Top

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Published in:

01-05-2013 | Refractive Surgery

Optical quality of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens for different refractive powers

Authors: Cari Pérez-Vives, Alberto Domínguez-Vicent, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Álvaro M. Pons, Robert Montés-Micó

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 5/2013

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the optical quality of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for different powers and pupil diameters.

Methods

Wavefront aberrations of the −3, −6, −9, −12 and −15 diopters (D) V4b ICLs were measured at 3- and 4.5-mm pupils. The root mean square (RMS) of total higher order aberrations (HOAs), trefoil, coma, tetrafoil, secondary astigmatism, and spherical aberration were evaluated. In addition, modulation transfer function (MTF) of the five ICL powers was measured for a 3-mm pupil. The point spread functions (PSFs) of each ICL evaluated was calculated from the wavefront aberrations at 4.5-mm pupil.

Results

The ICLs evaluated had negative spherical aberration and negligible amounts of other aberrations. The negative spherical aberration increases when the ICL power increases being related with its innate optical properties. At 3-mm pupil, no statistically significant differences between ICLs were found for all the Zernike coefficient RMS values analyzed (p > 0.05). At 4.5-mm pupil, significant RMS values for the spherical aberration and total HOAs were found between medium-low and high powers (p < 0.05). Similar MTFs were obtained for all ICLs, although they slightly worsened when increased the ICL power.

Conclusions

ICLs evaluated provide good optical quality in terms of wavefront aberrations, MTF, and PSF. Although spherical aberration increases with ICL power, these values are clinically negligible to affect the visual quality after its implantation.

The Implantable Contact Lens in Treatment of Myopia (ITM) Study Group (2003) . U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia. Ophthalmology 110:255–266CrossRef

ICL in Treatment of Myopia (ITM) Study Group (2004) United States Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for moderate to high myopia; three-year follow up. Ophthalmology 111:1683–1692CrossRef

Gonvers M, Othenin-Girard P, Bornet C, Sickenberg M (2001) Implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia: short-term follow-up of 2 models. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:380–388PubMedCrossRef

Uusitalo RJ, Aine E, Sen NH, Laatikainen L (2002) Implantable contact lens for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:29–36PubMedCrossRef

Pineda-Fernández A, Jaramillo J, Vargas J, Jaramillo M, Jaramillo J, Galíndez A (2004) Phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:2277–2283PubMedCrossRef

Ieong A, Rubin GS, Allan BDS (2009) Quality of life in high myopia. Implantable collamer lens implantation versus contact lens wear. Ophthalmology 116:275–280PubMedCrossRef

Ieong A, Hau SCH, Rubin GS, Allan BDS (2010) Quality of life in high myopia before and after implantable collamer lens implantation. Ophthalmology 117:2295–2300PubMedCrossRef

Lackner B, Pieh S, Schmidinger G, Simader C, Franz C, Dejaco-Ruhswurm I, Skorpik C (2004) Long-term results of implantation of phakic posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:2269–2276PubMedCrossRef

Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Hikita F, Komatsu M (2009) Four-year follow-up of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for moderate to high myopia. Arch Ophthalmol 127:845–850PubMedCrossRef

10.

Alfonso JF, Baamonde B, Fernández-Vega L, Fernandes P, González-Méijome JM, Montés-Micó R (2011) Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lenses to correct myopia: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:873–880PubMedCrossRef

11.

Davidorf JM, Zaldivar R, Oscherow S (1998) Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens for hyperopia of +4 to +11 diopters. J Refract Surg 14:306–311PubMed

12.

Pesando PM, Ghiringhello MP, Di Meglio G, Fanton G (2007) Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (ICL) for hyperopia: ten-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1579–1584PubMedCrossRef

13.

Alfonso JF, Fernández-vega L, Fernandes P, González-Méijome JM, Montés-Micó R (2010) Collagen copolymer toric posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens for myopic astigmatism: one-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:568–576PubMedCrossRef

14.

Alfonso JF, Baamonde B, Madrid-Costa D, Fernandes P, Jorge J, Montés-Micó R (2010) Collagen copolymer toric posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses to correct high myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1349–1357PubMedCrossRef

15.

Sanders DR, Vukich JA (2003) Comparison of implantable contact lens and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. Cornea 22:324–331PubMedCrossRef

16.

Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Komatsu M (2008) Comparison of collamer toric contact lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:1687–1693PubMedCrossRef

17.

Igarashi A, Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Komatsu M (2009) Visual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 148:164–170PubMedCrossRef

18.

Shin JY, Ahn H, Seo KY, Kim EK, Kim (2012) Comparison of higher-order aberrations after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided LASEK in high myopia. J Refract Surg 28:106–111PubMedCrossRef

19.

Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shimizu K, Matsumura K, Komatsu M (2012) Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 153:1178–1186PubMedCrossRef

20.

Sanders D, Vukich JA (2006) Comparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopia. Cornea 25:1139–1146PubMedCrossRef

21.

Sanders DR (2007) Matched population comparison of the Visian implantable collamer lens and standard LASIK for myopia of −3.00 to −7.88 diopters. J Refract Surg 23:537–553PubMed

22.

Gatinel D, Adam PA, Chaabouni S, Munck J, Thevenot M, Hoang-Xuan T, Pieger S, Fujieda M, Bains HS (2010) Comparison of corneal and total ocular aberrations before and after myopic LASIK. J Refract Surg 26:333–340PubMedCrossRef

23.

Sarver EJ, Sanders DR, Vukich JA (2003) Image quality in myopic eyes corrected with laser in situ keratomileusis and phakic intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 19:397–404PubMed

24.

Kim SW, Yang H, Yoon G, Lee YJ, Kweon MN, Kim JK, Seo KY (2011) Higher-order aberration changes after implantable collamer lens implantation for myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 151:653–662PubMedCrossRef

25.

Joannes L, Hough T, Hutsebaut X, Dubois X, Ligot R, Saoul B, Donink PV, De Coninck K (2010) The reproducibility of a new power mapping instrument based on the phase shifting schlieren method for the measurement of spherical and toric contact lenses. CLAE 33:3–8

26.

Joannes L, Dubois F, Legros JC (2003) Phase-shifting schlieren: high-resolution quantitative schlieren that uses the phase-shifting technique principle. Appl Opt 42:5046–5053PubMedCrossRef

27.

Gatinel D, Pagnoulle C, Houbrechts Y, Gobin L (2011) Design and qualification of a diffractive trifocal optical profile for intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:2060–2067PubMedCrossRef

28.

International Organization for Standardization (1999) Ophthalmic implants — intraocular lenses - part 2: optical properties and test methods. ISO, Geneva (ISO 11979–2)

29.

International Organization for Standardization (2006) Ophthalmic implants — intraocular lenses - part 9: multifocal intraocular lenses. ISO, Geneva (ISO 11979–9)

30.

Sekiguchi N, Williams DR, Brainard DH (1993) Efficiency in detection of isoluminant and isochromatic interference fringes. J Opt Soc Am A 10:2118–2133CrossRef

31.

Rocha KM, Vabre L, Harms F, Chateau N, Krueger RR (2007) Effects of Zernike wavefront aberrations on visual acuity measured using electromagnetic adaptive optics technology. J Refract Surg 23:953–959PubMed

32.

Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Cerviño A (2009) Analysis of the possible benefits of aspheric intraocular lenses: review of the literature. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:172–181PubMedCrossRef

33.

Fernandes P, González-Méijome JM, Madrid-Costa D, Ferrer-Blasco T, Jorge J, Montés-Micó R (2011) Implantable collamer posterior chamber intraocular lenses: a review of potential complications. J Refract Surg 27:765–776PubMedCrossRef

34.

Uozato H, Shimizu K, Kawamorita T, Ohmoto F (2011) Modulation transfer function of intraocular collamer lens with a central artificial hole. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1081–1085PubMedCrossRef

35.

Ohmoto F, Shimizu K, Uozato H, Kawamorita T, Uga S (2010) Optical performance of implantable collamer lenses with and without a central perforation. Kitasato Med J 40:150–153

36.

Shiratani T, Shimizu K, Fujisawa K, Uga S, Nagano K, Murakami Y (2008) Crystalline lens changes in porcine eyes with implanted phakic IOL (ICL) with a central hole. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:719–728PubMedCrossRef

37.

Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kobashi H, Ishii R, Sato N (2012) Clinical evaluation of optical quality and intraocular scattering after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:3161–3166PubMedCrossRef

38.

Applegate RA, Howland HC (1993) Magnification and visual acuity in refractive surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 111:1335–1342PubMedCrossRef

Title: Optical quality of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens for different refractive powers
Authors: Cari Pérez-Vives
Alberto Domínguez-Vicent
Teresa Ferrer-Blasco
Álvaro M. Pons
Robert Montés-Micó
Publication date: 01-05-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2200-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Optical quality of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens for different refractive powers

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Graft versus host disease: clinical evaluation, diagnosis and management

Influence of sutureless 23-gauge sclerotomy architecture on postoperative intraocular pressure decrease: results of a multivariate analysis

Refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) and wavefront-optimized Femto-LASIK: comparison of contrast sensitivity and high-order aberrations at 1 year

In-vivo investigation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization in rat using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)

Pars plana vitrectomy for disturbing primary vitreous floaters: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction

Intraocular collision tumour: case report and literature review