Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Commentary

“One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?”: American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients

Author: Pamela M. White

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

In January 2016, Melissa Cook, a California gestational surrogate experiencing a multiple-birth pregnancy following the in vitro fertilization (IVF) transfer of three embryos comprised of donor eggs and sperm provided by the intended father, went to the media when the intended father requested that she undergo a fetal reduction because twins were less expensive to raise than triplets. Much of the legal interest in this case to date has centered on the enforceability of surrogacy contracts. However, the Cook case also raises troubling issues about fertility treatment practices involving gestational surrogates, twin preference, and third-party reproduction medical decision-making. This paper focuses on multiple-embryo transfers in the context of US surrogacy arrangements. Offering an original analysis of data obtained from the US national-assisted reproduction registry, it examines single- and multiple-embryo transfer trends over a 12-year period (2003 to 2014). Findings reveal that recommended guidelines were followed in fewer than 42% of the cases in 2014. The paper argues that ensuring equitable medical treatment for all recipients of IVF requires the adoption of treatment guidelines tailored to, and offering protections for, specific patient groups, and that, once in place, guidelines must be robustly implemented.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Traditional English children’s nursery rhyme, c 1780. Traditional English children’s nursery rhyme, c 1780.
3.
go back to reference Melissa K Cook v. Cynthia Anne Harding United States District Court Central District of California, Case No. 2:16-cv-00742 ODW (AFM) June 6, 2016. Melissa K Cook v. Cynthia Anne Harding United States District Court Central District of California, Case No. 2:16-cv-00742 ODW (AFM) June 6, 2016.
4.
go back to reference Johnson v. Calvert (1993) [No. S023721. May 20, 1993]. Johnson v. Calvert (1993) [No. S023721. May 20, 1993].
5.
go back to reference California, AB-1217, C.466 Surrogacy Arrangements, (2011–2012). California, AB-1217, C.466 Surrogacy Arrangements, (2011–2012).
6.
go back to reference Gabry LI. Procreating out pregnancy: surrogacy and the need for a comprehensive regulatory scheme. C J Law Soc Probs. 2012;45:415–50. Gabry LI. Procreating out pregnancy: surrogacy and the need for a comprehensive regulatory scheme. C J Law Soc Probs. 2012;45:415–50.
8.
go back to reference Storrow R. Surrogacy American style. In Surrogacy, law and human rights. In Gerber P. O’Byrne K., editors. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 2015, 193–216. Storrow R. Surrogacy American style. In Surrogacy, law and human rights. In Gerber P. O’Byrne K., editors. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 2015, 193–216.
9.
go back to reference Ragoné H. Incontestable motivations. In Franklin S. Ragoné H., editors, Reproducing reproduction: kinship, power and technological innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998, pp.118-31. Ragoné H. Incontestable motivations. In Franklin S. Ragoné H., editors, Reproducing reproduction: kinship, power and technological innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998, pp.118-31.
11.
go back to reference Perkins KM, Boulet SL, Jamieson DL, Kissin DM. Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:435–42. Perkins KM, Boulet SL, Jamieson DL, Kissin DM. Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:435–42.
12.
go back to reference White PM. Hidden from view: Canadian gestational surrogacy practices and outcomes, 2001–2012. Reprod Health Matters. 2016;24:205–17.CrossRefPubMed White PM. Hidden from view: Canadian gestational surrogacy practices and outcomes, 2001–2012. Reprod Health Matters. 2016;24:205–17.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Davidson CM. Octomom and multi-fetal pregnancies: why federal legislation should require insurers to cover in vitro fertilization. William Mary J Women Law. 2010;17:135–86. Davidson CM. Octomom and multi-fetal pregnancies: why federal legislation should require insurers to cover in vitro fertilization. William Mary J Women Law. 2010;17:135–86.
