Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 10/2020

01-10-2020 | Obesity | Original Contributions

The Clinical Value and Appropriateness Criteria of Upper Abdominal Magnetic Resonance Examinations in Patients Before and After Bariatric Surgery: a Study of 837 Images

Authors: Han Lv, Mengyi Li, Yang Liu, Lei Zhao, Jing Sun, Di Cao, Na Zeng, Jia Liu, Yawen Liu, Shibo Bian, Peng Zhang, Zhenghan Yang, Zhongtao Zhang, Zhenchang Wang

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) examinations have been increasingly applied in patients with obesity. However, few studies analyzed the appropriateness of this examination. This study is aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical value of upper abdominal MR in quantification of visceral/subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT/SAT) and liver fat fraction (LFF) in patients before and after bariatric surgery.

Methods

All patients who underwent bariatric surgery from November 2017 to November 2019 in the prospectively maintained, IRB-approved database of our institution were queried. The images of all MR studies were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

Results

In total, 570 patients with 837 upper abdominal MR examinations were analyzed. The VAT/SAT can be clearly visualized and quantified on fat liver acquisition with volume acceleration-flexible (LAVA-Flex) sequence. The present rate of a single axial slice at the level of the L1–L2 intervertebral disc was 93.1% (779/837). The LFF could be quantitatively evaluated on all of the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps (100%, 837/837). Occasional findings may include cholelithiasis, cysts, hepatic hemangioma, and renal angiomyolipoma, which can be clearly diagnosed by MR.

Conclusion

The upper abdominal MR is featured by well feasibility and clear clinical value when applying in patients with obesity. We can use the results to do clinical research and evaluate obesity-related disease risks before and after surgery, thus providing suggestions to choose the type of surgery for patients with different risk levels in the future. MR scanning including fat LAVA-Flex images with the inclusion of L1–L2 level and PDFF measurements is suggested for the VAT/SAT/LFF quantification.

