Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2007

01-09-2007 | Gynecologic Oncology

Omental Chemotherapy Effects as a Prognostic Factor in Ovarian Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Delayed Primary Surgical Debulking

Authors: Tien Le, FRCSC, Kona Williams, MSc, Mary Senterman, FRCPC, Laura Hopkins, FRCSC, Wylam Faught, FRCSC, M. Fung-Kee-Fung, FRCSC

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We sought to assess the prognostic significance of chemotherapy effect on upper abdominal metastatic disease.

Methods

Retrospective chart reviews were carried out from 1997 to 2005 to identify ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pathologic examinations of resected omental and ovarian tumors for the presence of chemotherapy effect were performed. Cox proportional hazard models were built to model time to progression and death by using predictor variables of age, tumor grade, amount and location of largest residual disease, and the presence of chemotherapy effects on resected tumors.

Results

Sixty-six patients with available slides and clinical information were identified. The presence of omental chemotherapy effects was observed in 58 patients (88%). Identified independent statistically significant predictors for progression-free survival included presence of omental chemotherapy effect (hazard ratio [HR], .38; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], .17–.89; P = .026) and suboptimal tumor residuals in upper abdominal location compared with pelvic location (HR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.06–5.48; P = .035). The presence of omental chemotherapy effect was the only statistically significant predictor of disease specific survival (HR, .21; 95% CI, .068–.639; P = .006). The estimated median survival for the group with positive omental chemotherapy effect was 84.45 months (95% CI, 69.63–99.28). The corresponding statistic in patients with no observed response to chemotherapy was 31.15 months (95% CI, 21.84–40.47).

Conclusions

Upper abdominal disease location and its response to chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival. Aggressive upper abdominal debulking procedures are recommended to improve oncologic outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Schwartz AG, Qureshi F, et al. Ovarian cancer: changes in patterns at diagnosis and relative survival over the last three decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1120–7PubMedCrossRef Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Schwartz AG, Qureshi F, et al. Ovarian cancer: changes in patterns at diagnosis and relative survival over the last three decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1120–7PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference McGuire V, Jesser CA, Whittemore AS. Survival among US women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002;84:399–403PubMedCrossRef McGuire V, Jesser CA, Whittemore AS. Survival among US women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002;84:399–403PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ferrandina G, Legge F, Salutari V, et al. Impact of pattern of recurrence on clinical outcome of ovarian cancer patients: clinical considerations. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:2296–302PubMedCrossRef Ferrandina G, Legge F, Salutari V, et al. Impact of pattern of recurrence on clinical outcome of ovarian cancer patients: clinical considerations. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:2296–302PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Podratz KC, Cliby WA. Surgical treatment of diaphragm disease correlates with improved survival in optimally debulked advanced stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100:283–7PubMedCrossRef Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Podratz KC, Cliby WA. Surgical treatment of diaphragm disease correlates with improved survival in optimally debulked advanced stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100:283–7PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chi DS, Franklin CC, Levine DA, et al. Improved optimal cytoreduction rates for stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: a change in surgical approach. Gynecol Oncol 2004;94:650–4PubMedCrossRef Chi DS, Franklin CC, Levine DA, et al. Improved optimal cytoreduction rates for stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: a change in surgical approach. Gynecol Oncol 2004;94:650–4PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM, Friedman RL, et al. Relative influences of tumor volume before surgery and the cytoreductive outcome on survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 2003;90:390–6PubMedCrossRef Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM, Friedman RL, et al. Relative influences of tumor volume before surgery and the cytoreductive outcome on survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 2003;90:390–6PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Giannopoulos T, Butler-Manuel S, Taylor A, et al. Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2006;27:25–8PubMed Giannopoulos T, Butler-Manuel S, Taylor A, et al. Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2006;27:25–8PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hegazy MA, Hegazi RA, Elshafei MA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 2005;31:57–9CrossRef Hegazy MA, Hegazi RA, Elshafei MA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 2005;31:57–9CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vergote I, De Wever I, Tjalma W, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 285 patients. Gynecol Oncol 1998;71:431–6PubMedCrossRef Vergote I, De Wever I, Tjalma W, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 285 patients. Gynecol Oncol 1998;71:431–6PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM. Procedures required to accomplish complete cytoreduction of ovarian cancer: is there a correlation with “biological aggressiveness” and survival? Gynecol Oncol 2001;82:435–41PubMedCrossRef Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM. Procedures required to accomplish complete cytoreduction of ovarian cancer: is there a correlation with “biological aggressiveness” and survival? Gynecol Oncol 2001;82:435–41PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sassen S, Schmalfeldt B, Avril N, et al. Histopathologic assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Hum Pathol 2007;38(6):926–34PubMedCrossRef Sassen S, Schmalfeldt B, Avril N, et al. Histopathologic assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Hum Pathol 2007;38(6):926–34PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Steed H, Oza AM, Murphy J, et al. A retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy versus up-front surgery in advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;16(Suppl 1):47–53PubMedCrossRef Steed H, Oza AM, Murphy J, et al. A retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy versus up-front surgery in advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;16(Suppl 1):47–53PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kapp KS, Kapp DS, Poschauko J, et al. The prognostic significance of peritoneal seeding and size of postsurgical residual in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and high-dose radiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 1999;74:400–7PubMedCrossRef Kapp KS, Kapp DS, Poschauko J, et al. The prognostic significance of peritoneal seeding and size of postsurgical residual in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and high-dose radiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 1999;74:400–7PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM. What are the current surgical objectives, strategies, and technical capabilities of gynecologic oncologists treating advanced epithelial ovarian cancer? Gyn Oncol 2001;82:489–97CrossRef Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM. What are the current surgical objectives, strategies, and technical capabilities of gynecologic oncologists treating advanced epithelial ovarian cancer? Gyn Oncol 2001;82:489–97CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Omental Chemotherapy Effects as a Prognostic Factor in Ovarian Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Delayed Primary Surgical Debulking
Authors
Tien Le, FRCSC
Kona Williams, MSc
Mary Senterman, FRCPC
Laura Hopkins, FRCSC
Wylam Faught, FRCSC
M. Fung-Kee-Fung, FRCSC
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2007
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9460-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2007

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2007 Go to the issue