Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 04-05-2024 | Inguinal Hernia | Original Article

Open vs. robot-assisted preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Are they truly clinically different?

Authors: V. Rodrigues-Gonçalves, M. Verdaguer-Tremolosa, P. Martínez-López, N. Fernandes, R. Bel, M. López-Cano

Published in: Hernia

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Inguinal hernia repair lacks a standard repair technique, with laparo-endoscopic and open preperitoneal methods showing similar outcomes. Despite higher costs, the popularity of robotic surgery is on the rise, driven by technological advantages. Controversies persist in comparing open repair techniques with the robotic approach, given contradictory results. The objective of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes, including complications, chronic pain, and recurrence, between open and robotic-assisted preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study encompassed patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair in a specialized unit, employing both open preperitoneal and robotic-assisted laparoscopic approaches from September 2018 to May 2023. Comparative analysis of short- and long-term outcomes between these techniques was conducted. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression was employed to explore predictors of postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 308 patients met the inclusion criteria. 198 (64%) patients underwent surgery using an open preperitoneal approach and 110 (36%) using robot-assisted laparoscopy. Patients in the robot-assisted group were younger (P = 0.006) and had fewer comorbidities (P < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.133), chronic pain (P = 0.463) or recurrence (P = 0.192). Multivariate analysis identified ASA ≥ III (OR, 1.763; 95%CI, 1.068–3.994; P = 0.027) and inguinoscrotal hernias (OR, 2.371, 95%CI, 1.407–3.944; P = 0.001) as risk factors of postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Both open preperitoneal and robotic-assisted laparoscopic approaches show similar outcomes for complications, chronic pain, and recurrence when performed by experienced surgeons. The open preperitoneal approach, with its quicker operative time, may be advantageous for high-comorbidity cases. Treatment choice should consider patient factors, surgeon experience, and healthcare resources.
Literature
14.
go back to reference Tastaldi L, Barros PHF, Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Rosenblatt S, Petro CC, Alkhatib H, Szutan LA, Silva RA, Olson MA, Stewart TG, Roll S, Rosen MJ, Poulose BK (2020) Hernia recurrence inventory: inguinal hernia recurrence can be accurately assessed using patient-reported outcomes. Hernia 24:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02000-zCrossRefPubMed Tastaldi L, Barros PHF, Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Rosenblatt S, Petro CC, Alkhatib H, Szutan LA, Silva RA, Olson MA, Stewart TG, Roll S, Rosen MJ, Poulose BK (2020) Hernia recurrence inventory: inguinal hernia recurrence can be accurately assessed using patient-reported outcomes. Hernia 24:127–135. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10029-019-02000-zCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Stabilini C, van Veenendaal N, Aasvang E, Agresta F, Aufenacker T, Berrevoet F, Burgmans I, Chen D, de Beaux A, East B, Garcia-Alamino J, Henriksen N, Köckerling F, Kukleta J, Loos M, Lopez-Cano M, Lorenz R, Miserez M, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Oppong C, Pawlak M, Podda M, Reinpold W, Sanders D, Sartori A, Tran HM, Verdaguer M, Wiessner R, Yeboah M, Zwaans W, Simons M (2023) Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management. BJS Open. 7:zrad080. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad080CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stabilini C, van Veenendaal N, Aasvang E, Agresta F, Aufenacker T, Berrevoet F, Burgmans I, Chen D, de Beaux A, East B, Garcia-Alamino J, Henriksen N, Köckerling F, Kukleta J, Loos M, Lopez-Cano M, Lorenz R, Miserez M, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Oppong C, Pawlak M, Podda M, Reinpold W, Sanders D, Sartori A, Tran HM, Verdaguer M, Wiessner R, Yeboah M, Zwaans W, Simons M (2023) Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management. BJS Open. 7:zrad080. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​bjsopen/​zrad080CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference de’Angelis N, Schena CA, Moszkowicz D, Kuperas C, Fara R, Gaujoux S, Gillion JF, Gronnier C, Loriau J, Mathonnet M, Oberlin O, Perez M, Renard Y, Romain B, Passot G, Pessaux P, Association Française de Chirurgie (AFC), Société Française de Chirurgie Pariétale - Club Hernie (SFCP-CH) (2024) Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 38:24–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10545-5CrossRef de’Angelis N, Schena CA, Moszkowicz D, Kuperas C, Fara R, Gaujoux S, Gillion JF, Gronnier C, Loriau J, Mathonnet M, Oberlin O, Perez M, Renard Y, Romain B, Passot G, Pessaux P, Association Française de Chirurgie (AFC), Société Française de Chirurgie Pariétale - Club Hernie (SFCP-CH) (2024) Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 38:24–46. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-023-10545-5CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Open vs. robot-assisted preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Are they truly clinically different?
Authors
V. Rodrigues-Gonçalves
M. Verdaguer-Tremolosa
P. Martínez-López
N. Fernandes
R. Bel
M. López-Cano
Publication date
04-05-2024
Publisher
Springer Paris
Keyword
Inguinal Hernia
Published in
Hernia
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03050-8