82–7.CrossRef Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Giordano A, et al. The minimal clinically-important difference of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire-Mobility Scale in subjects undergoing lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation training. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56:82–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Resnik L, Borgia M, Silver B, et al. Systematic review of measures of impairment and activity limitation for persons with upper limb trauma and amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:1863-1892. e1814.CrossRef Resnik L, Borgia M, Silver B, et al. Systematic review of measures of impairment and activity limitation for persons with upper limb trauma and amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:1863-1892. e1814.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Heinemann AW, Bode RK, O’Reilly C. Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003;27:191–206.CrossRef Heinemann AW, Bode RK, O’Reilly C. Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003;27:191–206.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jarl G, Heinemann AW, Lindner HY, et al. Cross-cultural validity and differential item functioning of the orthotics and prosthetics Users’ survey with Swedish and United States users of lower-limb prosthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1615–26.CrossRef Jarl G, Heinemann AW, Lindner HY, et al. Cross-cultural validity and differential item functioning of the orthotics and prosthetics Users’ survey with Swedish and United States users of lower-limb prosthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1615–26.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jarl GM, Heinemann AW, Hermansson LMN. Validity evidence for a modified version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7:469–78.CrossRef Jarl GM, Heinemann AW, Hermansson LMN. Validity evidence for a modified version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7:469–78.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bakhsh H, Franchignoni F, Bravini E, et al. Validation of the Arabic version of the client satisfaction with device module of the “Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey”. Ann Saudi Med. 2014;34:320–7.CrossRef Bakhsh H, Franchignoni F, Bravini E, et al. Validation of the Arabic version of the client satisfaction with device module of the “Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey”. Ann Saudi Med. 2014;34:320–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bravini E, Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, et al. Validation of the Italian version of the client satisfaction with device module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey. Disabil Health J. 2014;7:442–7.CrossRef Bravini E, Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, et al. Validation of the Italian version of the client satisfaction with device module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey. Disabil Health J. 2014;7:442–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Belvedere SL, de Morton NA. Application of Rasch analysis in health care is increasing and is applied for variable reasons in mobility instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:1287–97.CrossRef Belvedere SL, de Morton NA. Application of Rasch analysis in health care is increasing and is applied for variable reasons in mobility instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:1287–97.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Burger H, Giordano A, Mlakar M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;62:168–73.CrossRef Burger H, Giordano A, Mlakar M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;62:168–73.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Demir Y, Atar NMÖ, Güzelküįük Ü, et al. The use of and satisfaction with prosthesis and quality of life in patients with combat related lower limb amputation, experience of a tertiary referral amputee clinic in Turkey. Gulhane Med J. 2019;61:6–10.CrossRef Demir Y, Atar NMÖ, Güzelküįük Ü, et al. The use of and satisfaction with prosthesis and quality of life in patients with combat related lower limb amputation, experience of a tertiary referral amputee clinic in Turkey. Gulhane Med J. 2019;61:6–10.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Almjewail A, Almjewail A, Alsenaydi S, et al. Analysis of traffic accident in Riyadh using clustering algorithms. In: Alenezi M, Qureshi B, editors., et al., 5th international symposium on data mining applications. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 12–25.CrossRef Almjewail A, Almjewail A, Alsenaydi S, et al. Analysis of traffic accident in Riyadh using clustering algorithms. In: Alenezi M, Qureshi B, editors., et al., 5th international symposium on data mining applications. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 12–25.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mansuri FA, Al-Zalabani AH, Zalat MM, et al. Road safety and road traffic accidents in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review of existing evidence. Saudi Med J. 2015;36:418.CrossRef Mansuri FA, Al-Zalabani AH, Zalat MM, et al. Road safety and road traffic accidents in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review of existing evidence. Saudi Med J. 2015;36:418.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Albabtain I, Alfehaid O, Alghunaim M, et al. Epidemiology of adult trauma at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Health Sci. 2019;8:101–7. Albabtain I, Alfehaid O, Alghunaim M, et al. Epidemiology of adult trauma at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Health Sci. 2019;8:101–7.