15.
go back to reference Kawwass JF, Monsour M, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Kulkarni AD, et al. Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000–2010. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310(22):2426–34. Kawwass JF, Monsour M, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Kulkarni AD, et al. Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000–2010. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310(22):2426–34.
16.
go back to reference Acharya KS, Keyhan S, Acharya CR, Yeh JS, Provost MP, Goldfarb JM, et al. Do donor oocyte cycles comply with ASRM/SART embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 13,393 donor cycles from the SART registry. Fertil Steril. 2016;103:603–7.CrossRef Acharya KS, Keyhan S, Acharya CR, Yeh JS, Provost MP, Goldfarb JM, et al. Do donor oocyte cycles comply with ASRM/SART embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 13,393 donor cycles from the SART registry. Fertil Steril. 2016;103:603–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 (FCSRC) Pub, L No.102-493 (October 24, 1992). Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 (FCSRC) Pub, L No.102-493 (October 24, 1992).
18.
go back to reference Price F. Establishing Guidelines and Regulations: The Clinical management of Fertility. In Birthright: Law an Ethics at the Beginning of Life. In R. Lee R. Morgan D. editors, London: Routledge. 1989, p.42. Price F. Establishing Guidelines and Regulations: The Clinical management of Fertility. In Birthright: Law an Ethics at the Beginning of Life. In R. Lee R. Morgan D. editors, London: Routledge. 1989, p.42.
19.
go back to reference Seppälä M. The world collaborative report on in vitro fertilization and embryo replacement: current state of the art in January 1984. In Seppälä M. and R.G. Edwards R.G. editors. In Vitro Fertilisation and Embryo Transfer. Annals of New York Academy of Science 1985; 442: 558–63. Seppälä M. The world collaborative report on in vitro fertilization and embryo replacement: current state of the art in January 1984. In Seppälä M. and R.G. Edwards R.G. editors. In Vitro Fertilisation and Embryo Transfer. Annals of New York Academy of Science 1985; 442: 558–63.
20.
go back to reference Price F. Establishing guidelines and regulations: the clinical management of fertility. In Birthright: law an ethics at the beginning of life. In R. Lee R. Morgan D. editors, London: Routledge. 1989, pp. 37–55. Price F. Establishing guidelines and regulations: the clinical management of fertility. In Birthright: law an ethics at the beginning of life. In R. Lee R. Morgan D. editors, London: Routledge. 1989, pp. 37–55.
21.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Educational bulletin. Special problems of multiple gestation. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1989 (revised 1999) 64:323–33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Educational bulletin. Special problems of multiple gestation. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1989 (revised 1999) 64:323–33.
26.
go back to reference Robertson JA. Procreative liberty and harm to offspring in assisted reproduction. Am J Law Med. 2004;30:7–40.CrossRefPubMed Robertson JA. Procreative liberty and harm to offspring in assisted reproduction. Am J Law Med. 2004;30:7–40.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Daar J. Federalizing embryo transfers: taming the wild west of reproductive medicine? C J Gend Law. 2012;23:257–325. Daar J. Federalizing embryo transfers: taming the wild west of reproductive medicine? C J Gend Law. 2012;23:257–325.
29.
go back to reference Cahn NR. Collins JM. Eight is enough. Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy 2009; 103: 501–13. Cahn NR. Collins JM. Eight is enough. Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy 2009; 103: 501–13.
30.
go back to reference Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:731–7.CrossRefPubMed Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:731–7.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
go back to reference Expert Panel on Infertility and Adoption. 2009. Raising expectations. Toronto: Ontario Government. Expert Panel on Infertility and Adoption. 2009. Raising expectations. Toronto: Ontario Government.
33.
go back to reference MacKay AP, Berg JC, King JC, Duran C, Chang J. Pregnancy-related mortality among women with multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:563–8.CrossRefPubMed MacKay AP, Berg JC, King JC, Duran C, Chang J. Pregnancy-related mortality among women with multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:563–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Sazonova A, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Ulla-Britt Wennerholm U-B, Bergh C. Neonatal and maternal outcomes comparing women undergoing two in vitro fertilization (IVF) singleton pregnancies and women undergoing one IVF twin pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:731–7.CrossRefPubMed Sazonova A, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Ulla-Britt Wennerholm U-B, Bergh C. Neonatal and maternal outcomes comparing women undergoing two in vitro fertilization (IVF) singleton pregnancies and women undergoing one IVF twin pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:731–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Stillman RJ, Richter KJ, Jones Jr HW. Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2599–607.CrossRefPubMed Stillman RJ, Richter KJ, Jones Jr HW. Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2599–607.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Koivurova S, Hartikainen AL, Gissler M, Hemminki, Klemetti R, Jarvelin MR. Health care costs resulting from IVF: prenatal and neonatal periods. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2798–805.CrossRefPubMed Koivurova S, Hartikainen AL, Gissler M, Hemminki, Klemetti R, Jarvelin MR. Health care costs resulting from IVF: prenatal and neonatal periods. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2798–805.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Klock SC. Psychological adjustment to twins after infertility. Best practice and research. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;18:645–56. Klock SC. Psychological adjustment to twins after infertility. Best practice and research. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;18:645–56.
38.
go back to reference Bissonnette F, Phillips S, Gunby J, Holzer H, Mahutte N, St-Michel P, et al. Working to eliminate multiple pregnancies: a success story in Québec. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:500–4.CrossRefPubMed Bissonnette F, Phillips S, Gunby J, Holzer H, Mahutte N, St-Michel P, et al. Working to eliminate multiple pregnancies: a success story in Québec. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:500–4.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Ferraretti AP, Goossen V, de Mouzon J, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Korsak V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2571–84.CrossRefPubMed Ferraretti AP, Goossen V, de Mouzon J, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Korsak V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2571–84.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Chambers GM, Hoang VP, Sullivan EA, Chapman MG, Ishihara O, Zegers-Hochschild F, et al. The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:191–8.CrossRefPubMed Chambers GM, Hoang VP, Sullivan EA, Chapman MG, Ishihara O, Zegers-Hochschild F, et al. The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:191–8.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference De Neubourg D, Bogaerts K, Wyns C, Albert A, Camus M, et al. The history of Belgian assisted reproduction technology cycle registration and control: a case study in reducing the incidence of multiple pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2709–19.CrossRefPubMed De Neubourg D, Bogaerts K, Wyns C, Albert A, Camus M, et al. The history of Belgian assisted reproduction technology cycle registration and control: a case study in reducing the incidence of multiple pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2709–19.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Karletröm PO, Bergh C. Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden: Impact on delivery and multiple birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2202–7.CrossRef Karletröm PO, Bergh C. Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden: Impact on delivery and multiple birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2202–7.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Velez MP, Connelly MP, Kadoch IJ, Phillips S, Bissonnette F. Universal coverage of IVF pays off. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1313–9.CrossRefPubMed Velez MP, Connelly MP, Kadoch IJ, Phillips S, Bissonnette F. Universal coverage of IVF pays off. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1313–9.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Kresowick JD, Stegmann BJ, Sparks AE, Ryan GL, van Voorhis BJ. Five years of mandatory single-embryo transfer (mSET) policy dramatically reduces twinning rate without lowering pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1367–9.CrossRef Kresowick JD, Stegmann BJ, Sparks AE, Ryan GL, van Voorhis BJ. Five years of mandatory single-embryo transfer (mSET) policy dramatically reduces twinning rate without lowering pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1367–9.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Harbottle S, Hughes C, Cutting R, Roberts S, Brison D, On behalf of the Association of Clinical Embryologists & The (ACE) British Fertility Society (BFS). Elective single embryo transfer: an update to UK best practice guidelines. Hum Fertil. 2015;18:165–83.CrossRef Harbottle S, Hughes C, Cutting R, Roberts S, Brison D, On behalf of the Association of Clinical Embryologists & The (ACE) British Fertility Society (BFS). Elective single embryo transfer: an update to UK best practice guidelines. Hum Fertil. 2015;18:165–83.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Regina (Assisted Reproduction and Gynaecology Centre and Another) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2013] EWHC 3087 (Admin) [2013] WLR (D) 416. Regina (Assisted Reproduction and Gynaecology Centre and Another) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2013] EWHC 3087 (Admin) [2013] WLR (D) 416.
48.
go back to reference Martin JR, Bromer JG, Sakkas D, Patrizio P. Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:964–9.CrossRefPubMed Martin JR, Bromer JG, Sakkas D, Patrizio P. Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:964–9.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Buckles KS. Infertility insurance mandates and multiple birth rates. Health Econ. 2013;22:775–89.CrossRefPubMed Buckles KS. Infertility insurance mandates and multiple birth rates. Health Econ. 2013;22:775–89.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Boulet SL, Crawford S, Zhang Y, Sunderham S, Cohen B, Bernson D, et al. Embryo transfer practice and perinatal outcomes by insurance mandate status. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:403–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boulet SL, Crawford S, Zhang Y, Sunderham S, Cohen B, Bernson D, et al. Embryo transfer practice and perinatal outcomes by insurance mandate status. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:403–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference Crawford S. Boulet SL. Jamieson DL. Stone C. Mullen J. Kissin DM. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey, and Connecticut. Fertility and Sterility 2016;105: 347–55 at 349. Crawford S. Boulet SL. Jamieson DL. Stone C. Mullen J. Kissin DM. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey, and Connecticut. Fertility and Sterility 2016;105: 347–55 at 349.
52.
go back to reference Monteleone PAA, Mirisola RJ, Gonçalves SP, Baracat EC, Serafini PC. Outcomes of elective cryopreserved single or double embryo transfers following failure to conceive after fresh single embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;33:161–7.CrossRefPubMed Monteleone PAA, Mirisola RJ, Gonçalves SP, Baracat EC, Serafini PC. Outcomes of elective cryopreserved single or double embryo transfers following failure to conceive after fresh single embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;33:161–7.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Tremellen K, Wilkinson D, Savulescu J. Is mandating elective single embryo transfer ethically justifiable in young women? Reprod BioMed Soc Online. 2016;1:81–7.CrossRef Tremellen K, Wilkinson D, Savulescu J. Is mandating elective single embryo transfer ethically justifiable in young women? Reprod BioMed Soc Online. 2016;1:81–7.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Adamson D. Regulation of assisted reproductive technologies in the United States. Family Law Q. 2005;39:727–44. Adamson D. Regulation of assisted reproductive technologies in the United States. Family Law Q. 2005;39:727–44.
55.
go back to reference Preisler A. Assisted reproductive technology: the dangers of an unregulated market and the need for reform. DePaul J Health Care Law. 2013;15:213–36. Preisler A. Assisted reproductive technology: the dangers of an unregulated market and the need for reform. DePaul J Health Care Law. 2013;15:213–36.
56.
go back to reference Thompson C. Making parents: the ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge: Mass: MIT Press; 2005. Thompson C. Making parents: the ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge: Mass: MIT Press; 2005.
57.
go back to reference Jain T. Missmer SA. Hornstein MD. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine 2004; 350: 1639–45 at 1642. Jain T. Missmer SA. Hornstein MD. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine 2004; 350: 1639–45 at 1642.
