Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 2/2018

01-06-2018 | PCL Update (K Jones and M Alaia, section editors)

Open Tibial Inlay PCL Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes

Authors: Evan E. Vellios, Kristofer J. Jones, David R. McAllister

Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To review the current literature on clinical outcomes following open tibial inlay posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction and provide the reader with a detailed description of the author’s preferred surgical technique.

Recent Findings

Despite earlier biomechanical studies which demonstrated superiority of the PCL inlay technique when compared to transtibial techniques, recent longitudinal cohort studies have shown no significant differences in clinical or functional outcomes at 10-year follow-up. Furthermore, no significant clinical differences have been shown between graft types used and/or single- versus double-bundle reconstruction methods.

Summary

The optimal treatment for the PCL-deficient knee remains unclear. Open tibial inlay PCL reconstruction is safe, reproducible, and avoids the “killer turn” that may potentially lead to graft weakening and failure seen in transtibial reconstruction methods. No significant differences in subjective outcomes or clinical laxity have been shown between single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction methods.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miyasaka KC, Daniel DM, Stone ML. The incidence of knee ligament injuries in the general population. Am J Knee Surg. 1991;4:3–8. Miyasaka KC, Daniel DM, Stone ML. The incidence of knee ligament injuries in the general population. Am J Knee Surg. 1991;4:3–8.
2.
go back to reference • Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, McAllister DR. Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84A(4):518–24. Classic biomechanical study showing increased graft thinning and stretch out following cyclic loading in fixed transtibial PCL reconstructions in comparison to fixed tibial inlay methods. CrossRef • Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, McAllister DR. Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84A(4):518–24. Classic biomechanical study showing increased graft thinning and stretch out following cyclic loading in fixed transtibial PCL reconstructions in comparison to fixed tibial inlay methods. CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jakob RP, Ruegsegger M. Therapy of posterior and posterolateral knee instability. Orthopade. 1993;22(6):405–13.PubMed Jakob RP, Ruegsegger M. Therapy of posterior and posterolateral knee instability. Orthopade. 1993;22(6):405–13.PubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Shelbourne KD, Clark M, Gray T. Minimum 10-year follow-up of patients after an acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury treated non-operatively. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7):1526–33.CrossRefPubMed Shelbourne KD, Clark M, Gray T. Minimum 10-year follow-up of patients after an acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury treated non-operatively. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7):1526–33.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Maruyama Y, Shitoto K, Baba T, et al. Evaluation of the clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a comparison between the use of the bone tendon bone and semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation Therapy & Technology. 2012;4(30):1–5. Maruyama Y, Shitoto K, Baba T, et al. Evaluation of the clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a comparison between the use of the bone tendon bone and semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation Therapy & Technology. 2012;4(30):1–5.
7.
go back to reference Ahn JH, Yoo JC, Wang JH. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: double-loop hamstring tendon autograft versus Achilles tendon allograft-clinical results of a minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(8):965–9.CrossRefPubMed Ahn JH, Yoo JC, Wang JH. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: double-loop hamstring tendon autograft versus Achilles tendon allograft-clinical results of a minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(8):965–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Burks RT, Schaffer JT. A simplified approach to the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop. 1990;(254):216–219. Burks RT, Schaffer JT. A simplified approach to the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop. 1990;(254):216–219.
9.
go back to reference Petrigliano FA, Montgomery SR, Johnson JS, McAllister DR. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries. In: Miller MD, Thompson SK, editors. DeLee & Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports Medicine 4th Edition. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2015. Petrigliano FA, Montgomery SR, Johnson JS, McAllister DR. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries. In: Miller MD, Thompson SK, editors. DeLee & Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports Medicine 4th Edition. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2015.
10.
go back to reference Cooper DE, Stewart D. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(2):346–60.CrossRefPubMed Cooper DE, Stewart D. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(2):346–60.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Noyes FR, Barber-Westin S. Posterior cruciate ligament replacement with a two-strand quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft and a tibial inlay technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1241–52.PubMed Noyes FR, Barber-Westin S. Posterior cruciate ligament replacement with a two-strand quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft and a tibial inlay technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1241–52.PubMed
12.
go back to reference • Song EK, Park HW, Ahn YS, et al. Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(12):2964–71. Retrospective cohort study showing no clinically significant difference in functional outcome measures or radiographic evidence of arthritis between patients undergoing transtibial versus inlay PCL reconstruction at an average of 10 years follow-up. CrossRefPubMed • Song EK, Park HW, Ahn YS, et al. Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(12):2964–71. Retrospective cohort study showing no clinically significant difference in functional outcome measures or radiographic evidence of arthritis between patients undergoing transtibial versus inlay PCL reconstruction at an average of 10 years follow-up. CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference • Shin YS, Kim HY, Lee DH. No clinically important difference in knee scores or instability between transtibial and inlay techniques for PCL reconstruction: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;(475):1239–48. Recent review article showing no clinically significant differences in terms of stability or functional outcome scores in patients treated with transtibial or inlay PCL reconstruction techniques. • Shin YS, Kim HY, Lee DH. No clinically important difference in knee scores or instability between transtibial and inlay techniques for PCL reconstruction: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;(475):1239–48. Recent review article showing no clinically significant differences in terms of stability or functional outcome scores in patients treated with transtibial or inlay PCL reconstruction techniques.
15.
go back to reference Seo SS, Seo JH, Kim DH, Park BY. Compression of the popliteal artery after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the tibial inlay technique. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015;27(4):274–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seo SS, Seo JH, Kim DH, Park BY. Compression of the popliteal artery after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the tibial inlay technique. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015;27(4):274–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Open Tibial Inlay PCL Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes
Authors
Evan E. Vellios
Kristofer J. Jones
David R. McAllister
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Issue 2/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-018-9490-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 2/2018 Go to the issue

Advances in Patellofemoral Surgery (L Redler, Section Editor)

Patellofemoral Cartilage Repair

Advances in Patellofemoral Surgery (L Redler, Section Editor)

Patellar Instability in the Skeletally Immature

Advances in Patellofemoral Surgery (L Redler, Section Editor)

The medial patellofemoral complex

PCL Update (K Jones and M Alaia, section editors)

The Role of Osteotomy for the Treatment of PCL Injuries