Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2017

01-10-2017 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Optimal Lymphadenectomy for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: Does the Number Alone Matter?

Authors: Taro Sakamoto, MD, Akio Saiura, MD, PhD, Yoshihiro Ono, MD, PhD, Yoshihiro Mise, MD, PhD, Yosuke Inoue, MD, PhD, Takeaki Ishizawa, MD, PhD, Yu Takahashi, MD, PhD, Hiromichi Ito, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) is a rare disease, and the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy and the role of limited resection remain controversial.

Objective

The aim of our study was to assess the pattern of regional lymph node spread of DA and to determine the optimal extent of resection.

Methods

A total of 65 patients who underwent curative resection for DA at our institution from 1989 through 2015 were included in this study. Clinicopathologic factors associated with long-term outcomes and the patterns of regional node spread per primary tumor location were evaluated.

Results

Fifty-one patients (78%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), with the remainder undergoing limited resection. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 24 (range 1–63) and 48% of patients had regional node metastasis. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 67%. In the multivariate analysis, regional node and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were risk factors associated with poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR] 12.1 [p = 0.025], and HR 3.2 [p = 0.045], respectively). While pancreaticoduodenal (#13) and superior mesenteric (#14) lymph node stations were commonly involved by both distal and proximal DA (33 vs. 39% for #13, p = 0.39; and 33 vs. 22% for #14, p = 0.27), the pyloric lymph node station was much less involved by distal DA than proximal DA (0 vs. 37%, p = 0.036).

Conclusion

The pancreaticoduodenal lymph node station was the most commonly involved lymph node in DA, and PD should be the standard operation for DA. Segmental resection should only be reserved for patients with distal DA who are physically unfit for PD.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Kaklamanos IG, Bathe OF, Franceschi D, Camarda C, Levi J, Livingstone AS. Extent of resection in the management of duodenal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2000;179(1):37–41.CrossRefPubMed Kaklamanos IG, Bathe OF, Franceschi D, Camarda C, Levi J, Livingstone AS. Extent of resection in the management of duodenal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2000;179(1):37–41.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Puma F, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum: results of surgical treatment. Arch. Surg. 2003;138(1):80–85.CrossRefPubMed Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Puma F, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum: results of surgical treatment. Arch. Surg. 2003;138(1):80–85.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sarela AI, Brennan MF, Karpeh MS, Klimstra D, Conlon KC. Adenocarcinoma of the duodenum: importance of accurate lymph node staging and similarity in outcome to gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(4):380–86.CrossRefPubMed Sarela AI, Brennan MF, Karpeh MS, Klimstra D, Conlon KC. Adenocarcinoma of the duodenum: importance of accurate lymph node staging and similarity in outcome to gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(4):380–86.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lee HG, You DD, Paik KY, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW. Prognostic factors for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2008;32(10):2246–52.CrossRefPubMed Lee HG, You DD, Paik KY, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW. Prognostic factors for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2008;32(10):2246–52.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Zhang S, Cui Y, Zhong B, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival analysis of primary duodenal cancers: a 14-year experience in a tertiary centre in South China. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(2):219–26.CrossRefPubMed Zhang S, Cui Y, Zhong B, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival analysis of primary duodenal cancers: a 14-year experience in a tertiary centre in South China. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(2):219–26.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Poultsides GA, Huang LC, Cameron JL, et al. Duodenal adenocarcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis and implications for treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(6):1928–35.CrossRefPubMed Poultsides GA, Huang LC, Cameron JL, et al. Duodenal adenocarcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis and implications for treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(6):1928–35.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lee SY, Lee JH, Hwang DW, Kim SC, Park KM, Lee YJ. Long-term outcomes in patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma. ANZ J Surg. May 8 2014;84(12):970–75.CrossRefPubMed Lee SY, Lee JH, Hwang DW, Kim SC, Park KM, Lee YJ. Long-term outcomes in patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma. ANZ J Surg. May 8 2014;84(12):970–75.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Solaini L, Jamieson NB, Metcalfe M, et al. Outcome after surgical resection for duodenal adenocarcinoma in the UK. Br J Surg. 2015;102(6):676–81.CrossRefPubMed Solaini L, Jamieson NB, Metcalfe M, et al. Outcome after surgical resection for duodenal adenocarcinoma in the UK. Br J Surg. 2015;102(6):676–81.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Compton CC, Byrd DR, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kurtzman SH, Olawaiye A, Washington MK. Small Intestine. In: Compton CC, Byrd RD, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kurtzman HS, Olawaiye A, Washington KM (eds) AJCC cancer staging atlas: a companion to the seventh editions of the AJCC cancer staging manual and handbook. Springer, New York; 2012. pp. 155–67CrossRef Compton CC, Byrd DR, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kurtzman SH, Olawaiye A, Washington MK. Small Intestine. In: Compton CC, Byrd RD, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kurtzman HS, Olawaiye A, Washington KM (eds) AJCC cancer staging atlas: a companion to the seventh editions of the AJCC cancer staging manual and handbook. Springer, New York; 2012. pp. 155–67CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Skandalakis JE, Skandalakis LJ, Colborn GL, Pemberton LB, Gray SW. The duodenum. Surgical anatomy. Am Surg. 1989;55(5):291–98.PubMed Skandalakis JE, Skandalakis LJ, Colborn GL, Pemberton LB, Gray SW. The duodenum. Surgical anatomy. Am Surg. 1989;55(5):291–98.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Cox D. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc. 1972;34:197–219. Cox D. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc. 1972;34:197–219.
13.
go back to reference Cecchini S, Correa-Gallego C, Desphande V, et al. Superior prognostic importance of perineural invasion vs. lymph node involvement after curative resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(1):113–20. discussion 120 CrossRefPubMed Cecchini S, Correa-Gallego C, Desphande V, et al. Superior prognostic importance of perineural invasion vs. lymph node involvement after curative resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(1):113–20. discussion 120 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Onkendi EO, Boostrom SY, Sarr MG, et al. 15-year experience with surgical treatment of duodenal carcinoma: a comparison of periampullary and extra-ampullary duodenal carcinomas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(4):682–91.CrossRefPubMed Onkendi EO, Boostrom SY, Sarr MG, et al. 15-year experience with surgical treatment of duodenal carcinoma: a comparison of periampullary and extra-ampullary duodenal carcinomas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(4):682–91.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cloyd JM, Norton JA, Visser BC, Poultsides GA. Does the extent of resection impact survival for duodenal adenocarcinoma? Analysis of 1,611 cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(2):573–80.CrossRefPubMed Cloyd JM, Norton JA, Visser BC, Poultsides GA. Does the extent of resection impact survival for duodenal adenocarcinoma? Analysis of 1,611 cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(2):573–80.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Solaini L, Jamieson NB, Metcalfe M, et al. Outcome after surgical resection for duodenal adenocarcinoma in the UK. Br J Surg. 2015;102(6):676–81.CrossRefPubMed Solaini L, Jamieson NB, Metcalfe M, et al. Outcome after surgical resection for duodenal adenocarcinoma in the UK. Br J Surg. 2015;102(6):676–81.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Leung WK, Wu MS, Kakugawa Y, et al. Screening for gastric cancer in Asia: current evidence and practice. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(3):279–87.CrossRefPubMed Leung WK, Wu MS, Kakugawa Y, et al. Screening for gastric cancer in Asia: current evidence and practice. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(3):279–87.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gibbs JF. Duodenal adenocarcinoma: is total lymph node sampling predictive of outcome? Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(4):354–55.CrossRefPubMed Gibbs JF. Duodenal adenocarcinoma: is total lymph node sampling predictive of outcome? Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(4):354–55.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kaklamanos IG, Bathe OF, Franceschi D, Camarda C, Levi J, Livingstone AS. Extent of resection in the management of duodenal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2000;179(1):37–41.CrossRefPubMed Kaklamanos IG, Bathe OF, Franceschi D, Camarda C, Levi J, Livingstone AS. Extent of resection in the management of duodenal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2000;179(1):37–41.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Puma F, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum: results of surgical treatment. Arch Surg. 2003;138(1):80–85.CrossRefPubMed Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Puma F, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum: results of surgical treatment. Arch Surg. 2003;138(1):80–85.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Optimal Lymphadenectomy for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: Does the Number Alone Matter?
Authors
Taro Sakamoto, MD
Akio Saiura, MD, PhD
Yoshihiro Ono, MD, PhD
Yoshihiro Mise, MD, PhD
Yosuke Inoue, MD, PhD
Takeaki Ishizawa, MD, PhD
Yu Takahashi, MD, PhD
Hiromichi Ito, MD
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6044-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2017 Go to the issue