58.
go back to reference Tasdemir M, Tasdemir I, Kodama H, Fukuda J, Tanaka T. Two instead of three embryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2155–8.CrossRefPubMed Tasdemir M, Tasdemir I, Kodama H, Fukuda J, Tanaka T. Two instead of three embryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2155–8.CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Roest JP, Mous HVH, van Heusden AM, Zeilmaker GH, Verhoeff A. A triplet pregnancy after in vitro fertilization is a procedure-related complication that should be prevented by replacement of two embryos only. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:290–5.CrossRefPubMed Roest JP, Mous HVH, van Heusden AM, Zeilmaker GH, Verhoeff A. A triplet pregnancy after in vitro fertilization is a procedure-related complication that should be prevented by replacement of two embryos only. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:290–5.CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Templeton A, Morris JK. Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilitzation. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:573–7.CrossRefPubMed Templeton A, Morris JK. Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilitzation. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:573–7.CrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Viska S, Tiitinen A, Hyden-Granskog C, Hovatta O. Elective transfer of embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple births. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2392–5.CrossRef Viska S, Tiitinen A, Hyden-Granskog C, Hovatta O. Elective transfer of embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple births. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2392–5.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Martin JA. Park MA. Trends in twin and triplet births: 1980–97. National Vital Statistics Reports September 14 1999; 47(24). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Martin JA. Park MA. Trends in twin and triplet births: 1980–97. National Vital Statistics Reports September 14 1999; 47(24). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
63.
go back to reference Ryan M. The cost of longing. 2001. Georgetown University Press. Ryan M. The cost of longing. 2001. Georgetown University Press.
64.
go back to reference American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Practice Committee opinion: guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Birmingham, AL: American Society for Assisted Reproductive Medicine; 1998. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Practice Committee opinion: guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Birmingham, AL: American Society for Assisted Reproductive Medicine; 1998.
65.
go back to reference American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Practice Committee opinion: guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Birmingham, AL: American Society for Assisted Reproductive Medicine; 1999. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Practice Committee opinion: guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Birmingham, AL: American Society for Assisted Reproductive Medicine; 1999.
66.
go back to reference Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:773–84.CrossRef Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:773–84.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Stern JE, Ceders MI, Jain T. Assisted reproduction technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:275–82.CrossRefPubMed Stern JE, Ceders MI, Jain T. Assisted reproduction technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:275–82.CrossRefPubMed
68.
go back to reference Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:S51–2. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:S51–2.
69.
go back to reference Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S163–4. Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S163–4.
70.
go back to reference Stillman RJ. The Suleman octuplets: what can an aberration teach us? Fertil Steril. 2010;93:341–3.CrossRefPubMed Stillman RJ. The Suleman octuplets: what can an aberration teach us? Fertil Steril. 2010;93:341–3.CrossRefPubMed
71.
go back to reference Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1518–9.CrossRef Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1518–9.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Criteria for number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:44–6.CrossRef Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Criteria for number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:44–6.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Kissin DM, Kulkarni AD, Mneimneh A, Warner L, Boulet SL, Crawford S, et al. Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:954–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kissin DM, Kulkarni AD, Mneimneh A, Warner L, Boulet SL, Crawford S, et al. Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:954–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
74.
go back to reference Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, and Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:835–42.CrossRef Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, and Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:835–42.CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ, Jones Jr HW, Kissin DM, Gallo MF, Macaluso M, et al. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2218–25.CrossRefPubMed Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ, Jones Jr HW, Kissin DM, Gallo MF, Macaluso M, et al. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2218–25.CrossRefPubMed
76.
go back to reference Hamilton BE. Martin JA. Osterman MJK. Curtin SC. Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2014. National Vital Statistics Reports 2015; 66. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hamilton BE. Martin JA. Osterman MJK. Curtin SC. Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2014. National Vital Statistics Reports 2015; 66. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
77.
go back to reference Tymstra T. At least we tried everything: about binary thinking, anticipated decision regret, and the imperative character of medical technology. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2007;28:131.CrossRef Tymstra T. At least we tried everything: about binary thinking, anticipated decision regret, and the imperative character of medical technology. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2007;28:131.CrossRef
78.
go back to reference Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S, Heineman M-J, Korevaar JC, Bossuyt PMM. Preferences of sub-fertile women regarding elective single embryo transfer: additional in vitro fertilization cycles are acceptable, lower pregnancy rates are not. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1006–9.CrossRefPubMed Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S, Heineman M-J, Korevaar JC, Bossuyt PMM. Preferences of sub-fertile women regarding elective single embryo transfer: additional in vitro fertilization cycles are acceptable, lower pregnancy rates are not. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1006–9.CrossRefPubMed
79.
go back to reference Leese B, Denton J. Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review. Hum Fertil. 2010;13:28–34.CrossRef Leese B, Denton J. Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review. Hum Fertil. 2010;13:28–34.CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Kovacs P. Commentary: will patients accept fewer embryo transfers? Medscape. July 21, 2015. Kovacs P. Commentary: will patients accept fewer embryo transfers? Medscape. July 21, 2015.
81.
go back to reference Teman E. Birthing a mother. Los Angles: University of California Press; 2010.CrossRef Teman E. Birthing a mother. Los Angles: University of California Press; 2010.CrossRef
82.
go back to reference Ashenden S. Reproblematising relations of agency and coercion: surrogacy. In Gender, agency and coercion. In S. Madhock S. Phillips A. Wilson K. 2013. Bassingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2013, pp. 195–218. Ashenden S. Reproblematising relations of agency and coercion: surrogacy. In Gender, agency and coercion. In S. Madhock S. Phillips A. Wilson K. 2013. Bassingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2013, pp. 195–218.
83.
go back to reference Radin M. Contested commodities. 1996. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press. Radin M. Contested commodities. 1996. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.
84.
go back to reference Shapiro J. For a feminist considering surrogacy, is compensation really the key question? Wash Law Rev. 2014;89:1345–73. Shapiro J. For a feminist considering surrogacy, is compensation really the key question? Wash Law Rev. 2014;89:1345–73.
85.
go back to reference Ainsworth S. Bearing children, bearing risks: feminist leadership for progressive regulation of compensated surrogacy in the United States. Wash Law Rev. 2014;89:1077–123. Ainsworth S. Bearing children, bearing risks: feminist leadership for progressive regulation of compensated surrogacy in the United States. Wash Law Rev. 2014;89:1077–123.
86.
go back to reference Phillips A. Our bodies: whose property? Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013. Phillips A. Our bodies: whose property? Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013.
87.
go back to reference Child–parent Security Act, Assemb. B. 4319, 2015 Assemb., Reg. Sess. (N.Y. 2016) Child–parent Security Act, Assemb. B. 4319, 2015 Assemb., Reg. Sess. (N.Y. 2016)
88.
go back to reference D’Alton-Harrison R. Mater semper incertus est: who’s your mummy? Medical Law Review 2014. 22, no.3: 357–83. D’Alton-Harrison R. Mater semper incertus est: who’s your mummy? Medical Law Review 2014. 22, no.3: 357–83.
89.
go back to reference Hinson DS. McBrien M. Surrogacy across America. Family Advocate 2011–12; 34: 32–6. Hinson DS. McBrien M. Surrogacy across America. Family Advocate 2011–12; 34: 32–6.
90.
go back to reference Finkelstein A. MacDougall S. Kintominas A. Olsen A. Surrogacy law and policy in the U.S.: a national conversation informed by global lawmaking. Report of the Columbia Law School, Sexuality & Gender Law Clinic. 2016. Finkelstein A. MacDougall S. Kintominas A. Olsen A. Surrogacy law and policy in the U.S.: a national conversation informed by global lawmaking. Report of the Columbia Law School, Sexuality & Gender Law Clinic. 2016.
91.
go back to reference American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2013. Consideration of the gestational carrier: a committee opinion. www.arsm.org. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2013. Consideration of the gestational carrier: a committee opinion. www.​arsm.​org.
92.
go back to reference Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:e1–e18.CrossRef Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:e1–e18.CrossRef
93.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion. Family building through gestational surrogacy. Am College Obstet Gynecologists. 2016;660:1–7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion. Family building through gestational surrogacy. Am College Obstet Gynecologists. 2016;660:1–7.
