Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgery Today 10/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Article

Optimal Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer as assessed using the newly developed PGSAS-45 scale

Authors: Hiroshi Kawahira, Yasuhiro Kodera, Naoki Hiki, Masazumi Takahashi, Seiji Itoh, Norio Mitsumori, Yoshiyuki Kawashima, Tsutomu Namikawa, Takao Inada, Koji Nakada

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The optimal surgical procedure for distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (DGRY) remains to be determined. Recently, a self-report assessment instrument, the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45), was compiled to evaluate symptoms, the living status and the quality of life of patients who have undergone gastrectomy. We used this scale to evaluate procedures used for DGRY.

Methods

The subjects included 475 patients who underwent DGRY for stage IA/IB gastric cancer. We evaluated whether the size of the remnant stomach, length of the Roux limb, reconstruction route and anastomotic procedure affected the patients’ symptoms, living status and quality of life assessed using the PGSAS-45.

Results

Patients with a residual stomach of more than half had significantly worse esophageal reflux scores than the patients with a smaller residual stomach (P = 0.0462); a residual stomach of one-third or one-fourth was favorable. A shorter length of the Roux limb was shown to be preferable to a longer Roux limb based on the results of the PGSAS-45. In addition, antecolic reconstruction and the anastomotic procedure using a linear stapler were found to be more favorable.

Conclusions

The size of the remnant stomach and the length and route of the Roux limb significantly influence the patient-reported DGRY outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yoshino K. History of gastric cancer surgery. [Article in Japanese] (in jpn). Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi 2000;101:855–60. Yoshino K. History of gastric cancer surgery. [Article in Japanese] (in jpn). Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi 2000;101:855–60.
2.
go back to reference Kelly KA, Becker JM, van Heerden JA. Reconstructive gastric surgery (in eng). Br J Surg. 1981;68:687–91.CrossRefPubMed Kelly KA, Becker JM, van Heerden JA. Reconstructive gastric surgery (in eng). Br J Surg. 1981;68:687–91.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fukuhara K, Osugi H, Takada N, Takemura M, Higashino M, Kinoshita H. Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer that best prevents duodenogastroesophageal reflux (in eng). World J Surg. 2002;26:1452–7.CrossRefPubMed Fukuhara K, Osugi H, Takada N, Takemura M, Higashino M, Kinoshita H. Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer that best prevents duodenogastroesophageal reflux (in eng). World J Surg. 2002;26:1452–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Osugi H, Fukuhara K, Takada N, Takemura M, Kinoshita H. Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy to prevent remnant gastritis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:1215–8.PubMed Osugi H, Fukuhara K, Takada N, Takemura M, Kinoshita H. Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy to prevent remnant gastritis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:1215–8.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Kauer WK, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Feussner H, Ireland AP, Stein HJ, et al. Composition and concentration of bile acid reflux into the esophagus of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgery. 1997;122:874–81.CrossRefPubMed Kauer WK, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Feussner H, Ireland AP, Stein HJ, et al. Composition and concentration of bile acid reflux into the esophagus of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgery. 1997;122:874–81.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Nunobe S, Okaro A, Sasako M, Saka M, Fukagawa T, Katai H, et al. Billroth 1 versus Roux-en-Y reconstructions: a quality-of-life survey at 5 years (in eng). Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:433–9.CrossRefPubMed Nunobe S, Okaro A, Sasako M, Saka M, Fukagawa T, Katai H, et al. Billroth 1 versus Roux-en-Y reconstructions: a quality-of-life survey at 5 years (in eng). Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:433–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mathias JR, Fernandez A, Sninsky CA, Clench MH, Davis RH. Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain after Roux-en-Y anastomosis: motility of the jejunal limb. Gastroenterology. 1985;88:101–7.CrossRefPubMed Mathias JR, Fernandez A, Sninsky CA, Clench MH, Davis RH. Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain after Roux-en-Y anastomosis: motility of the jejunal limb. Gastroenterology. 1985;88:101–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Woodward A, Sillin LF, Wojtowycz AR, Bortoff A. Gastric stasis of solids after Roux gastrectomy: is the jejunal transection important? Journal Surg Res. 1993;55:317–22.CrossRef Woodward A, Sillin LF, Wojtowycz AR, Bortoff A. Gastric stasis of solids after Roux gastrectomy: is the jejunal transection important? Journal Surg Res. 1993;55:317–22.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nakada K, Ikeda M, Takahashi M, Kinami S, Yoshida M, Uenosono Y, et al. Characteristics and clinical relevance of postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS)-45: newly developed integrated questionnaires for assessment of living status and quality of life in postgastrectomy patients (in Eng). Gastric cancer: official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2014. Nakada K, Ikeda M, Takahashi M, Kinami S, Yoshida M, Uenosono Y, et al. Characteristics and clinical relevance of postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS)-45: newly developed integrated questionnaires for assessment of living status and quality of life in postgastrectomy patients (in Eng). Gastric cancer: official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2014.
11.
go back to reference Ware J, Kosinsk M, Dewey J, Gandek B. How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the SF-8 health survey. In: Lincoln RI. Quality Metric Incorporated; (2001). Ware J, Kosinsk M, Dewey J, Gandek B. How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the SF-8 health survey. In: Lincoln RI. Quality Metric Incorporated; (2001).
12.
go back to reference Tokuda Y, Okubo T, Ohde S, Jacobs J, Takahashi O, Omata F, et al. Assessing items on the SF-8 Japanese version for health-related quality of life: a psychometric analysis based on the nominal categories model of item response theory (in eng). Value Health. 2009;12:568–73.CrossRefPubMed Tokuda Y, Okubo T, Ohde S, Jacobs J, Takahashi O, Omata F, et al. Assessing items on the SF-8 Japanese version for health-related quality of life: a psychometric analysis based on the nominal categories model of item response theory (in eng). Value Health. 2009;12:568–73.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Dotevall G. GSRS–a clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease (in eng). Dig Dis Sci. 1988;33:129–34.CrossRefPubMed Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Dotevall G. GSRS–a clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease (in eng). Dig Dis Sci. 1988;33:129–34.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kaizaki S, Nakayama H, Ishigami H, Fujii S, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma (in eng). World J Surg 2005;29:1415–1420. Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kaizaki S, Nakayama H, Ishigami H, Fujii S, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma (in eng). World J Surg 2005;29:1415–1420.
15.
go back to reference Kim BJ, O’Connell T. Gastroduodenostomy after gastric resection for cancer (in eng). Am Surg. 1999;65:905–7.PubMed Kim BJ, O’Connell T. Gastroduodenostomy after gastric resection for cancer (in eng). Am Surg. 1999;65:905–7.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K, Hirao M, Imamura H, Fujita J, Yano M, et al. A comparison of postoperative quality of life and dysfunction after Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction following distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results from a multi-institutional RCT (in eng). Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:198–205.CrossRefPubMed Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K, Hirao M, Imamura H, Fujita J, Yano M, et al. A comparison of postoperative quality of life and dysfunction after Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction following distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results from a multi-institutional RCT (in eng). Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:198–205.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nomura E, Lee SW, Bouras G, Tokuhara T, Hayashi M, Hiramatsu M, et al. Functional outcomes according to the size of the gastric remnant and type of reconstruction following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer (in eng). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:279–84.CrossRefPubMed Nomura E, Lee SW, Bouras G, Tokuhara T, Hayashi M, Hiramatsu M, et al. Functional outcomes according to the size of the gastric remnant and type of reconstruction following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer (in eng). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:279–84.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Karlstrom L, Kelly KA. Ectopic jejunal pacemakers and gastric emptying after Roux gastrectomy: effect of intestinal pacing (in eng). Surgery. 1989;106:867–71.PubMed Karlstrom L, Kelly KA. Ectopic jejunal pacemakers and gastric emptying after Roux gastrectomy: effect of intestinal pacing (in eng). Surgery. 1989;106:867–71.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Li FY, Jiang LS, Cheng JQ, Mao H, Li N, Cheng NS. Clinical application prospects of gastric pacing for treating postoperative gastric motility disorders (in eng). J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:2055–9.CrossRefPubMed Li FY, Jiang LS, Cheng JQ, Mao H, Li N, Cheng NS. Clinical application prospects of gastric pacing for treating postoperative gastric motility disorders (in eng). J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:2055–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Imamura N, Chijiiwa K, Ohuchida J, Hiyoshi M, Nagano M, Otani K, Kondo K, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of a change in gastric emptying and nutritional status after a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison between an antecolic and a vertical retrocolic duodenojejunostomy. LID. doi:10.1111/hpb.12153 (in Eng). Imamura N, Chijiiwa K, Ohuchida J, Hiyoshi M, Nagano M, Otani K, Kondo K, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of a change in gastric emptying and nutritional status after a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison between an antecolic and a vertical retrocolic duodenojejunostomy. LID. doi:10.​1111/​hpb.​12153 (in Eng).
21.
go back to reference Masui T, Kubora T, Nakanishi Y, Aoki K, Sugimoto S, Takamura M, Takeda H, et al. The flow angle beneath the gastrojejunostomy predicts delayed gastric emptying in Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy (in eng). Masui T, Kubora T, Nakanishi Y, Aoki K, Sugimoto S, Takamura M, Takeda H, et al. The flow angle beneath the gastrojejunostomy predicts delayed gastric emptying in Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy (in eng).
22.
go back to reference Leyba JL, Llopis SN, Isaac J, Aulestia SN, Bravo C, Obregon F. Laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity-a randomized controlled trial comparing two gastrojejunal anastomosis techniques (in eng). JSLS. 2008;12:385–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Leyba JL, Llopis SN, Isaac J, Aulestia SN, Bravo C, Obregon F. Laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity-a randomized controlled trial comparing two gastrojejunal anastomosis techniques (in eng). JSLS. 2008;12:385–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Optimal Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer as assessed using the newly developed PGSAS-45 scale
Authors
Hiroshi Kawahira
Yasuhiro Kodera
Naoki Hiki
Masazumi Takahashi
Seiji Itoh
Norio Mitsumori
Yoshiyuki Kawashima
Tsutomu Namikawa
Takao Inada
Koji Nakada
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1111-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

Surgery Today 10/2015 Go to the issue