Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 6/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Original Paper

On the regional variability of averaged cell area estimates for the human corneal endothelium in relation to the extent of polymegethism

Author: M. J. Doughty

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess variability in the coefficient of variation (COV) in cell area estimates when using different numbers of cells for endothelial morphometry.

Methods

Using non-contact specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium, 4 sets of 20 cases were selected that included 200 cells and had overall (global) COV values of less than 30 (group 1), 31–40 (group 2), 41–50 (group 3) and over 50% (group 4). Subjects could be normal, or had ophthalmic disease (such as diabetes), a history of rigid or soft contact lens wear or were assessed after cataract surgery. A step-wise analysis was undertaken, 20 cells at a time, of the variability in cell area estimates when using different numbers of cells for the calculations.

Results

Variability in the average cell area values was higher if only 20–60 cells were used in the calculations and then tended to decrease. The standard deviation values on these average cell area values and the calculated COV showed the same overall trends and were more than twice as large for endothelia with marked polymegethism. Using more than 100 cells/image in markedly polymegethous endothelia only increased the variability in the calculations.

Conclusions

These analyses indicate that substantial region variability in cell area values can be expected in polymegethous endothelia. The analysis further confirm that using only small numbers of cells (e.g. less than 50/image) in such cases is likely to yield far less reliable estimates of COV.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Doughty MJ (1998) Are there geometric determinants of cell area in rabbit and human corneal endothelial cell monolayers? Tissue Cell 30:537–544CrossRef Doughty MJ (1998) Are there geometric determinants of cell area in rabbit and human corneal endothelial cell monolayers? Tissue Cell 30:537–544CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Doughty MJ (2012) Comparative anatomy and physiology of the cornea and conjunctiva. In: Martin Herran R, Corrales RM (eds) Ocular surface. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 32–78CrossRef Doughty MJ (2012) Comparative anatomy and physiology of the cornea and conjunctiva. In: Martin Herran R, Corrales RM (eds) Ocular surface. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 32–78CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Doughty MJ (1989) Towards a quantitative analysis of corneal endothelial cell morphology: a review of techniques and their application. Optom Vis Sci 66:626–642CrossRef Doughty MJ (1989) Towards a quantitative analysis of corneal endothelial cell morphology: a review of techniques and their application. Optom Vis Sci 66:626–642CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hirst LW, Yamauchi K, Enger C, Vogelpohl W, Whittington V (1989) Quantitative analysis of wide-field specular microscopy. II. Precision of sampling from the central corneal endothelium. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:1972–1979 Hirst LW, Yamauchi K, Enger C, Vogelpohl W, Whittington V (1989) Quantitative analysis of wide-field specular microscopy. II. Precision of sampling from the central corneal endothelium. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:1972–1979
5.
go back to reference Doughty MJ, Fonn D, Nguyen T (1993) Assessment of the reliability of calculations of the coefficient of variation of normal and polymegethous corneal endothelium. Optom Vis Sci 70:759–770CrossRef Doughty MJ, Fonn D, Nguyen T (1993) Assessment of the reliability of calculations of the coefficient of variation of normal and polymegethous corneal endothelium. Optom Vis Sci 70:759–770CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Doughty MJ (1990) The ambiguous coefficient of variation, polymegethism of the corneal endothelium and central corneal thickness. Int Contact Lens Clin 17:240–247CrossRef Doughty MJ (1990) The ambiguous coefficient of variation, polymegethism of the corneal endothelium and central corneal thickness. Int Contact Lens Clin 17:240–247CrossRef
7.