Trial Registration

Literature
1.
go back to reference NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377–96.CrossRef NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377–96.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bower G, Toma T, Harling L, et al. Bariatric surgery and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review of liver biochemistry and histology. Obes Surg. 2015;25(12):2280–9.PubMedCrossRef Bower G, Toma T, Harling L, et al. Bariatric surgery and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review of liver biochemistry and histology. Obes Surg. 2015;25(12):2280–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bastien M, Poirier P, Lemieux I, et al. Overview of epidemiology and contribution of obesity to cardiovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56(4):369–81.PubMedCrossRef Bastien M, Poirier P, Lemieux I, et al. Overview of epidemiology and contribution of obesity to cardiovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56(4):369–81.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wang Y, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, et al. Comparison of abdominal adiposity and overall obesity in predicting risk of type 2 diabetes among men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(3):555–63.PubMedCrossRef Wang Y, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, et al. Comparison of abdominal adiposity and overall obesity in predicting risk of type 2 diabetes among men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(3):555–63.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cheng X, Zhang Y, Wang C, et al. The optimal anatomic site for a single slice to estimate the total volume of visceral adipose tissue by using the quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in Chinese population. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72(11):1567–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cheng X, Zhang Y, Wang C, et al. The optimal anatomic site for a single slice to estimate the total volume of visceral adipose tissue by using the quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in Chinese population. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72(11):1567–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brown RE, Kuk JL, Lee S. Measurement site influences abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in obese adolescents before and after exercise. Pediatr Obes. 2015;10(2):98–104.PubMedCrossRef Brown RE, Kuk JL, Lee S. Measurement site influences abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in obese adolescents before and after exercise. Pediatr Obes. 2015;10(2):98–104.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Idilman IS, Aniktar H, Idilman R, et al. Hepatic steatosis: quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy. Radiology. 2013;267(3):767–75.PubMedCrossRef Idilman IS, Aniktar H, Idilman R, et al. Hepatic steatosis: quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy. Radiology. 2013;267(3):767–75.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tang A, Tan J, Sun M, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. Radiology. 2013;267(2):422–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tang A, Tan J, Sun M, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. Radiology. 2013;267(2):422–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schweitzer L, Geisler C, Pourhassan M, et al. What is the best reference site for a single MRI slice to assess whole-body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes in healthy adults? Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(1):58–65.PubMedCrossRef Schweitzer L, Geisler C, Pourhassan M, et al. What is the best reference site for a single MRI slice to assess whole-body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes in healthy adults? Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(1):58–65.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Li M. Alterations of liver fat fraction features examined by magnetic resonance imaging following bariatric surgery: a self-controlled observational study. Obes Surg. 2020:in press. Li M. Alterations of liver fat fraction features examined by magnetic resonance imaging following bariatric surgery: a self-controlled observational study. Obes Surg. 2020:in press.
11.
go back to reference Bosy-Westphal A, Kossel E, Goele K, et al. Contribution of individual organ mass loss to weight loss-associated decline in resting energy expenditure. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(4):993–1001.PubMedCrossRef Bosy-Westphal A, Kossel E, Goele K, et al. Contribution of individual organ mass loss to weight loss-associated decline in resting energy expenditure. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(4):993–1001.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gero D, Raptis DA, Vleeschouwers W, et al. Defining global benchmarks in bariatric surgery: a retrospective multicenter analysis of minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;270(5):859–67.PubMedCrossRef Gero D, Raptis DA, Vleeschouwers W, et al. Defining global benchmarks in bariatric surgery: a retrospective multicenter analysis of minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;270(5):859–67.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hui S et al. Observed changes in brown, white, hepatic and pancreatic fat after bariatric surgery: evaluation with MRI. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(2):849–56.PubMedCrossRef Hui S et al. Observed changes in brown, white, hepatic and pancreatic fat after bariatric surgery: evaluation with MRI. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(2):849–56.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ji Y, Yiorkas AM, Frau F, et al. Genome-wide and abdominal MRI data provide evidence that a genetically determined favorable adiposity phenotype is characterized by lower ectopic liver fat and lower risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and hypertension. Diabetes. 2019;68(1):207–19.PubMedCrossRef Ji Y, Yiorkas AM, Frau F, et al. Genome-wide and abdominal MRI data provide evidence that a genetically determined favorable adiposity phenotype is characterized by lower ectopic liver fat and lower risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and hypertension. Diabetes. 2019;68(1):207–19.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Marinou K, Hodson L, Vasan SK, et al. Structural and functional properties of deep abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue explain its association with insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk in men. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):821–9.PubMedCrossRef Marinou K, Hodson L, Vasan SK, et al. Structural and functional properties of deep abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue explain its association with insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk in men. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):821–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hausman GJ. The origin and purpose of layers of subcutaneous adipose tissue in pigs and man. Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest. 2018;33(1) Hausman GJ. The origin and purpose of layers of subcutaneous adipose tissue in pigs and man. Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest. 2018;33(1)
17.
go back to reference Gao Y, Wang YC, Lu CQ, et al. Correlations between the abdominal fat-related parameters and severity of coronary artery disease assessed by computed tomography. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018;8(6):579–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gao Y, Wang YC, Lu CQ, et al. Correlations between the abdominal fat-related parameters and severity of coronary artery disease assessed by computed tomography. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018;8(6):579–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yan Y, Liu J, Zhao X, et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues in association with cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents: the China Child and Adolescent Cardiovascular Health (CCACH) study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019;7(1):e000824.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yan Y, Liu J, Zhao X, et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues in association with cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents: the China Child and Adolescent Cardiovascular Health (CCACH) study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019;7(1):e000824.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines. Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol. 2015;63(1):237–64.CrossRef EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines. Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol. 2015;63(1):237–64.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Loomba R. Role of imaging-based biomarkers in NAFLD: recent advances in clinical application and future research directions. J Hepatol. 2018;68(2):296–304.PubMedCrossRef Loomba R. Role of imaging-based biomarkers in NAFLD: recent advances in clinical application and future research directions. J Hepatol. 2018;68(2):296–304.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Abou HB et al. Role of routine abdominal ultrasound before bariatric surgery: review of 937 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2696–9.CrossRef Abou HB et al. Role of routine abdominal ultrasound before bariatric surgery: review of 937 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2696–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mizrahi I, Abubeih A’, Rachmuth J, et al. Routine upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: is it necessary? Obes Surg. 2019;29(6):1704–8.PubMedCrossRef Mizrahi I, Abubeih A’, Rachmuth J, et al. Routine upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: is it necessary? Obes Surg. 2019;29(6):1704–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Clinical Value and Appropriateness Criteria of Upper Abdominal Magnetic Resonance Examinations in Patients Before and After Bariatric Surgery: a Study of 837 Images
Authors
Han Lv
Mengyi Li
Yang Liu
Lei Zhao
Jing Sun
Di Cao
Na Zeng
Jia Liu
Yawen Liu
Shibo Bian
Peng Zhang
Zhenghan Yang
Zhongtao Zhang
Zhenchang Wang
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04688-w

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Obesity Surgery 10/2020 Go to the issue