Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports 1/2020

01-03-2020 | Clinical Therapeutics (B McCarthy, R Segraves and R Balon, Section Editors)

Orgasm Equality: Scientific Findings and Societal Implications

Authors: Elizabeth A. Mahar, Laurie B. Mintz, Brianna M. Akers

Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Studies have consistently found that there is a gendered orgasm gap, with men experiencing orgasm more frequently than women in heterosexual sexual encounters. This literature review aims to highlight the current state of research on orgasm equality and to explore the reasons underlying this orgasm gap.

Recent Findings

Our review of recently published studies indicates that the gendered orgasm gap still exists today. Additionally, these studies underscore how sociocultural factors can contribute to the differences in reported orgasm frequency between men and women in heterosexual encounters.

Summary

This review suggests that our cultural prioritization of penile-vaginal intercourse over more clitorally focused sexual activities is linked to the gendered orgasm gap. Additional related contributing sociocultural factors may include women’s lack of entitlement to partnered sexual pleasure, societal scripts about masculinity, and women’s cognitive distractions during partnered sex. Recommendations to increase orgasm equality are discussed.
Footnotes
1
The term cisgender refers to an individual whose gender identity (e.g., woman) matches their sex assigned at birth (e.g., female). To date, all but one study conducted on the orgasm gap has focused on cisgender individuals and/or has not reported individuals’ gender identity. For this reason, we limit our review to heterosexual sex between cisgender women and men.
 
2
A literature search of Google Scholar and University of Florida’s OneSearch was conducted with a particular focus on articles published since January 2015. We searched for peer-reviewed English-language articles with the keywords of “orgasm gap,” “orgasm equality,” “orgasm inequality,” “pleasure gap,” gender “orgasm rate,” or gender “orgasm frequency.” This search yielded 83 articles. After excluding articles on irrelevant topics, we were left with 24 articles. References of these articles were manually searched to identify additional studies.
 
3
Shirazi et al. [26] demonstrated that the way questions are phrased regarding the occurrence of orgasm during intercourse modulates women’s reported frequency of such orgasms, with the highest rate of orgasm reported when the question specifies that intercourse include concurrent clitoral stimulation and the lowest rate of orgasm reported when the question specifies no such concurrent stimulation, with a mid-range rate found when this was left unspecified.
 
4
In this convenience sample, 19% said they rarely if ever orgasmed with a partner.
 
5
Given our cultural usage of the words sex and intercourse as equivalent, research asking about women’s orgasms during “sex” could lead to lower reports of orgasms than actually occur during partnered sexual activity because many heterosexual women exclude activities that are associated with increased likelihood of orgasm (e.g., receiving oral sex) from their personal definitions of sex [9•, 35]. Researchers are thus advised to use precise wording in their studies of orgasm.
 