go back to reference McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF, Lynn MJ (2008) Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions. Cornea 27:1–16CrossRef McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF, Lynn MJ (2008) Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions. Cornea 27:1–16CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gasser L, Reinhard T, Böhringer D (2015) Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes. BMC Ophthalmol 15:87CrossRef Gasser L, Reinhard T, Böhringer D (2015) Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes. BMC Ophthalmol 15:87CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Luft N, Hirnschall N, Schuschitz S, Draschl P, Findl O (2015) Comparison of 4 specular microscopes in healthy eyes and eyes with cornea guttata or corneal grafts. Cornea 34:381–386CrossRef Luft N, Hirnschall N, Schuschitz S, Draschl P, Findl O (2015) Comparison of 4 specular microscopes in healthy eyes and eyes with cornea guttata or corneal grafts. Cornea 34:381–386CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Szalai E, Németh G, Berta A, Módis L (2011) Evaluation of the corneal endothelium using noncontact and contact specular microscopy. Cornea 30:567–570CrossRef Szalai E, Németh G, Berta A, Módis L (2011) Evaluation of the corneal endothelium using noncontact and contact specular microscopy. Cornea 30:567–570CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Garza-Leon M (2016) Corneal endothelial cell analysis using two non-contact specular microscopes in healthy subjects. Int Ophthalmol 36:453–461CrossRef Garza-Leon M (2016) Corneal endothelial cell analysis using two non-contact specular microscopes in healthy subjects. Int Ophthalmol 36:453–461CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Van Schaick W, Van Dooren BTH, Mulder PGH, Völker-Dieben HJM (2005) Validity of endothelial cell analysis methods and recommendations for calibration in Topcon SP-2000P specular microscopy. Cornea 24:538–544CrossRef Van Schaick W, Van Dooren BTH, Mulder PGH, Völker-Dieben HJM (2005) Validity of endothelial cell analysis methods and recommendations for calibration in Topcon SP-2000P specular microscopy. Cornea 24:538–544CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kim EC, Kim MS (2010) A comparison of endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification in penetrating keratoplasty patients and normal patients. Cornea 29:510–515CrossRef Kim EC, Kim MS (2010) A comparison of endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification in penetrating keratoplasty patients and normal patients. Cornea 29:510–515CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Patel SV, McLaren JW, Bachman LA, Bourne WM (2010) Comparison of flex-center, center, and corner methods of corneal endothelial cell analysis. Cornea 29:1042–1047CrossRef Patel SV, McLaren JW, Bachman LA, Bourne WM (2010) Comparison of flex-center, center, and corner methods of corneal endothelial cell analysis. Cornea 29:1042–1047CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dhasmana R, Singh IP, Nagpal RC (2014) Corneal changes in diabetic patients after manual small incision cataract surgery. J Clin Diagn Res 8:VC03–VC08PubMedPubMedCentral Dhasmana R, Singh IP, Nagpal RC (2014) Corneal changes in diabetic patients after manual small incision cataract surgery. J Clin Diagn Res 8:VC03–VC08PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Singh I, Kumar D, Singh S (2015) Specular microscopic changes in corneal endothelium after cataract surgery in different age group. J Med Sci Clin Res 3:3619–3628 Singh I, Kumar D, Singh S (2015) Specular microscopic changes in corneal endothelium after cataract surgery in different age group. J Med Sci Clin Res 3:3619–3628
18.
go back to reference Módis L, Langenbucher A, Seitz B (2002) Corneal endothelial cell density and pachymetry measured by contact and noncontact specular microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1763–1769CrossRef Módis L, Langenbucher A, Seitz B (2002) Corneal endothelial cell density and pachymetry measured by contact and noncontact specular microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1763–1769CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Doughty MJ (2013) Evaluation of possible error sources in corneal endothelial morphometry with a semi-automated non-contact specular microscope. Cornea 32:1196–1203CrossRef Doughty MJ (2013) Evaluation of possible error sources in corneal endothelial morphometry with a semi-automated non-contact specular microscope. Cornea 32:1196–1203CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Doughty MJ (2014) A prospective analysis of corneal endothelial polymegethism and cell density in young adult Asians. Clin Exp Optom 97:256–263CrossRef Doughty MJ (2014) A prospective analysis of corneal endothelial polymegethism and cell density in young adult Asians. Clin Exp Optom 97:256–263CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Deb-Joardar N, Thuret G, Zhao M, Acquart S, Péoc’h M, Garraud O, Gain P (2007) Comparison of two semiautomated methods for evaluating endothelial cells of eyebank corneas. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:3077–3082CrossRef Deb-Joardar N, Thuret G, Zhao M, Acquart S, Péoc’h M, Garraud O, Gain P (2007) Comparison of two semiautomated methods for evaluating endothelial cells of eyebank corneas. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:3077–3082CrossRef
Metadata
Title
On the regional variability of averaged cell area estimates for the human corneal endothelium in relation to the extent of polymegethism
Author
M. J. Doughty
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0765-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

International Ophthalmology 6/2018 Go to the issue