16.
go back to reference Alharbi RJ, Lewis V, Mosley I, et al. Current trauma care system in Saudi Arabia: a scoping literature review. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;144:105653.CrossRef Alharbi RJ, Lewis V, Mosley I, et al. Current trauma care system in Saudi Arabia: a scoping literature review. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;144:105653.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Al-Turaiki H, Al-Falahi L. Amputee population in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993;17:147–56.CrossRef Al-Turaiki H, Al-Falahi L. Amputee population in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993;17:147–56.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Leung Y-Y, Png M-E, Conaghan P, et al. A systemic literature review on the application of Rasch analysis in musculoskeletal disease—a special interest group report of OMERACT 11. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:159–64.CrossRef Leung Y-Y, Png M-E, Conaghan P, et al. A systemic literature review on the application of Rasch analysis in musculoskeletal disease—a special interest group report of OMERACT 11. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:159–64.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:85–106.PubMed Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:85–106.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Bond T, Fox C. Applying the Rasch model: fundemental measurment in human sciences. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015.CrossRef Bond T, Fox C. Applying the Rasch model: fundemental measurment in human sciences. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Linacre J. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;7:328. Linacre J. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;7:328.
24.
go back to reference Fisher WP. Reliability statistics. Rasch Meas Trans. 1992;6:238. Fisher WP. Reliability statistics. Rasch Meas Trans. 1992;6:238.
26.
go back to reference Peaco A, Halsne E, Hafner BJ. Assessing satisfaction with orthotic devices and services: a systematic literature review. J Prosthet Orthot. 2011;23:95–105.CrossRef Peaco A, Halsne E, Hafner BJ. Assessing satisfaction with orthotic devices and services: a systematic literature review. J Prosthet Orthot. 2011;23:95–105.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Campbell DJ, Coll N, Thurston WE. Considerations for the provision of prosthetic services in post-disaster contexts: the Haiti Amputee Coalition. Disabil Soc. 2012;27:647–61.CrossRef Campbell DJ, Coll N, Thurston WE. Considerations for the provision of prosthetic services in post-disaster contexts: the Haiti Amputee Coalition. Disabil Soc. 2012;27:647–61.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hadadi M, Ghoseiri K, Fardipour S, et al. The Persian version of satisfaction assessment module of Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey. Disabil Health J. 2016;9:90–9.CrossRef Hadadi M, Ghoseiri K, Fardipour S, et al. The Persian version of satisfaction assessment module of Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey. Disabil Health J. 2016;9:90–9.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Raîche G. Critical eigenvalue sizes (variances) in standardized residual principal components analysis (PCA). Rasch Meas Trans. 2005;19:1012. Raîche G. Critical eigenvalue sizes (variances) in standardized residual principal components analysis (PCA). Rasch Meas Trans. 2005;19:1012.
31.
go back to reference Fisher WP. Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Meas Trans. 2007;21:1095. Fisher WP. Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Meas Trans. 2007;21:1095.
32.
go back to reference Linacre JM. Data variance explained by Rasch measures. Rasch Meas Trans. 2006;20:1045. Linacre JM. Data variance explained by Rasch measures. Rasch Meas Trans. 2006;20:1045.
33.
go back to reference Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, MacKenzie EJ, et al. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:723–9.CrossRef Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, MacKenzie EJ, et al. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:723–9.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ali S, Haider SKF. Psychological adjustment to amputation: variations on the bases of sex, age and cause of limb loss. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017;29:303–7.PubMed Ali S, Haider SKF. Psychological adjustment to amputation: variations on the bases of sex, age and cause of limb loss. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017;29:303–7.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Desteli E, İmren Y, Erdoğan M, et al. Comparison of upper limb amputees and lower limb amputees: a psychosocial perspective. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014;40:735–9.CrossRef Desteli E, İmren Y, Erdoğan M, et al. Comparison of upper limb amputees and lower limb amputees: a psychosocial perspective. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014;40:735–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation
Authors
Hadeel R. Bakhsh
Nilüfer Kablan
Walaa Alammar
Yaşar Tatar
Giorgio Ferriero
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Orthosis
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01773-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2021 Go to the issue