Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Openness in the NHS: a secondary longitudinal analysis of national staff and patient surveys

Authors: Imelda McCarthy, Jeremy Dawson, Graham Martin

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Improving openness—including candour when things go wrong, and willingness to learn from mistakes—is increasingly seen as a priority in many healthcare systems. This study explores perceptions of openness in England before and after the publication of the Francis report (2013), which examined failings of openness at one English hospital. We examine whether staff and patients’ views on openness, and experiences of giving voice to concerns, have changed since the report’s publication for better or worse.

Methods

Organisational-level data was collated for all trusts from the NHS National Staff Survey (2007–2017), NHS Acute Inpatient Survey (2004–2016) and NHS Community Mental Health Service User Survey (2007–2017). Survey items related to openness were identified and longitudinal statistical analysis conducted (piecewise growth curve and interrupted latent growth curve analysis) to determine whether there was evidence of a shift in the rate or direction of change following publication of the Francis report.

Results

For some variables there was a discernible change in trajectory after the publication of the Francis report. Staff survey variables continued to rise after 2013, with a statistically significant increase in rate for “fairness and effectiveness of incident reporting procedures” (from + 0.02 to + 0.06 per year; p < .001). For the patient surveys, the picture was more mixed: patient views about information provided by accident and emergency staff rose from a 0.3% increase per year before 2013 to 0.8% per year afterwards (p < .01), and inpatients being involved in decision making increased from a 0.4% rise per year before 2013 to 0.8% per year afterwards (p < .01); however, there were not rises in the other questions. Mental health patients reported a decrease after 2013 in being listened to (decreasing at a rate of 1.9% per year, p < .001).

