Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 12/2019

01-12-2019 | Obesity | Original Contributions

Perceived Barriers in the Decision for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Results from a Representative Study in Germany

Authors: C. Luck-Sikorski, F. Jung, A. Dietrich, C. Stroh, S. G. Riedel-Heller

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Attitudes of the general public may be an influencing factor for low surgery rates: When skepticism is high, support for individuals wanting or needing to undergo surgery may diminish. This study assesses the relevance of barriers to metabolic surgery.

Methods

The study was conducted using a representative sample of the German population (n = 1007). Participants were asked to imagine that they would have to decide for or against metabolic surgery and rate how this decision would be influenced by a number of reasons given to them (Likert scale). Results are presented by weight status.

Results

The barrier found most irrelevant is that surgery could be considered cheating across all weight groups. About a fourth of the sample state that not knowing enough about surgery (28.5%), being afraid of surgery (28.3%), and potential negative consequences after surgery (24.5%) are reasons against metabolic surgery that were rated extremely relevant. Having obesity was a significant predictor of endorsement in two variables: feeling like cheating (lower probability for relevance, OR = 0.58, p = 0.025) and a lack of knowledge (lower probability for relevance, OR = 0.59, p = 0.031).

Conclusions

In summary, the public’s view of weight loss surgery lacks information about post-surgical consequences. It is important to address these points in the public and in social networks of patients as they may be pre- or antecedent of surgery stigma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mensink GBM, Schienkiewitz A, Scheidt-Nave C. Overweight and obesity in Germany. Results of the German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz [Internet]. 2013;56:786–94.CrossRef Mensink GBM, Schienkiewitz A, Scheidt-Nave C. Overweight and obesity in Germany. Results of the German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz [Internet]. 2013;56:786–94.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lenzen-Schulte M. Therapie der Fettleibigkeit: Nur Hürden statt Hilfe für Adipöse; [Treatment for obesity: barriers instead of help]. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(11):A–484. Lenzen-Schulte M. Therapie der Fettleibigkeit: Nur Hürden statt Hilfe für Adipöse; [Treatment for obesity: barriers instead of help]. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(11):A–484.
12.
go back to reference Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, Parikh JA, Dutson E, Mehran A, et al. Is social support associated with greater weight loss after bariatric surgery?: a systematic review. England; 2011. Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, Parikh JA, Dutson E, Mehran A, et al. Is social support associated with greater weight loss after bariatric surgery?: a systematic review. England; 2011.
15.
go back to reference Behr D, Harkness JA, Fitzgerald R, et al. Round 4 ESS translation strategies and procedures. London: European Social Survey, Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University; 2008. Behr D, Harkness JA, Fitzgerald R, et al. Round 4 ESS translation strategies and procedures. London: European Social Survey, Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University; 2008.
16.
go back to reference StataCorp LP. Stata statistical software: release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2015. StataCorp LP. Stata statistical software: release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2015.
Metadata
Title
Perceived Barriers in the Decision for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Results from a Representative Study in Germany
Authors
C. Luck-Sikorski
F. Jung
A. Dietrich
C. Stroh
S. G. Riedel-Heller
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04082-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

Obesity Surgery 12/2019 Go to the issue