Published in:
01-08-2015
Optimal section thickness for detection of polyps at MR: resolution phantom study
Authors:
Courtney C. Moreno, Pardeep K. Mittal, Nicholas L. Henson, Deborah A. Baumgarten, Lauren F. Alexander, Timothy S. Hanes, William C. Small, Hiroumi D. Kitajima, Jian Kang, John R. Votaw, John N. Oshinski, W. Thomas Dixon
Published in:
Abdominal Radiology
|
Issue 6/2015
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
To determine (1) the sensitivity for detection of small polyps with varying MR slice thicknesses using a resolution phantom; (2) reader confidence in polyp detection; and (3) image acquisition time.
Methods
A resolution phantom was created using a 3D printer. Polyp morphologies were sessile (height = diameter), flat (height = 1/2 diameter of the base), and pedunculated (stalk length = polyp diameter). Polyp diameters were 5, 7, 10, and 12 mm. Images were acquired with section thicknesses of 5, 3, and 1 mm. Images were independently reviewed by 4 board-certified radiologists who were blinded to phantom design and sequences parameters. Readers recorded maximal polyp diameter and confidence level that a polyp was present on a 1–100 point scale. Image acquisition time was also recorded.
Results
All polyps were detected by all 4 readers in the 5-mm-section thickness series. All polyps were detected by 3 readers in the 3- and 1-mm-section thickness series. The fourth reader identified 11/12 polyps in the 3- and 1-mm-section thickness series. Confidence levels were not statistically significantly different for the different section thicknesses (p = 0.28). Increasing the section thickness from 1 to 5 mm decreased image acquisition time from 3 min 54 s to 41 s.
Conclusions
Five-millimeter-section thickness was adequate for identification of 5–12 mm polyps regardless of shape. Pending further reduction in acquisition time, this prototype sequence holds promise for segmental imaging of the colon with MR colonography.