Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Commentary

OpenTrials: towards a collaborative open database of all available information on all clinical trials

Authors: Ben Goldacre, Jonathan Gray

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

OpenTrials is a collaborative and open database for all available structured data and documents on all clinical trials, threaded together by individual trial. With a versatile and expandable data schema, it is initially designed to host and match the following documents and data for each trial: registry entries; links, abstracts, or texts of academic journal papers; portions of regulatory documents describing individual trials; structured data on methods and results extracted by systematic reviewers or other researchers; clinical study reports; and additional documents such as blank consent forms, blank case report forms, and protocols. The intention is to create an open, freely re-usable index of all such information and to increase discoverability, facilitate research, identify inconsistent data, enable audits on the availability and completeness of this information, support advocacy for better data and drive up standards around open data in evidence-based medicine. The project has phase I funding. This will allow us to create a practical data schema and populate the database initially through web-scraping, basic record linkage techniques, crowd-sourced curation around selected drug areas, and import of existing sources of structured and documents. It will also allow us to create user-friendly web interfaces onto the data and conduct user engagement workshops to optimise the database and interface designs. Where other projects have set out to manually and perfectly curate a narrow range of information on a smaller number of trials, we aim to use a broader range of techniques and attempt to match a very large quantity of information on all trials. We are currently seeking feedback and additional sources of structured data.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schmucker C et al. Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schmucker C et al. Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Song F. et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(8). Song F. et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(8).
5.
go back to reference Chan AW. Out of sight but not out of mind: how to search for unpublished clinical trial evidence. BMJ. 2012;344:d8013.CrossRefPubMed Chan AW. Out of sight but not out of mind: how to search for unpublished clinical trial evidence. BMJ. 2012;344:d8013.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2009;302:977–84.CrossRefPubMed Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2009;302:977–84.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chalmers I, Altman DG. How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing. Lancet. 1999;353:490–3.CrossRefPubMed Chalmers I, Altman DG. How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing. Lancet. 1999;353:490–3.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pfiffner PB, Oh J, Miller TA, Mandl KD. ClinicalTrials.gov as a data source for semi-automated point-of-care trial eligibility screening. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111055.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pfiffner PB, Oh J, Miller TA, Mandl KD. ClinicalTrials.gov as a data source for semi-automated point-of-care trial eligibility screening. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111055.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Wieseler B et al. Completeness of reporting of patient-relevant clinical trial outcomes: comparison of unpublished clinical study reports with publicly available data. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wieseler B et al. Completeness of reporting of patient-relevant clinical trial outcomes: comparison of unpublished clinical study reports with publicly available data. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Hartung DM et al. Reporting discrepancies between the ClinicalTrials.gov results database and peer-reviewed publications. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:477–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hartung DM et al. Reporting discrepancies between the ClinicalTrials.gov results database and peer-reviewed publications. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:477–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA. 2010;303:2058–64.CrossRefPubMed Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA. 2010;303:2058–64.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Doshi P, Jefferson T, Del Mar C. The imperative to share clinical study reports: recommendations from the Tamiflu experience. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Doshi P, Jefferson T, Del Mar C. The imperative to share clinical study reports: recommendations from the Tamiflu experience. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Jefferson T et al. Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory comments. BMJ. 2014;348:g2545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jefferson T et al. Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory comments. BMJ. 2014;348:g2545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
23.
28.
go back to reference Gray J, Davies TG. Fighting phantom firms in the UK: from opening up datasets to reshaping data infrastructures? Working paper presented at the Open Data Research Symposium at the 3rd International Open Government Data Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 27. 2015. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2610937. Accessed 19 March 2016. Gray J, Davies TG. Fighting phantom firms in the UK: from opening up datasets to reshaping data infrastructures? Working paper presented at the Open Data Research Symposium at the 3rd International Open Government Data Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 27. 2015. http://​papers.​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​2610937. Accessed 19 March 2016.
Metadata
Title
OpenTrials: towards a collaborative open database of all available information on all clinical trials
Authors
Ben Goldacre
Jonathan Gray
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1290-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Trials 1/2016 Go to the issue