Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 5/2011

Open Access 01-05-2011 | Original Article

One-day versus 3-day suprapubic catheterization after vaginal prolapse surgery: a prospective randomized trial

Authors: Annemarie Van Der Steen, Renee Detollenaere, Jan Den Boon, Hugo Van Eijndhoven

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

For prolonged catheterization after vaginal prolapse surgery with anterior colporrhaphy, the optimal duration to prevent overdistention of the bladder remains unknown. We designed this study to determine the optimal length of catheterization.

Methods

We conducted a prospective randomized trial in which 179 women were allocated to 1-day or 3-day suprapubic catheterization. The primary outcome was the duration of catheterization.

Results

Mean duration of catheterization and hospital stay was significantly shorter in the 1-day catheterization group. The number of successful voiding trials was higher in the 3-day catheterization group (90.9% versus 79.3%), but this did not reach statistical significance. The percentage of urinary tract infection did not differ significantly between the groups (4.5% versus 2.4%).

Conclusion

Starting a voiding trial 1 day after vaginal prolapse surgery leads to shorter duration of catheterization and hospital stay.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hakvoort RA, Burger MP, Emanuel MH, Roovers JP (2009) A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 20:813–818CrossRef Hakvoort RA, Burger MP, Emanuel MH, Roovers JP (2009) A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 20:813–818CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Glavind K, Mørup L, Madsen H, Glavind J (2007) A prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing 3 hour and 24 hour postoperative removal of bladder catheter and vaginal pack following vaginal prolapse surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:1122–1125PubMedCrossRef Glavind K, Mørup L, Madsen H, Glavind J (2007) A prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing 3 hour and 24 hour postoperative removal of bladder catheter and vaginal pack following vaginal prolapse surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:1122–1125PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ottesen M, Sørensen M, Rasmussen Y, Smidt-Jensen S, Kehlet H, Ottesen B (2002) Fast track vaginal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:138–146PubMedCrossRef Ottesen M, Sørensen M, Rasmussen Y, Smidt-Jensen S, Kehlet H, Ottesen B (2002) Fast track vaginal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:138–146PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hakvoort RA, Elberink R, Vollebregt A, Van der Ploeg T, Emanuel MH (2004) How long should bladder catheterisation be continued after vaginal prolapse surgery? a randomised controlled trial comparing short term versus long term catheterisation after vaginal prolapse surgery. BJOG 111:828–830PubMedCrossRef Hakvoort RA, Elberink R, Vollebregt A, Van der Ploeg T, Emanuel MH (2004) How long should bladder catheterisation be continued after vaginal prolapse surgery? a randomised controlled trial comparing short term versus long term catheterisation after vaginal prolapse surgery. BJOG 111:828–830PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schiøtz HA (1995) Comparison of 1 and 3 days’ transurethral Foley catheterization after vaginal plastic surgery. Int Urogynecol J 6:158–161CrossRef Schiøtz HA (1995) Comparison of 1 and 3 days’ transurethral Foley catheterization after vaginal plastic surgery. Int Urogynecol J 6:158–161CrossRef
Metadata
Title
One-day versus 3-day suprapubic catheterization after vaginal prolapse surgery: a prospective randomized trial
Authors
Annemarie Van Der Steen
Renee Detollenaere
Jan Den Boon
Hugo Van Eijndhoven
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1358-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

International Urogynecology Journal 5/2011 Go to the issue