Conclusions

Data suggest that the Francis inquiry may have had a positive impact on staff and acute inpatients’ perceptions and experiences of openness in the NHS. However such improvements have not transpired in mental health. How best to create an environment in which patients can discuss their care and raise concerns openly in mental health settings may require further consideration.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Department of Health: Culture Change in the NHS: Applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries. 2015. Department of Health: Culture Change in the NHS: Applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries. 2015.
2.
go back to reference Francis R. Report of the mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation trust public inquiry: executive summary, vol. 947: the stationery Office; 2013. Francis R. Report of the mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation trust public inquiry: executive summary, vol. 947: the stationery Office; 2013.
3.
go back to reference Kirkup B. Reflections on the Morcambe Bay investigation. Midwives. 2015;18:47–8.PubMed Kirkup B. Reflections on the Morcambe Bay investigation. Midwives. 2015;18:47–8.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Pham JC, Gianci S, Battles J, Beard P, Clarke JR, Coates H, Donaldson L, Eldridge N, Fletcher M, Goeschel CA, et al. Establishing a global learning community for incident-reporting systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):446–51.PubMed Pham JC, Gianci S, Battles J, Beard P, Clarke JR, Coates H, Donaldson L, Eldridge N, Fletcher M, Goeschel CA, et al. Establishing a global learning community for incident-reporting systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):446–51.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Casali GL, Day GE. Treating an unhealthy organisational culture: the implications of the Bundaberg hospital inquiry for managerial ethical decision making. Aust Health Rev. 2010;34(1):73–9.CrossRefPubMed Casali GL, Day GE. Treating an unhealthy organisational culture: the implications of the Bundaberg hospital inquiry for managerial ethical decision making. Aust Health Rev. 2010;34(1):73–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lucian Leape Institute. Shining a light: safer health care through transparency. Boston, MA: National Patient Safety Foundation; 2015. Lucian Leape Institute. Shining a light: safer health care through transparency. Boston, MA: National Patient Safety Foundation; 2015.
7.
go back to reference Francis R. Independent inquiry into care provided by mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust January 2005–March 2009, vol. 375: The Stationery Office; 2010. Francis R. Independent inquiry into care provided by mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust January 2005–March 2009, vol. 375: The Stationery Office; 2010.
8.
go back to reference Newdick C, Danbury C. Culture, compassion and clinical neglect: probity in the NHS after mid Staffordshire. J Med Ethics. 2015;41(12):956–62.CrossRefPubMed Newdick C, Danbury C. Culture, compassion and clinical neglect: probity in the NHS after mid Staffordshire. J Med Ethics. 2015;41(12):956–62.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jones A, Kelly D. Deafening silence? Time to reconsider whether organisations are silent or deaf when things go wrong. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(9):709–13.CrossRefPubMed Jones A, Kelly D. Deafening silence? Time to reconsider whether organisations are silent or deaf when things go wrong. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(9):709–13.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Department of Health. Hard Truths, The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume One of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office; 2013. Department of Health. Hard Truths, The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume One of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office; 2013.
11.
go back to reference England NHS. Serious incident framework. In: Supporting learning to prevent recurrence; 2015. England NHS. Serious incident framework. In: Supporting learning to prevent recurrence; 2015.
12.
go back to reference Department of Health. Learning not blaming. The government response to the Freedom to Speak Up consultation, the Public Administration Select Committee report ‘Investigating Clinical Incidents in the NHS’, and the Morecambe Bay Investigation. London: The Stationery Office; 2015. Department of Health. Learning not blaming. The government response to the Freedom to Speak Up consultation, the Public Administration Select Committee report ‘Investigating Clinical Incidents in the NHS’, and the Morecambe Bay Investigation. London: The Stationery Office; 2015.
13.
go back to reference Mishra AK. Organizational responses to crisis. Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. 1996;261:1996. Mishra AK. Organizational responses to crisis. Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. 1996;261:1996.
14.
go back to reference Firth-Cozens J. Organisational trust: the keystone to patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(1):56–61.CrossRefPubMed Firth-Cozens J. Organisational trust: the keystone to patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(1):56–61.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Care Quality Commission. National NHS Staff Survey Guidance Notes. London: Care Quality Commission; 2017. Care Quality Commission. National NHS Staff Survey Guidance Notes. London: Care Quality Commission; 2017.
16.
go back to reference Care Quality Commission. Sampling handbook for the NHS adult Inpatient Survey. London: Care Quality Commission; 2016. Care Quality Commission. Sampling handbook for the NHS adult Inpatient Survey. London: Care Quality Commission; 2016.
17.
go back to reference Care Quality Commission. Community Mental Health Survey. London: Care Quality Commission; 2017. Care Quality Commission. Community Mental Health Survey. London: Care Quality Commission; 2017.
18.
go back to reference Chou C-P, Yang D, Pentz MA, Hser Y-IJCS, Analysis D: Piecewise growth curve modeling approach for longitudinal prevention study 2004, 46(2):213–225. Chou C-P, Yang D, Pentz MA, Hser Y-IJCS, Analysis D: Piecewise growth curve modeling approach for longitudinal prevention study 2004, 46(2):213–225.
19.
go back to reference Duncan TE, Duncan SC. A latent growth curve modeling approach to pooled interrupted time series analyses. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(4):271–8.CrossRef Duncan TE, Duncan SC. A latent growth curve modeling approach to pooled interrupted time series analyses. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(4):271–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gilburt H. Mental health under pressure; 2015. Gilburt H. Mental health under pressure; 2015.
21.
go back to reference Martin GP, Chew S, Dixon-Woods M. Senior stakeholder views on policies to foster a culture of openness in the English National Health Service: a qualitative interview study. J R Soc Med. 2019;112(4):153–9.CrossRefPubMed Martin GP, Chew S, Dixon-Woods M. Senior stakeholder views on policies to foster a culture of openness in the English National Health Service: a qualitative interview study. J R Soc Med. 2019;112(4):153–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kendall-Raynor P. MPs say improvement plan for mental health may not be achievable. Ment Health Pract. 2016;20(2):10.CrossRef Kendall-Raynor P. MPs say improvement plan for mental health may not be achievable. Ment Health Pract. 2016;20(2):10.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bailey S. Parity of Esteem for Mental Health. In: Williams R, Kemp V, Williams R, Haslam A, Haslam C, Bhui K, Bailey S, editors. Social Scaffolding: Applying the Lessons of Contemporary Social Science to Health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. p. 66–71.CrossRef Bailey S. Parity of Esteem for Mental Health. In: Williams R, Kemp V, Williams R, Haslam A, Haslam C, Bhui K, Bailey S, editors. Social Scaffolding: Applying the Lessons of Contemporary Social Science to Health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. p. 66–71.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Araya R, Alvarado R, Minoletti A. Chile: an ongoing mental health revolution. Lancet. 2009;374(9690):597–8.CrossRefPubMed Araya R, Alvarado R, Minoletti A. Chile: an ongoing mental health revolution. Lancet. 2009;374(9690):597–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Department of Health. Health and social care act 2012. London: The Stationery Office; 2012. Department of Health. Health and social care act 2012. London: The Stationery Office; 2012.
27.
go back to reference Moore J, Mello MM. Improving reconciliation following medical injury: a qualitative study of responses to patient safety incidents in New Zealand. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(10):788–98.CrossRefPubMed Moore J, Mello MM. Improving reconciliation following medical injury: a qualitative study of responses to patient safety incidents in New Zealand. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(10):788–98.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Moore J, Bismark M, Mello MM. Patients’ experiences with communication-and-resolution programs after medical injury. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(11):1595–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moore J, Bismark M, Mello MM. Patients’ experiences with communication-and-resolution programs after medical injury. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(11):1595–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Mazor KM, Greene SM, Roblin D, Lemay CA, Firneno CL, Calvi J, Prouty CD, Horner K, Gallagher TH. More than words: patients' views on apology and disclosure when things go wrong in cancer care. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90(3):341–6.CrossRefPubMed Mazor KM, Greene SM, Roblin D, Lemay CA, Firneno CL, Calvi J, Prouty CD, Horner K, Gallagher TH. More than words: patients' views on apology and disclosure when things go wrong in cancer care. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90(3):341–6.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Metadata
Title
Openness in the NHS: a secondary longitudinal analysis of national staff and patient surveys
Authors
Imelda McCarthy
Jeremy Dawson
Graham Martin
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05743-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Health Services Research 1/2020 Go to the issue