Top

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Published in:

01-12-2009 | Basic Research

Objective Guidelines for Removing an External Fixator after Tibial Lengthening Using Pixel Value Ratio: A Pilot Study

Authors: Li Zhao, MD, PhD, Qing Fan, MD, K. P. Venkatesh, MS, Man S. Park, Hae Ryong Song, MD, PhD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 12/2009

Abstract

During limb lengthening over an intramedullary nail, decisions regarding external fixator removal and weightbearing depend on the amount of callus seen at the lengthening area on radiographs. However, this method is subjective and objective evaluation of the amount of callus likely would minimize nail or interlocking screw breakage and refracture after fixator removal. We asked how many cortices with full corticalization of the newly formed bone at the lengthening area are needed to allow fixator removal and full weightbearing and how to radiographically determine the stage of corticalization. We retrospectively reviewed 17 patients (34 lengthenings) who underwent bilateral tibial lengthenings over an intramedullary nail. The average gain in length was 7.2 ± 3.4 cm. We determined the pixel value ratio (ratio of pixel value of regenerate versus the mean pixel value of adjacent bone) of the lengthened area on radiographs. There were no nail or screw breakage and refracture. Partial weightbearing with crutches was permitted when the pixel value ratio was 1 in two cortices and full weightbearing without crutches was permitted when the pixel value ratio was 1 in three cortices. The pixel value ratio on radiographs can be an objective parameter for callus measurement and may provide guidelines for the timing of external fixator removal. We cannot determine from our limited data the minimum pixel value in how many cortices would suggest safe removal, but we can say our criteria were not associated with subsequent refracture.

Aquerreta JD, Forriol F, Canadell J. Complications of bone lengthening. Int Orthop. 1994;18:299–303.CrossRefPubMed

Catagni M. Imaging techniques: the radiographic classification of bone regenerate during distraction. In: Maiocchi AB, Aronson J, eds. Operative Principles of Ilizarov. London, UK: Williams & Wilkins; 1991;5:53–57.

Chakkalakal DA, Lippiello L, Wilson RF, Shindell R, Connolly JF. Mineral and matrix contributions to rigidity in fracture healing. J Biomech. 1990;23:425–434.CrossRefPubMed

De Backer AI, Mortele KJ, De Keulenaer BL. Picture archiving and communication system: Part one: filmless radiology and distance radiology. JBR-BTR. 2004;87:234–241.PubMed

De Bastiani G, Aldegheri R, Renzi-Brivio L, Trivella G. Limb lengthening by callus distraction (callotasis). J Pediatr Orthop. 1987;7:129–134.PubMed

Donnan LT, Saleh M, Rigby AS, McAndrew A. Radiographic assessment of bone formation in tibia during distraction histiogenesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22:645–651.CrossRefPubMed

Eyres KS, Bell MJ, Kanis JA. New bone formation during leg lengthening: evaluated by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:96–106.PubMed

Eyres KS, Bell MJ, Kanis JA. Methods of assessing new bone formation during limb lengthening: ultrasonography, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and radiography compared. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:358–364.PubMed

Fischgrund J, Paley D, Suter C. Variables affecting time to bone healing during limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:31–37.PubMed

10.

Hazra S, Song HR, Biswal S, Lee SH, Lee SH, Jang KM, Modi HN. Quantitative assessment of mineralization in distraction osteogenesis. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:843–847.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kocaoglu M, Eralp L, Kilicoglu O, Burc H, Cakmak M. Complications encountered during lengthening over an intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2406–2411.PubMed

12.

Kojimoto H, Yasui N, Goto T, Matsuda S, Shimomura Y. Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction: the role of periosteum and endosteum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:543–549.PubMed

13.

Kristiansen LP, Steen H. Lengthening of the tibia over an intramedullary nail, using the Ilizarov external fixator: major complications and slow consolidation in 9 lengthenings. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70:271–274.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Lauterburg MT, Exner GU, Jacob HA. Forces involved in lower limb lengthening: an in vivo biomechanical study. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:1815–1822.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Li R, Saleh M, Yang L, Coulton L. Radiographic classification of osteogenesis during bone distraction. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:339–347.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Maffulli N, Cheng JC, Sher A, Ng BK, Ng E. Bone mineralization at the callotasis site after completion of lengthening. Bone. 1999;25:333–338.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Minematsu K, Tsuchiya H, Taki J, Tomita K. Blood flow measurement during distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;347:229–235.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Paley D. Current techniques of limb lengthening. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988;8:73–92.PubMed

19.

Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:81–104.PubMed

20.

Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Paremain G, Bhave A. Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail: a matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1464–1480.PubMed

21.

Park HW, Yang KH, Lee KS, Joo SY, Kwak YH, Kim HW. Tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail with use of the Ilizarov external fixator for idiopathic short stature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1970–1978.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Powell ES, Lawford PV, Duckworth T, Black MM. Is callus calcium content an indicator of the mechanical strength of healing fractures? An experimental study in rat metatarsals. J Biomed Eng. 1989;11:277–281.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Romanowski CA, Underwood AC, Sprigg A. Reduction of radiation doses in leg lengthening procedures by means of audit and computed tomography scanogram techniques. Br J Radiol. 1994;67:1103–1107.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Salmas MG, Nikiforidis G, Sakellaropoulos G, Kosti P, Lambiris E. Estimation of artifacts induced by the Ilizarov device in quantitative computed tomographic analysis of tibiae. Injury. 1998;29:711–716.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Shim JS, Chung KH, Ahn JM. Value of measuring bone density serial changes on a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) monitor in distraction osteogenesis. Orthopedics. 2002;25:1269–1272.PubMed

26.

Song HR, Oh CW, Mattoo R, Park BC, Kim SJ, Park IH, Jeon IH, Ihn CH. Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail using the external fixator: risk of infection and knee problems in 22 patients with a follow-up of 2 years or more. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:245–252.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Tselentakis G, Owen PJ, Richardson JB, Kuiper JH, Haddaway MJ, Dwyer JS, Evans GA. Fracture stiffness in callotasis determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001;10:248–254.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Vade A, Eissenstat R. Radiographic features of bone lengthening procedures. Radiology. 1990;174:531–537.PubMed

29.

Young JW, Kovelman H, Resnik CS, Paley D. Radiologic assessment of bones after Ilizarov procedures. Radiology. 1990;177:89–93.PubMed

Title: Objective Guidelines for Removing an External Fixator after Tibial Lengthening Using Pixel Value Ratio: A Pilot Study
Authors: Li Zhao, MD, PhD
Qing Fan, MD
K. P. Venkatesh, MS
Man S. Park
Hae Ryong Song, MD, PhD
Publication date: 01-12-2009
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 12/2009
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1011-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Objective Guidelines for Removing an External Fixator after Tibial Lengthening Using Pixel Value Ratio: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 12/2009

The Use of Confidence Intervals in Reporting Orthopaedic Research Findings

Cancellous Bone Properties and Matrix Content of TGF-β2 and IGF-I in Human Tibia: A Pilot Study

Stimulation of Ectopic Bone Formation in Response to BMP-2 by Rho Kinase Inhibitor: A Pilot Study

Femoral Head Size and Wear of Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene at 5 to 8 Years

The Classic: Bone Morphogenetic Protein

50 Years Ago in CORR: The Parathyroid Hormone and Bone Franklin C. McLean, MD CORR 1957;9:46–60