Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 3/2021

Open Access 01-06-2021 | Obesity | Original Article

Impact of body mass index on the early experience of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Authors: Ying-Jui Chao, Ting-Kai Liao, Ping-Jui Su, Chih-Jung Wang, Yan-Shen Shan

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Obesity increases surgical morbidity and mortality in open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Its influence on robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the early experience of RPD. Between June 2015 and April 2020, 68 consecutive RPDs were performed at the National Cheng Kung University Hospital. The patients were categorized as normal-weight (BMI < 23 kg/m2), overweight (BMI = 23–27.5 kg/m2), and obese (BMI > 27.5 kg/m2) according to the definition of obesity in Asian people from the World Health Organization expert consultation. Preoperative characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were prospectively collected. The cumulative sum was used to assess the learning curves. The average age of the patients was 64.8 ± 11.7 years with an average BMI of 24.6 ± 3.7 kg/m2 (23 normal-weight, 29 overweight, and 16 obese patients). Eighteen patients were required to overcome the learning curve. The overall complication rate was 51.5%, and the major complication rate (Clavien grade ≥ III) was 19.1%. The normal-weight group showed the most favorable outcomes. The blood loss, major complication rate, peripancreatic fluid collection rate, and conversion rate were higher in the obese group than in the non-obese group. There were no differences in the operative time, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, bile leak, wound infection, reoperation, hospital stay, and readmission rate between the obese and non-obese groups. Multivariate analysis showed obesity as the only independent factor for major complications (OR: 5.983, CI: 1.394–25.682, p = 0.001), indicating that obesity should be considered as a surgical risk factor during the implementation of RPD.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chang HC, Yang HC, Chang HY et al (2017) Morbid obesity in Taiwan: prevalence, trends, associated social demographics, and lifestyle factors. PLoS One 12:e0169577CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chang HC, Yang HC, Chang HY et al (2017) Morbid obesity in Taiwan: prevalence, trends, associated social demographics, and lifestyle factors. PLoS One 12:e0169577CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Hotouras A, Ribas Y, Zakeri SA et al (2016) The influence of obesity and body mass index on the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic literature review. Colorectal Dis 18:O337–O366CrossRefPubMed Hotouras A, Ribas Y, Zakeri SA et al (2016) The influence of obesity and body mass index on the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic literature review. Colorectal Dis 18:O337–O366CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Paajanen H, Kakela P, Suuronen S et al (2012) Impact of obesity and associated diseases on outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:509–513CrossRefPubMed Paajanen H, Kakela P, Suuronen S et al (2012) Impact of obesity and associated diseases on outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:509–513CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Yu X, Yu H, Fang X (2016) The impact of body mass index on short-term surgical outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy, a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol 16:29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yu X, Yu H, Fang X (2016) The impact of body mass index on short-term surgical outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy, a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol 16:29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Tielsch JM et al (1998) Statewide regionalization of pancreaticoduodenectomy and its effect on in-hospital mortality. Ann Surg 228:71–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Tielsch JM et al (1998) Statewide regionalization of pancreaticoduodenectomy and its effect on in-hospital mortality. Ann Surg 228:71–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Cameron JL, He J (2015) Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 220:530–536CrossRefPubMed Cameron JL, He J (2015) Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 220:530–536CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gleeson EM, Shaikh MF, Shewokis PA et al (2016) WHipple-ABACUS, a simple, validated risk score for 30-day mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy developed using the ACS-NSQIP database. Surgery 160:1279–1287CrossRefPubMed Gleeson EM, Shaikh MF, Shewokis PA et al (2016) WHipple-ABACUS, a simple, validated risk score for 30-day mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy developed using the ACS-NSQIP database. Surgery 160:1279–1287CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Noun R, Riachy E, Ghorra C et al (2008) The impact of obesity on surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP 9:468–476PubMed Noun R, Riachy E, Ghorra C et al (2008) The impact of obesity on surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP 9:468–476PubMed
11.
go back to reference Chang EH, Sugiyama G, Smith MC et al (2019) Obesity and surgical complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy: an observation study utilizing ACS NSQIP. Am J Surg 220(1):135–139CrossRefPubMed Chang EH, Sugiyama G, Smith MC et al (2019) Obesity and surgical complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy: an observation study utilizing ACS NSQIP. Am J Surg 220(1):135–139CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ekstrom E, Ansari D, Williamsson C et al (2017) Impact of body constitution on complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg (Lond Engl) 48:116–121CrossRef Ekstrom E, Ansari D, Williamsson C et al (2017) Impact of body constitution on complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg (Lond Engl) 48:116–121CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Del Chiaro M, Rangelova E, Ansorge C et al (2013) Impact of body mass index for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 4:37–42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Del Chiaro M, Rangelova E, Ansorge C et al (2013) Impact of body mass index for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 4:37–42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Kamarajah SK, Bundred JR, Marc OS et al (2020) A systematic review and network meta-analysis of different surgical approaches for pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 22:329–339CrossRefPubMed Kamarajah SK, Bundred JR, Marc OS et al (2020) A systematic review and network meta-analysis of different surgical approaches for pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 22:329–339CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nassour I, Wang SC, Christie A et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched study from a national cohort of patients. Ann Surg 268:151–157CrossRefPubMed Nassour I, Wang SC, Christie A et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched study from a national cohort of patients. Ann Surg 268:151–157CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zureikat AH, Postlewait LM, Liu Y et al (2016) A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 264:640–649CrossRefPubMed Zureikat AH, Postlewait LM, Liu Y et al (2016) A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 264:640–649CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL et al (2020) The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg 271:1–14CrossRefPubMed Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL et al (2020) The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg 271:1–14CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference WHO Expert Consultation (2004) Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet (Lond Engl) 363:157–163CrossRef WHO Expert Consultation (2004) Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet (Lond Engl) 363:157–163CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the international study group (isgps) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the international study group (isgps) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Wang CJ, Chao YJ, Sy ED et al (2019) A simple method of intracorporeal “W-shaped” liver retraction technique for minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 29:e24–e28CrossRefPubMed Wang CJ, Chao YJ, Sy ED et al (2019) A simple method of intracorporeal “W-shaped” liver retraction technique for minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 29:e24–e28CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI et al (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860CrossRefPubMed Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI et al (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Girgis MD, Zenati MS, Steve J et al (2017) Robotic approach mitigates perioperative morbidity in obese patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 19:93–98CrossRefPubMed Girgis MD, Zenati MS, Steve J et al (2017) Robotic approach mitigates perioperative morbidity in obese patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 19:93–98CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kepley AL, Nishiyama KK, Zhou B et al (2017) Differences in bone quality and strength between Asian and Caucasian young men. Osteoporos Int 28:549–558CrossRefPubMed Kepley AL, Nishiyama KK, Zhou B et al (2017) Differences in bone quality and strength between Asian and Caucasian young men. Osteoporos Int 28:549–558CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M, Guricci S (2002) Asians are different from Caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat per cent relationship. Obes Rev 3:141–146CrossRefPubMed Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M, Guricci S (2002) Asians are different from Caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat per cent relationship. Obes Rev 3:141–146CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Lear SA, Humphries KH, Kohli S et al (2007) The use of BMI and waist circumference as surrogates of body fat differs by ethnicity. Obesity 15:2817–2824CrossRefPubMed Lear SA, Humphries KH, Kohli S et al (2007) The use of BMI and waist circumference as surrogates of body fat differs by ethnicity. Obesity 15:2817–2824CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Lear SA, Humphries KH, Kohli S et al (2007) Visceral adipose tissue accumulation differs according to ethnic background: results of the Multicultural Community Health Assessment Trial (M-CHAT). Am J Clin Nutr 86:353–359CrossRefPubMed Lear SA, Humphries KH, Kohli S et al (2007) Visceral adipose tissue accumulation differs according to ethnic background: results of the Multicultural Community Health Assessment Trial (M-CHAT). Am J Clin Nutr 86:353–359CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Williams TK, Rosato EL, Kennedy EP et al (2009) Impact of obesity on perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 208:210–217CrossRefPubMed Williams TK, Rosato EL, Kennedy EP et al (2009) Impact of obesity on perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 208:210–217CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Palmeri M et al (2016) The learning curve in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 33:299–307CrossRefPubMed Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Palmeri M et al (2016) The learning curve in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 33:299–307CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Zhang T, Zhao ZM, Gao YX et al (2019) The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center. Surg Endosc 33:2927–2933CrossRefPubMed Zhang T, Zhao ZM, Gao YX et al (2019) The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center. Surg Endosc 33:2927–2933CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM et al (2018) Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine 97:e13000CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM et al (2018) Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine 97:e13000CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME et al (2015) Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 150:416–422CrossRefPubMed Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME et al (2015) Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 150:416–422CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Park CM, Park JS, Cho ES et al (2012) The effect of visceral fat mass on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Invest Surg 25:169–173CrossRefPubMed Park CM, Park JS, Cho ES et al (2012) The effect of visceral fat mass on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Invest Surg 25:169–173CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of body mass index on the early experience of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
Authors
Ying-Jui Chao
Ting-Kai Liao
Ping-Jui Su
Chih-Jung Wang
Yan-Shen Shan
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01065-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Updates in Surgery 3/2021 Go to the issue

Foreword

Foreword