Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Operational strategies for achieving comprehensive cancer center community outreach and engagement objectives: impact and logic models

Authors: Folakemi T. Odedina, Manisha Salinas, Monica Albertie, Doug Murrell, Kristin Munoz

Published in: Archives of Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Cancer Center Support Grants (CCSGs) encourages Cancer Centers to address health disparities and reduce the cancer burden in their Catchment Area (CA) through an organized Community Outreach and Engagement (COE) structure. This paper shares the development of two guide models that fosters the operations of the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center (MCCCC) COE Office and programs, the MCCCC COE Impact Model and the MCCCC COE Logic Model.

Methods

Following a less than stellar CCSG rating for COE in 2018, the MCCCC developed a transition team to specifically address the critique and create a transformative plan for engaging communities to address cancer burden in the CA. A qualitative research approach was employed, focusing on organizing and displaying the relationship between MCCCC COE processes and outcomes through impact and logic models. An impact model was developed to illustrate the components of the CCSG and connect those components to short- and long-term COE outcomes. A logic model was developed to track and monitor activities for continuous process improvement for all COE activities.

Results

The impact and logic model serve as a roadmap to monitor progress towards short- and long-term COE goals of the MCCCC. The COE operational strategies draw upon bidirectional partnership, evidence-based practices, and research facilitation to respond to the CCSG critique.

Conclusion

These strategies demonstrate successful practices in addressing cancer burden, promoting health equity and eliminating cancer disparities in the MCCCC CA.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Knowlton LW, Phillips CC. The logic model guidebook: better strategies for great results. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2012. p. 4. Knowlton LW, Phillips CC. The logic model guidebook: better strategies for great results. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2012. p. 4.
3.
go back to reference W.W Kellogg Foundation. Logic model development guide-using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation and action. Michigan: W.W Kellogg Foundation; 2004. p. 2. W.W Kellogg Foundation. Logic model development guide-using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation and action. Michigan: W.W Kellogg Foundation; 2004. p. 2.
4.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Utilization-focused evaluation. St. Paul: Sage; 2008. Patton MQ. Utilization-focused evaluation. St. Paul: Sage; 2008.
5.
go back to reference Elwy AR, Wasan AD, Gillman AG, Johnston KL, Dodds N, McFarland C, Greco CM. Using formative evaluation methods to improve clinical implementation efforts: description and an example. Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112532.CrossRefPubMed Elwy AR, Wasan AD, Gillman AG, Johnston KL, Dodds N, McFarland C, Greco CM. Using formative evaluation methods to improve clinical implementation efforts: description and an example. Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112532.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Perrin KKM. Essentials of planning and evaluation for public health. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett; 2014. Perrin KKM. Essentials of planning and evaluation for public health. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett; 2014.
7.
go back to reference Frechtling JA. Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. Frechtling JA. Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
8.
go back to reference McLaughlin JA, Jordan GB. Logic models: a tool for telling your programs performance story. Eval Program Plann. 1999;22(1):65.CrossRef McLaughlin JA, Jordan GB. Logic models: a tool for telling your programs performance story. Eval Program Plann. 1999;22(1):65.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 1996. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 1996.
10.
go back to reference Hiatt RA, Kobetz EN, Paskett ED. Catchment areas, community outreach and engagement revisited: the 2021 guidelines for Cancer Center Support Grants from the National Cancer Institute. Cancer Prev Res. 2022;15(6):349.CrossRef Hiatt RA, Kobetz EN, Paskett ED. Catchment areas, community outreach and engagement revisited: the 2021 guidelines for Cancer Center Support Grants from the National Cancer Institute. Cancer Prev Res. 2022;15(6):349.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Joosten YA, Israel TL, Williams NA, Boone LR, Schlundt DG, Mouton CP, Dittus RS, Bernad GR, Wilkins CH. Community engagement studios: a structured approach to obtaining meaningful input from stakeholders to inform research. Acad Med. 2015;90(12):1646.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Joosten YA, Israel TL, Williams NA, Boone LR, Schlundt DG, Mouton CP, Dittus RS, Bernad GR, Wilkins CH. Community engagement studios: a structured approach to obtaining meaningful input from stakeholders to inform research. Acad Med. 2015;90(12):1646.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Alaniz M, Rebbeck TR. The role of community outreach and engagement in evaluation of NCI Cancer Center Support Grants. Cancer Causes Control. 2023. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37563423. Alaniz M, Rebbeck TR. The role of community outreach and engagement in evaluation of NCI Cancer Center Support Grants. Cancer Causes Control. 2023. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37563423.
Metadata
Title
Operational strategies for achieving comprehensive cancer center community outreach and engagement objectives: impact and logic models
Authors
Folakemi T. Odedina
Manisha Salinas
Monica Albertie
Doug Murrell
Kristin Munoz
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Archives of Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 2049-3258
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01252-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Archives of Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue