Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Obesity | Research article

Initiatives and partnerships in an Australian metropolitan obesity prevention system: a social network analysis

Authors: Krysten Blackford, Justine E. Leavy, Abbie-Clare Vidler, Dan Chamberlain, Christina Pollard, Therese Riley, Megan Milligan, Jonine Jancey

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Limited resources make prevention of complex population-level issues such as obesity increasingly challenging. Collaboration and partnerships between organisations operating in the same system can assist, however, there is a paucity of research into how relationships function at a local level. The aim of this study was to audit initiatives, explore networks, and identify potential opportunities for improving the obesity prevention system in a Health Service area of Western Australia (WA).

Methods

A mixed-methods study was undertaken in a metropolitan Health Service in Perth, WA in 2019–20. Structured face-to-face interviews (n = 51) were conducted with organisations engaged in obesity prevention, to identify prevention initiatives and their characteristics using a Systems Inventory tool. The Research Team identified the 30 most active organisations during the Systems Inventory, and an online Organisational Network Survey was administered to explore: relationships across six domains; partnership duration; frequency of interaction with other organisations; barriers to implementation; and key contributions to obesity prevention. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise barriers, contributions and Systems Inventory data. Organisational Network Survey data were analysed using social network analysis through UCINET 6 for Windows and Netdraw software. Whole network and cohesion scores were calculated: average degree; density; diameter; and degree centralization. Core-periphery analysis was conducted to identify densely connected core and sparsely connected periphery organisations.

Results

The Systems Inventory identified 189 unique prevention initiatives, mostly focusing on individual-level behaviour change. Fifty four percent (n = 15) of the Organisational Network Survey respondent organisations and most core organisations (67%, n = 8) were government. The information and knowledge sharing network had a density of 45% indicating a high level of information and knowledge exchange between organisations. The lowest densities were found within the receiving (3.3%), providing (5.5%) and sharing (5.6%) funding networks, suggesting that these formal relationships were the least established.

Conclusion

Applying a systems thinking lens to local obesity prevention revealed that initiatives conducted focused on individual-level behaviour change and that collaboration and communication between organisations focused on information sharing. Capturing the extent and nature of initiatives and the way partnerships operate to improve obesity prevention can help to identify opportunities to strengthen the networks.

Available only for authorised users

World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020. Geneva: Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's Health 2018. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2018.

World Health Organization: Obesity and overweight. In.; 2018.

Di Angelantonio E, Bhupathiraju SN, Wormser D, Gao P, Kaptoge S, de Gonzalez AB, et al. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet. 2016;388(10046):776–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30175-1.CrossRefPubMed

Australian Bureau of Statistics: National Health Survey: First Results, 2017–18 In. Edited by Australian Bureau of Statistics. Canberra; 2018.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian burden of disease study: Impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2015. AIHW. 2016;2019:59.

PwC Australia: Weighing the cost of obesity: A case for action. In.; 2015.

Bevc CA, Retrum JH, Varda DM. New perspectives on the “Silo effect”: initial comparisons of network structures across public health collaboratives. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(S2):S230–5. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Reicks M, Trofholz AC, Stang JS, Laska MN. Impact of cooking and home food preparation interventions among adults: outcomes and implications for future programs. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(4):259–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.02.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Butcher LM, Rose Chester M, Michelle Aberle L, Jo-Ann Bobongie V, Davies C, Louise Godrich S, et al. Foodbank of Western Australia's healthy food for all. Br Food J. 2014;116(9):1490–505. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2014-0041.CrossRef

11.

Nader PR, Huang TT-K, Gahagan S, Kumanyika S, Hammond RA, Christoffel KK. Next steps in obesity prevention: altering early life systems to support healthy parents, infants, and toddlers. Child Obes. 2012;8(3):195–204. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2012.0004.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Silvia C. Evaluating collaboration: the solution to one problem often causes another. Public Adm Rev. 2018;78(3):472–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12888.CrossRef

13.

Kania J, Kramer M. Collective impact. In: Stanford social innovation review. Vol. winter 2011. Palo Alto: Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society, Stanford University; 2011.

14.

Whelan J, Love P, Romanus A, Pettman T, Bolton K, Smith E, et al. A map of community-based obesity prevention initiatives in Australia following obesity funding 2009-2013. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015;39(2):168–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12296.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Valente TW. Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications. 2010.

16.

Leischow SJ, Best A, Trochim WM, Clark PI, Gallagher RS, Marcus SE, et al. Systems thinking to improve the public's health. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2 Suppl):S196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Lori Baugh L, Wilson A. Strengthening complex systems for chronic disease prevention: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19.

18.

Lich KH, Ginexi EM, Osgood ND, Mabry PL. A call to address complexity in prevention science research. Prev Sci. 2013;14(3):279–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0285-2.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Carey G, Malbon E, Carey N, Joyce A, Crammond B, Carey A. Systems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review of the field. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Luke DA, Stamatakis KA. Systems science methods in public health: dynamics, networks, and agents. Annu Rev Public Health. 2012;33(1):357–76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101222.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Mabry PL, Marcus SE, Clark PI, Leischow SJ, Méndez D. Systems science: a revolution in public health policy research. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(7):1161–3. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.198176.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Adam T. Advancing the application of systems thinking in health. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Borgatti S, Everett M, Johnson J. Analyzing social networks. 2nd ed. London, UK: Sage Publications; 2018.

24.

Noga J. A systems thinking glossary. 2016.

25.

Kothari A, Hamel N, MacDonald J, Meyer M, Cohen B, Bonnenfant D. Exploring community collaborations: social network analysis as a reflective tool for public health. Syst Pract Action Res. 2014;27(2):123–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9271-7.CrossRef

26.

Hawe P, Webster C, Shiell A. A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(12):971–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.014530.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Kreisel W, von Schirnding Y. Intersectoral action for health: a cornerstone for health for all in the 21st century. World Health Stat Q. 1998;51(1):75–8.PubMed

28.

World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. In.; 1986.

29.

Hopkins L, Chamberlain D, Held F, Riley T, Wang JZJ, Conte K. Collaborative networks in chronic disease prevention: what factors inhibit partnering for funding? Int J Public Adm. 2019.

30.

Green LW, Sim L, Breiner H. Systems and evaluation: placing a systems approach in context. In: evaluating obesity prevention efforts: a plan for measuring Progress. In: Green LW, Sim L, Breiner H, editors. Edited by committee on evaluating Progress of obesity prevention effort, food and nutrition board, Institute of Medicine. Washington (USA): National Academic Press; 2013.

31.

Conte KP, Ryder TJ, Hopkins L, Gomez M, Riley T. Committed, ambivalent, concealed, or distanced: community organisations’ perceptions of their role in local prevention systems. Crit Public Health. 2020:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2020.1795083.

32.

Riley T, Hopkins L, Gomez M, Davidson S, Chamberlain D, Jacob J, et al. A systems thinking methodology for studying prevention efforts in communities. Syst Pract Action Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-020-09544-7.

33.

Jancey J, Leavy JE, Pollard C, Riley T, Szybiak M, Milligan M, et al. Exploring network structure and the role of key stakeholders to understand the obesity prevention system in an Australian metropolitan health service: study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e027948. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027948.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Lee-Han H, Dwyer J, Johnson I. Application of nominal group technique to evaluate a community health status report. Can J Program Eval. 1996;11(1).

35.

Biernacki P, Waldorf D. Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Methods Res. 1981;10(2):141–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205.CrossRef

36.

The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre: System Inventory. In.: Sax Institute; 2018.

37.

Program to Analyze, Record, and Track Networks to Enhance Relationships [http://www.partnertool.net].

38.

Milward HB, Provan KG. Measuring network structure. Public Adm. 1998;76(2):387–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00106.CrossRef

39.

The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre: A community snapshot. In.: Sax Institute; 2018.

40.

Taherdoost H. Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. Int J Acad Res Manage. 2016;5(3):28–36.

41.

Registration: Codes and guidelines [https://www.ahpra.gov.au/Registration/Registration-Standards/codes-guidelines.aspx].

42.

The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre: Social network analysis. In.: Sax Institute; 2018.

43.

Borgatti S, Carley K, Krackhardt D. On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Soc Networks. 2006;28(2):124–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.05.001.CrossRef

44.

Qualtrics: Qualtrics. In. Provo, Utah, USA; 2018.

45.

Corp. I: IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. In. Arnmork: IMB Corp. ; 2017.

46.

Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L. Ucinet for windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies; 2002.

47.

Borgatti S. NetDraw: graph visualization software. In: Harv Analytic Technologies; 2002.

48.

Dickison ME, Magnani M, Rossi L. Multilayer social networks. New York: NY: Cambridge University Press; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139941907.CrossRef

49.

Home Office. Social Network Analysis: 'How to guide'. In.; 2016.

50.

Freeman L. Centrality in social networks: a conceptual clarification. Soc Netw. 1979;1:215–39.CrossRef

51.

Hanneman R, Riddle M. Introduction to social network methods. In California: USA. 2005.

52.

Rombach M, Porter M, Fowler J, Mucha P. Core-periphery structure in a network. SIAM J Appl Math. 2013;74(1):167–90.CrossRef

53.

Dalle Grave R, Centis E, Marzocchi R, El Ghoch M, Marchesini G. Major factors for facilitating change in behavioral strategies to reduce obesity. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2013;6:101–10. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S40460.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Swinburn B, Caterson I, Seidell JC, James WP. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of excess weight gain and obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7(1a):123–46. https://doi.org/10.1079/phn2003585.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Flego A, Herbert J, Waters E, Gibbs L, Swinburn B, Reynolds J, et al. Jamie's Ministry of Food: quasi-experimental evaluation of immediate and sustained impacts of a cooking skills program in Australia. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):18.CrossRef

56.

Gray J, Hoon EA, Hossein Haji Ali A, Spooner C, Harris MF, Karnon J. Is the counterweight program a feasible and acceptable option for structured weight management delivered by practice nurses in Australia? A mixed-methods study. Aust J Prim Health. 2017;23(4):348–63. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY16105.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Khanal S, Lloyd B, Rissel C, Portors C, Grunseit A, Indig D, et al. Evaluation of the implementation of get healthy at work, a workplace health promotion program in New South Wales, Australia. Health Promot J Aust. 2016;27(3):243–50. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE16039.CrossRef

58.

Anaf J, Baum F, Freeman T, Labonte R, Javanparast S, Jolley G, et al. Factors shaping intersectoral action in primary health care services. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014;38(6):553–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12284.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Corbin JH, Jones J, Barry MM. What makes intersectoral partnerships for health promotion work? A review of the international literature. Health Promot Int. 2016;33(1):4–26.PubMedCentral

60.

Held F, Hawe P, Roberts N, Conte K, Riley T. Core and peripheral organisations in prevention: Insights from social network analysis. Health Promot J Aust. 2020;32:492–502.

61.

Isett KR, Mergel IA, LeRoux K, Mischen PA, Rethemeyer RK. Networks in public administration scholarship: understanding where we are and where we need to go. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2011;21(suppl_1):i157–73.CrossRef

62.

Doerfel ML, Atouba Y, Harris JL. (Un) obtrusive control in emergent networks: examining funding agencies’ control over nonprofit networks. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2017;46(3):469–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016664588.CrossRef

63.

Aicken C, Roberts H, Arai L. Mapping service activity: the example of childhood obesity schemes in England. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):310. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-310.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Roussy V, Riley T, Livingstone C. Together stronger: boundary work within an Australian systems-based prevention initiative. Health Promot Int. 2019.

65.

Wutzke S, Morrice E, Benton M, Wilson A. Systems approaches for chronic disease prevention: sound logic and empirical evidence, but is this view shared outside of academia? Public Health Res Pract. 2016;26(3):2631632. https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp2631632.

Title: Initiatives and partnerships in an Australian metropolitan obesity prevention system: a social network analysis
Authors: Krysten Blackford
Justine E. Leavy
Abbie-Clare Vidler
Dan Chamberlain
Christina Pollard
Therese Riley
Megan Milligan
Jonine Jancey
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keywords: Obesity
Obesity
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11599-7

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Initiatives and partnerships in an Australian metropolitan obesity prevention system: a social network analysis

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Lifestyle habits of adults during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Cyprus: evidence from a cross-sectional study

Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review

Sex differences in the associations between adiposity distribution and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight or obese individuals: a cross-sectional study

Physical fighting among adolescents in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

Recognizing the hidden: strengthening the HIV surveillance system among key and priority populations in Mozambique

Acceptability and feasibility of the school-engaged social and behavior change communication approach on malaria prevention in Ethiopia: implications for engagement, empowerment, and retention (EER) of education sectors in malaria elimination efforts