Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2013

01-06-2013 | Original Article

Occupational therapy needs of patients with thoracic cancer at the time of diagnosis: findings of a dedicated rehabilitation service

Authors: Rachel Bentley, Asmah Hussain, Matthew Maddocks, Andrew Wilcock

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Guidelines recommend screening patients with cancer to identify their rehabilitation needs. To help quantify this area of need and associated workload from an occupational therapy perspective in patients with thoracic cancer, we report the experiences of a dedicated rehabilitation service.

Methods

Consecutive patients were screened soon after diagnosis using items associated with occupational performance in the Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care questionnaire. Those reporting predetermined levels of distress underwent a full occupational therapy evaluation; this generated a problem list from which individualised goals and interventions were instigated.

Results

Of 540 patients screened, 273 (51 %) reported levels of distress which warranted a full occupational therapy assessment. Of these, 260 (95 %) reported a total of 681 problems (median of 4 [2–5] per patient). Mostly these lay within the domain of self care (553, 78 %) in the categories of transfers, functional mobility and bathing/showering. A total of 646 goals (median of 2 [1–3] per patient) were formulated, resulting in 652 individual interventions, most frequently the provision of equipment (79 %) or advice (32 %) and referral to another professional/agency (23 %). Patients considered that most goals were achieved (98 %) and that the provision of equipment was useful (97 %).

Conclusions

About half of patients with thoracic cancer screened have occupational therapy needs around the time of diagnosis. Problems are mostly in the area of self-care, with equipment provision the most frequent intervention provided. Future work should examine the efficacy of occupational therapy interventions further.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2004) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer: the manual. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2004) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer: the manual. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London
2.
go back to reference National Cancer Action Team (2009) Cancer and palliative care rehabilitation workforce project: a review of the evidence. National Cancer Action Team, London National Cancer Action Team (2009) Cancer and palliative care rehabilitation workforce project: a review of the evidence. National Cancer Action Team, London
3.
go back to reference National Cancer Rehabilitation Advisory Board (2012) Cancer and palliative care rehabilitation: a review of the evidence update. National Cancer Action Team, London National Cancer Rehabilitation Advisory Board (2012) Cancer and palliative care rehabilitation: a review of the evidence update. National Cancer Action Team, London
4.
go back to reference National Cancer Action Team (2007) Holistic common assessment of supportive and palliative care needs for adults with cancer: assessment guidance. National Cancer Action Team, London National Cancer Action Team (2007) Holistic common assessment of supportive and palliative care needs for adults with cancer: assessment guidance. National Cancer Action Team, London
5.
go back to reference Ahmed N, Bestall JC, Payne SA, Noble B, Ahmedzai SH (2009) The use of cognitive interviewing methodology in the design and testing of a screening tool for supportive and palliative care needs. Support Care Canc 17:665–73CrossRef Ahmed N, Bestall JC, Payne SA, Noble B, Ahmedzai SH (2009) The use of cognitive interviewing methodology in the design and testing of a screening tool for supportive and palliative care needs. Support Care Canc 17:665–73CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wilcock A, Klezlova R, Coombes S, Rawson A, Bentley R, Hooper D, Maddocks M (2010) Identifying supportive and palliative care needs in people with a recent diagnosis of thoracic cancer: acceptability of the SPARC questionnaire. Thorax 65:937–938PubMedCrossRef Wilcock A, Klezlova R, Coombes S, Rawson A, Bentley R, Hooper D, Maddocks M (2010) Identifying supportive and palliative care needs in people with a recent diagnosis of thoracic cancer: acceptability of the SPARC questionnaire. Thorax 65:937–938PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference National Research Ethics Service (2010) Defining research: NRES guidance to help you decide if your project requires review by a research ethics committee. National Patient Safety Agency, London National Research Ethics Service (2010) Defining research: NRES guidance to help you decide if your project requires review by a research ethics committee. National Patient Safety Agency, London
8.
go back to reference Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655PubMedCrossRef Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N (2005) Canadian occupational performance measure, 4th edn. CAOT Publications, Ontario Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N (2005) Canadian occupational performance measure, 4th edn. CAOT Publications, Ontario
10.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) Clinical guideline 121. The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) Clinical guideline 121. The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London
11.
go back to reference Taylor K, Currow D (2003) A prospective study of patient identified unmet activity of daily living needs among cancer patients at a comprehensive cancer care centre. Aust Occup Ther J 50:79–85CrossRef Taylor K, Currow D (2003) A prospective study of patient identified unmet activity of daily living needs among cancer patients at a comprehensive cancer care centre. Aust Occup Ther J 50:79–85CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, Butow PN, Solomon MJ (2009) What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Canc 17:1117–1128CrossRef Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, Butow PN, Solomon MJ (2009) What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Canc 17:1117–1128CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kealey P, McIntyre L (2005) An evaluation of the domiciliary occupational therapy service in palliative care in a community trust: a patient and carers perspective. Eur J Canc Care 14:232–246CrossRef Kealey P, McIntyre L (2005) An evaluation of the domiciliary occupational therapy service in palliative care in a community trust: a patient and carers perspective. Eur J Canc Care 14:232–246CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lemoignan J, Chasen M, Bhargava R (2010) A retrospective study of the role of an occupational therapist in the cancer nutrition rehabilitation program. Support Care Canc 18:1589–1596CrossRef Lemoignan J, Chasen M, Bhargava R (2010) A retrospective study of the role of an occupational therapist in the cancer nutrition rehabilitation program. Support Care Canc 18:1589–1596CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Silver JK, Gilchrist LS (2011) Cancer rehabilitation with a focus on evidence-based outpatient physical and occupational therapy interventions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 90:S5–S15PubMedCrossRef Silver JK, Gilchrist LS (2011) Cancer rehabilitation with a focus on evidence-based outpatient physical and occupational therapy interventions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 90:S5–S15PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vargo MM (2008) The oncology-rehabilitation interface: better systems needed. J Clin Oncol 26:2610–2611PubMedCrossRef Vargo MM (2008) The oncology-rehabilitation interface: better systems needed. J Clin Oncol 26:2610–2611PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Occupational therapy needs of patients with thoracic cancer at the time of diagnosis: findings of a dedicated rehabilitation service
Authors
Rachel Bentley
Asmah Hussain
Matthew Maddocks
Andrew Wilcock
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1687-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine