Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 3/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

Obturator hernia: the relationship between anatomical classification and the Howship–Romberg sign

Authors: T. Karasaki, T. Nakagawa, N. Tanaka

Published in: Hernia | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The obturator hernia sac may follow the anterior or posterior branch of the obturator nerve, and thus, it can be classified anatomically. The relationship between the symptoms and the anatomical classification of obturator hernia has not yet been clearly described in the literature.

Methods

Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) examinations of 35 consecutive cases of new-onset obturator hernia admitted from March 2005 to April 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Obturator hernia was classified anatomically using MDCT. Patient characteristics and clinical presentations were compared among the anatomical classifications.

Results

Fifteen cases were classified as type I (anterior branch type) and 20 cases as type II (posterior branch type). There were no significant differences regarding time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis, presence of small bowel obstruction, and need for bowel resection. The Howship–Romberg sign was seen in 6 cases (30 %) of type II and 10 cases (67 %) of type I (p = 0.044).

Conclusions

The Howship–Romberg sign was present significantly more often with the anterior than the posterior branch type of obturator hernia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kammori M, Mafune K, Hirashima T et al (2004) Forty-three cases of obturator hernia. Am J Surg 187:549–552PubMedCrossRef Kammori M, Mafune K, Hirashima T et al (2004) Forty-three cases of obturator hernia. Am J Surg 187:549–552PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stamatiou D, Skandalakis LJ, Zoras O et al (2011) Obturator hernia revisited: surgical anatomy, embryology, diagnosis, and technique of repair. Am Surg 77:1147–1157 Stamatiou D, Skandalakis LJ, Zoras O et al (2011) Obturator hernia revisited: surgical anatomy, embryology, diagnosis, and technique of repair. Am Surg 77:1147–1157
3.
go back to reference Wakeley CPG (1939) Obturator hernia. Its aetiology, incidence, and treatment, with two personal operative cases. Br J Surg 26:515–525CrossRef Wakeley CPG (1939) Obturator hernia. Its aetiology, incidence, and treatment, with two personal operative cases. Br J Surg 26:515–525CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Picque L, Poirier P (1891) Etude sur la hernie obturatrice. Rev Chir 11:957–1005 (in French) Picque L, Poirier P (1891) Etude sur la hernie obturatrice. Rev Chir 11:957–1005 (in French)
5.
go back to reference Standring S (ed) (2008) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40th edn. Elsevier, Churchill-Livingstone, pp 1371–1383 Standring S (ed) (2008) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40th edn. Elsevier, Churchill-Livingstone, pp 1371–1383
6.
go back to reference Rogers FA (1960) Strangulated obturator hernia. Surgery 48:394–403PubMed Rogers FA (1960) Strangulated obturator hernia. Surgery 48:394–403PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gray SW, Skandalakis JE, Soria RE, Rowe JS Jr et al (1974) Strangulated obturator hernia. Surgery 75:20–27PubMed Gray SW, Skandalakis JE, Soria RE, Rowe JS Jr et al (1974) Strangulated obturator hernia. Surgery 75:20–27PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ziegler DW, Rhoads JE Jr (1995) Obturator hernia needs a laparotomy, not a diagnosis. Am J Surg 170:67–68PubMedCrossRef Ziegler DW, Rhoads JE Jr (1995) Obturator hernia needs a laparotomy, not a diagnosis. Am J Surg 170:67–68PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yip AW, AhChong AK, Lam KH (1993) Obturator hernia: a continuing diagnostic challenge. Surgery 113:266–269PubMed Yip AW, AhChong AK, Lam KH (1993) Obturator hernia: a continuing diagnostic challenge. Surgery 113:266–269PubMed
10.
go back to reference Ijiri R, Kanamaru H, Yokoyama H et al (1996) Obturator hernia: the usefulness of computed tomography in diagnosis. Surgery 119:137–140PubMedCrossRef Ijiri R, Kanamaru H, Yokoyama H et al (1996) Obturator hernia: the usefulness of computed tomography in diagnosis. Surgery 119:137–140PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shipkov CD, Uchikov AP, Grigoriadis E (2004) The obturator hernia: difficult to diagnose, easy to repair. Hernia 8:155–157PubMedCrossRef Shipkov CD, Uchikov AP, Grigoriadis E (2004) The obturator hernia: difficult to diagnose, easy to repair. Hernia 8:155–157PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nasir BS, Zendejas B, Ali SM et al (2012) Obturator hernia: the mayo clinic experience. Hernia 16:315–319PubMedCrossRef Nasir BS, Zendejas B, Ali SM et al (2012) Obturator hernia: the mayo clinic experience. Hernia 16:315–319PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lo CY, Lorentz TG, Lau PW (1994) Obturator hernia presenting as small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 167:396–398PubMedCrossRef Lo CY, Lorentz TG, Lau PW (1994) Obturator hernia presenting as small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 167:396–398PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hannington-Kiff JG (1980) Absent thigh adductor reflex in obturator hernia. Lancet 8161:180 Hannington-Kiff JG (1980) Absent thigh adductor reflex in obturator hernia. Lancet 8161:180
Metadata
Title
Obturator hernia: the relationship between anatomical classification and the Howship–Romberg sign
Authors
T. Karasaki
T. Nakagawa
N. Tanaka
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1068-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Hernia 3/2014 Go to the issue