94.
go back to reference Bernstein G. Unintended consequences: prohibitions on gamete donor anonymity and the fragile practice of surrogacy. Indiana Health Law Rev. 2013;10:291–324. Bernstein G. Unintended consequences: prohibitions on gamete donor anonymity and the fragile practice of surrogacy. Indiana Health Law Rev. 2013;10:291–324.
95.
go back to reference Söderström-Anttila V. Wennerholm U-B. Loft A. Pinborg A. Aittomaki K. Romundstad LB. Berg C. Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update 22, 2016; 2: 260–76. Söderström-Anttila V. Wennerholm U-B. Loft A. Pinborg A. Aittomaki K. Romundstad LB. Berg C. Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update 22, 2016; 2: 260–76.
96.
go back to reference American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Multiple pregnancy and birth: twins, triplets, and high-order multiples: a guide for patients. 2012. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Multiple pregnancy and birth: twins, triplets, and high-order multiples: a guide for patients. 2012.
97.
go back to reference Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 2015;103: e1-8 at e3. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 2015;103: e1-8 at e3.
98.
go back to reference Shenfield F, Pennings G, Cohen J, Devroey P, de Wert G, Tarlatzis B. ESHRE task force on ethics and law 10: surrogacy. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2705–7.CrossRefPubMed Shenfield F, Pennings G, Cohen J, Devroey P, de Wert G, Tarlatzis B. ESHRE task force on ethics and law 10: surrogacy. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2705–7.CrossRefPubMed
99.
go back to reference Shenfield F, Pennings G, De Mouzon J, Ferraretti AP, Goossens V. ESHRE’s good practice guide for cross-border reproductive care for centers and practitioners. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1625–7.CrossRefPubMed Shenfield F, Pennings G, De Mouzon J, Ferraretti AP, Goossens V. ESHRE’s good practice guide for cross-border reproductive care for centers and practitioners. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1625–7.CrossRefPubMed
100.
go back to reference Melissa Kay Cook, et al. v. Cynthia Anne Harding, et al., California Central District Court, 2:16-cv-00742 2016 WL, February 2, 2016 at 52. Melissa Kay Cook, et al. v. Cynthia Anne Harding, et al., California Central District Court, 2:16-cv-00742 2016 WL, February 2, 2016 at 52.
101.
go back to reference National ART Surveillance System (NASS) tabular data provided on request by the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, August 8, 2015, April 11, 2016, December 16 and 29, 2016. National ART Surveillance System (NASS) tabular data provided on request by the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, August 8, 2015, April 11, 2016, December 16 and 29, 2016.  
103.
go back to reference Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T. When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk? Int J Public Health. 2008;53:165–7.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T. When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk? Int J Public Health. 2008;53:165–7.CrossRefPubMed
104.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion. Family building through gestational surrogacy. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. March 2016; 660:3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion. Family building through gestational surrogacy. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. March 2016; 660:3.
105.
go back to reference Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 2015; 103: e3 and e.5. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 2015; 103: e3 and e.5.
106.
go back to reference Melissa Kay Cook v. Cynthia Anne Harding. Case no. 2:16-cv-00742-ODW (AFM) Document 92,06.06.16. Order Granting Defendants Motions to Dismiss [44,46,54, 60] 2159 at 2165, lines 11–17. Melissa Kay Cook v. Cynthia Anne Harding. Case no. 2:16-cv-00742-ODW (AFM) Document 92,06.06.16. Order Granting Defendants Motions to Dismiss [44,46,54, 60] 2159 at 2165, lines 11–17.
107.
go back to reference 2016 WL 424998 (C.D.Cal.) (Trial Pleading) United States District Court, C.D. California. Los Angeles Division Melissa Kay COOK et al. v. Cynthia Anne Harding M.P.H., et al. No. 2:16-CV-00742 at 62. 2016 WL 424998 (C.D.Cal.) (Trial Pleading) United States District Court, C.D. California. Los Angeles Division Melissa Kay COOK et al. v. Cynthia Anne Harding M.P.H., et al. No. 2:16-CV-00742 at 62.
108.
go back to reference Gleicher N. The irrational attraction of elective single-embryo transfer (eSET). Hum Reprod. 2013;28:294–7.CrossRefPubMed Gleicher N. The irrational attraction of elective single-embryo transfer (eSET). Hum Reprod. 2013;28:294–7.CrossRefPubMed
109.
go back to reference Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Barad DH. Risks of spontaneously an IVF-conceived singleton and twin pregnancies differ, requiring reassessment of statistics premises favoring elective single embryo transfer (eSET). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14:25–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Barad DH. Risks of spontaneously an IVF-conceived singleton and twin pregnancies differ, requiring reassessment of statistics premises favoring elective single embryo transfer (eSET). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14:25–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
110.
go back to reference Beeson D, Darnovsky M, Lippman A. What’s in a name? Variations in terminology of third-party reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:805–15.CrossRefPubMed Beeson D, Darnovsky M, Lippman A. What’s in a name? Variations in terminology of third-party reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:805–15.CrossRefPubMed
111.
go back to reference Lupton D. Social worlds of the unborn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.CrossRef Lupton D. Social worlds of the unborn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.CrossRef
112.
go back to reference Fuchs EL, Berenson AB. Screening of gestational carriers in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1496–502.CrossRefPubMed Fuchs EL, Berenson AB. Screening of gestational carriers in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1496–502.CrossRefPubMed
113.
go back to reference Beck H. The legalization of emotion: managing risk by managing feelings in contracts for surrogate labor. Law Soc Rev. 2015;49:143–77.CrossRef Beck H. The legalization of emotion: managing risk by managing feelings in contracts for surrogate labor. Law Soc Rev. 2015;49:143–77.CrossRef
114.
go back to reference Family Building Act H.R. 697, 111th Cong. (1st Sess. 2009). Family Building Act H.R. 697, 111th Cong. (1st Sess. 2009).
116.
go back to reference Rosenthal Marie. Aetna follows best practices for IVF procedures: incentives lower multiple births. Managed Healthcare Executive. April 1. 2013. Rosenthal Marie. Aetna follows best practices for IVF procedures: incentives lower multiple births. Managed Healthcare Executive. April 1. 2013.
117.
go back to reference Johnston J, Gusmano MK, Patrizio P. In search of real autonomy for fertility patients. Health Econ Policy Law. 2015;10:243–50.CrossRefPubMed Johnston J, Gusmano MK, Patrizio P. In search of real autonomy for fertility patients. Health Econ Policy Law. 2015;10:243–50.CrossRefPubMed
118.
go back to reference Mid-South Insurance Co. vs. Doe, 2:02-1789-18, 274 F.Supp.2d 757 (D.S.C. 07/29/03). Mid-South Insurance Co. vs. Doe, 2:02-1789-18, 274 F.Supp.2d 757 (D.S.C. 07/29/03).
119.
120.
go back to reference Robert R. 2011. The common core standards and next chapter in American education. 2011. Cambridge Mass: Harvard Education Press. Robert R. 2011. The common core standards and next chapter in American education. 2011. Cambridge Mass: Harvard Education Press.
121.
go back to reference Explicit reference to counselling: Virginia (§ 20–156 to 20–165); Texas TFC Chapter 160; Louisiana 2016 HB NO. 1102, Part III D. Explicit reference to counselling: Virginia (§ 20–156 to 20–165); Texas TFC Chapter 160; Louisiana 2016 HB NO. 1102, Part III D.
122.
124.
Metadata
Title
“One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?”: American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients
Author
Pamela M. White
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0885-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2017 Go to the issue