Literature
8.
go back to reference Andrejek N, Fetner T. The gender gap in orgasms: survey data from a mid-sized Canadian city. Int J Sex Health. 2019;31:26–35.CrossRef Andrejek N, Fetner T. The gender gap in orgasms: survey data from a mid-sized Canadian city. Int J Sex Health. 2019;31:26–35.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference • Frederick DA, St. John HK, Garcia JR, Lloyd EA. Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a U.S. national sample. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47:273–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0939-zExamined orgasm frequency in a large national sample that included non-heterosexual identified people.CrossRefPubMed • Frederick DA, St. John HK, Garcia JR, Lloyd EA. Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a U.S. national sample. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47:273–88. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10508-017-0939-zExamined orgasm frequency in a large national sample that included non-heterosexual identified people.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Armstrong EA, England P, Fogarty ACK. Orgasm in college hookups and relationships. In: Risman BJ, editor. Families as the really are. New York: W.W. Norton; 2009. p. 362–77. Armstrong EA, England P, Fogarty ACK. Orgasm in college hookups and relationships. In: Risman BJ, editor. Families as the really are. New York: W.W. Norton; 2009. p. 362–77.
17.
go back to reference Frith H. Orgasmic bodies: the orgasm in contemporary Western culture. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.CrossRef Frith H. Orgasmic bodies: the orgasm in contemporary Western culture. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mintz LB. Becoming cliterate: why orgasm equality matters - and how to get it. New York: HarperOne; 2017. Mintz LB. Becoming cliterate: why orgasm equality matters - and how to get it. New York: HarperOne; 2017.
20.
go back to reference Wade L. Are women bad at orgasms? Understanding the gender gap. In: Tarrant S, editor. Gender, sex, and politics: in the streets and between the sheets in the 21st century. New York: Routledge; 2015. p. 227–37.CrossRef Wade L. Are women bad at orgasms? Understanding the gender gap. In: Tarrant S, editor. Gender, sex, and politics: in the streets and between the sheets in the 21st century. New York: Routledge; 2015. p. 227–37.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994. Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.
22.
go back to reference Hite S. The Hite report: a nationwide study of female sexuality. New York: Seven Stories Press; 1976. Hite S. The Hite report: a nationwide study of female sexuality. New York: Seven Stories Press; 1976.
32.
go back to reference • Blair KL, Cappell J, Pukall CF. Not all orgasms were created equal: differences in frequency and satisfaction of orgasm experiences by sexual activity in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. J Sex Res. 2017;55:719–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1303437Important study shedding light on how women’s orgasm experiences can differ in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships.CrossRefPubMed • Blair KL, Cappell J, Pukall CF. Not all orgasms were created equal: differences in frequency and satisfaction of orgasm experiences by sexual activity in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. J Sex Res. 2017;55:719–33. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​00224499.​2017.​1303437Important study shedding light on how women’s orgasm experiences can differ in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Mintz L, Guitelman J. Orgasm problems in women. In: Binik Y, Hall K, editors. Principles and practice of sex therapy. 6th ed. New York: Guilford Press. in press. Mintz L, Guitelman J. Orgasm problems in women. In: Binik Y, Hall K, editors. Principles and practice of sex therapy. 6th ed. New York: Guilford Press. in press.
40.
go back to reference McClelland SI. Intimate justice: sexual satisfaction in young adults. PhD [dissertation]. New York: The City University of New York; 2009. McClelland SI. Intimate justice: sexual satisfaction in young adults. PhD [dissertation]. New York: The City University of New York; 2009.
52.
go back to reference Orenstein P. Girls and sex: navigating the complicated new landscape. New York: HarperCollins; 2017. Orenstein P. Girls and sex: navigating the complicated new landscape. New York: HarperCollins; 2017.
63.
go back to reference Warshowsky H. Cliteracy for him: effectiveness of bibliotherapy for heterosexual men’s sexual functioning. PhD [dissertation]. Gainesville: University of Florida; 2019. Warshowsky H. Cliteracy for him: effectiveness of bibliotherapy for heterosexual men’s sexual functioning. PhD [dissertation]. Gainesville: University of Florida; 2019.
64.
go back to reference Dyar C, Newcomb ME, Mustanski B, Whitton SW. A structural equation model of sexual satisfaction and relationship functioning among sexual and gender minority individuals assigned female at birth in diverse relationships. Arch Sex Behav. 2019:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1403-z. Dyar C, Newcomb ME, Mustanski B, Whitton SW. A structural equation model of sexual satisfaction and relationship functioning among sexual and gender minority individuals assigned female at birth in diverse relationships. Arch Sex Behav. 2019:1–18. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10508-019-1403-z.
Metadata
Title
Orgasm Equality: Scientific Findings and Societal Implications
Authors
Elizabeth A. Mahar
Laurie B. Mintz
Brianna M. Akers
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Sexual Health Reports / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1548-3584
Electronic ISSN: 1548-3592
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-020-00237-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Current Sexual Health Reports 1/2020 Go to the issue

Male Sexual Dysfunction and Disorders (N Thirumavalavan, Section Editors)

Fertility Preservation in the Transgender Population

Clinical Therapeutics (B McCarthy, R Segraves and R Balon, Section Editors)

Eating Disorders and Sexual Function Reviewed: A Trans-diagnostic, Dimensional Perspective

Clinical Therapeutics (B McCarthy, R Segraves and R Balon, Section Editors)

Persistent Genitopelvic Pain: Classification, Comorbidities, Chronicity, and Interpersonal Factors

Clinical Therapeutics (B McCarthy, R Segraves and R Balon, Section Editors)

The Pharmacotherapy of Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder