Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2021

01-10-2021

Open innovation facilitates department-wide engagement in quality improvement: experience from the Massachusetts General Hospital

Authors: Yanik J. Bababekov, Sahael M. Stapleton, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Elan R. Witkowski, Alex B. Haynes, Allan M. Goldstein, John T. Mullen, Eric M. Isselbacher, Keith D. Lillemoe, David C. Chang

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Quality improvement (QI) initiatives commonly originate ‘top-down’ from senior leadership, as staff engagement is often sporadic. We describe our experience with a technology-enabled open innovation contest to encourage participation from multiple stakeholders in a Department of Surgery (DoS) to solicit ideas for QI. We aimed to stimulate engagement and to assist DoS leadership in prioritizing QI initiatives.

Methods

Observational study of a process improvement. The process had five phases: anonymous online submission of ideas by frontline staff; anonymous online crowd-voting to rank ideas on a scale whether the DoS should implement each idea (1 = No, 3 = Maybe, 5 = Yes); ideas with scores ≥ 95th percentile were invited to submit implementation plans; plans were reviewed by a multi-disciplinary panel to select a winning idea; an award ceremony celebrated the completion of the contest.

Results

152 ideas were submitted from 95 staff (n = 850, 11.2%). All Divisions (n = 12) and all staff roles (n = 12) submitted ideas. The greatest number of ideas were submitted by faculty (27.6%), patient service coordinators (18.4%), and residents (17.8%). The most common QI category was access to care (20%). 195 staff (22.9%) cast 3559 votes. The mean score was 3.5 ± 0.5. 10 Ideas were objectively invited to submit implementation plans. One idea was awarded a grand prize of funding, project management, and leadership buy-in.

Conclusion

A web-enabled open innovation contest was successful in engaging faculty, residents, and other critical role groups in QI. It also enabled the leadership to re-affirm a positive culture of inclusivity, maintain an open-door policy, and also democratically vet and prioritize solutions for quality improvement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, Chong V, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JO, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Irvin G III, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first, national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. Ann Surg 228:491–507CrossRef Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, Chong V, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JO, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Irvin G III, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first, national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. Ann Surg 228:491–507CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, Aron DC, Fu P, Koroukian SM (2010) Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA 303:2479–2485CrossRef Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, Aron DC, Fu P, Koroukian SM (2010) Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA 303:2479–2485CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kaye DR, Norton EC, Ellimoottil C, Ye Z, Dupree JM, Herrel LA, Miller DC (2017) Understanding the relationship between the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Hospital Compare star rating, surgical case volume, and short term-outcomes after major cancer surgery. Cancer 123:4259–4267CrossRef Kaye DR, Norton EC, Ellimoottil C, Ye Z, Dupree JM, Herrel LA, Miller DC (2017) Understanding the relationship between the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Hospital Compare star rating, surgical case volume, and short term-outcomes after major cancer surgery. Cancer 123:4259–4267CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Foster GL, Kenward K, Hines S, Joshi MS (2017) The relationship of engagement in improvement practices to outcome measures in large-scale quality improvement initiatives. Am J Med Qual 32:361–368CrossRef Foster GL, Kenward K, Hines S, Joshi MS (2017) The relationship of engagement in improvement practices to outcome measures in large-scale quality improvement initiatives. Am J Med Qual 32:361–368CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tsai TC, Orav EJ, Jha AK (2015) Patient satisfaction and quality of surgical care in US hospitals. Ann Surg 261:2–8CrossRef Tsai TC, Orav EJ, Jha AK (2015) Patient satisfaction and quality of surgical care in US hospitals. Ann Surg 261:2–8CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Osborne NH, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, Thumma JR, Dimick JB (2015) Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 313:496–504CrossRef Osborne NH, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, Thumma JR, Dimick JB (2015) Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 313:496–504CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kafouros MI, Forsans N (2012) The role of open innovation in emerging economies: do companies profit from the scientific knowledge of others? J World Bus 47:362–370CrossRef Kafouros MI, Forsans N (2012) The role of open innovation in emerging economies: do companies profit from the scientific knowledge of others? J World Bus 47:362–370CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Terwiesch C, Mehta SJ, Volpp KG (2013) Innovation in health delivery: the Penn Medicine Innovation Tournament. Healthcare 1:37–41CrossRef Terwiesch C, Mehta SJ, Volpp KG (2013) Innovation in health delivery: the Penn Medicine Innovation Tournament. Healthcare 1:37–41CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Eliott VS, Dekhytyar M, Pouwels MV, Skochelak SE (2019) The American Medical Association Medical Education Innovation Challenge: incorporating the student voice into medical education transformation. Acad Med 94:1343–1346CrossRef Eliott VS, Dekhytyar M, Pouwels MV, Skochelak SE (2019) The American Medical Association Medical Education Innovation Challenge: incorporating the student voice into medical education transformation. Acad Med 94:1343–1346CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick NE, Maier J, Yasko L, Mathias D, Qua K, Wagner E, Miller E, Reis SE (2017) The Pitt Innovation Challenge (PInCh): Driving innovation in translational research through an incentive-based, problem-focused competition. Acad Med 92:671–675CrossRef Fitzpatrick NE, Maier J, Yasko L, Mathias D, Qua K, Wagner E, Miller E, Reis SE (2017) The Pitt Innovation Challenge (PInCh): Driving innovation in translational research through an incentive-based, problem-focused competition. Acad Med 92:671–675CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Singer S, Lin S, Falwell A, Gaba D, Baker L (2009) Relationship of safety climate and safety performance in hospitals. Health Serv Res 44:399–421CrossRef Singer S, Lin S, Falwell A, Gaba D, Baker L (2009) Relationship of safety climate and safety performance in hospitals. Health Serv Res 44:399–421CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tucker AL, Edmondson AC (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. Calif Manag Rev 45:55–72CrossRef Tucker AL, Edmondson AC (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. Calif Manag Rev 45:55–72CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bartek MA, Truitt AR, Widmer-Rodriguez S, Tuia J, Bauer ZA, Comstock BA, Edwards TC, Lawrence SO, Monsell SE, Patrick DL, Jarvik JG, Lavallee DC (2017) The promise and pitfalls of using crowdsourcing in research for back pain: cross-sectional surveys. J Med Internet Res 19:e341CrossRef Bartek MA, Truitt AR, Widmer-Rodriguez S, Tuia J, Bauer ZA, Comstock BA, Edwards TC, Lawrence SO, Monsell SE, Patrick DL, Jarvik JG, Lavallee DC (2017) The promise and pitfalls of using crowdsourcing in research for back pain: cross-sectional surveys. J Med Internet Res 19:e341CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Open innovation facilitates department-wide engagement in quality improvement: experience from the Massachusetts General Hospital
Authors
Yanik J. Bababekov
Sahael M. Stapleton
Daniel A. Hashimoto
Elan R. Witkowski
Alex B. Haynes
Allan M. Goldstein
John T. Mullen
Eric M. Isselbacher
Keith D. Lillemoe
David C. Chang
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08028-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2021 Go to the issue