Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer 4/2020

01-07-2020 | Obesity | Original Article

Body size, silhouette trajectory and the risk of breast cancer in a Moroccan case–control study

Authors: Mohamed Khalis, Laure Dossus, Sabina Rinaldi, Carine Biessy, Aurélie Moskal, Hafida Charaka, Emmanuel Fort, Mathilde His, Nawfel Mellas, Chakib Nejjari, Barbara Charbotel, Amr S. Soliman, Isabelle Romieu, Véronique Chajès, Marc J. Gunter, Inge Huybrechts, Karima El Rhazi

Published in: Breast Cancer | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is convincing evidence demonstrating that body size characteristics such as adiposity and height are associated with breast cancer in westernized countries. However, little is known about this relationship in North African countries currently undergoing nutritional transition and industrialization. The aim of this study was to explore associations between various body size characteristics, silhouette trajectories and the risk of breast cancer among Moroccan women.

Methods

In this case–control study conducted in the Fez region (2016–2017), detailed measures of body size were collected for 300 cases of breast cancer and 300 matched controls. Unconditional logistic regression was used to assess the association between body size and breast cancer risk adjusting for confounding factors.

Results

Higher waist circumference and hip circumference were positively associated with breast cancer risk in pre- (highest [T3] vs. lowest tertile [T1]: OR = 2.92, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.33–6.42; OR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.42–6.33, respectively) and post-menopausal women (T3 vs. T1: OR = 4.46, 95% CI: 1.86–10.66; OR = 4.08, 95% CI: 1.76–9.42, respectively). Body shape at younger ages (6–11 years) was inversely associated with the risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women (large vs. lean silhouette: OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12–0.80). Women with the greatest increase in body shape trajectory had higher risk for both pre- and post-menopausal breast cancer (T3 vs. T1: OR = 2.74, 95% CI: 1.03–7.26; OR = 3.56, 95% CI: 1.34–9.44, respectively).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that adiposity, body shape at younger ages, and silhouette trajectory may play a role in the development of pre- and post-menopausal breast cancer among Moroccan women. Larger-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings and to explore these associations with breast cancer subtypes.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Friedenreich CM. Review of anthropometric factors and breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2001;10:15–32.CrossRefPubMed Friedenreich CM. Review of anthropometric factors and breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2001;10:15–32.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics Books; 1988. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics Books; 1988.
16.
go back to reference Troy LM, Hunter DJ, Manson JE, et al. The validity of recalled weight among younger women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995;19:570–2.PubMed Troy LM, Hunter DJ, Manson JE, et al. The validity of recalled weight among younger women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995;19:570–2.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Stunkard AJ, Sorensen T, Schulsinger F (1983) Use of the Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness. In Kety S (ed) The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders. New York, pp 115-20. Stunkard AJ, Sorensen T, Schulsinger F (1983) Use of the Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness. In Kety S (ed) The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders. New York, pp 115-20.
18.
go back to reference Tehard B, van Liere MJ, Com Nougué C, Clavel-Chapelon F. Anthropometric measurements and body silhouette of women: validity and perception. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1779–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tehard B, van Liere MJ, Com Nougué C, Clavel-Chapelon F. Anthropometric measurements and body silhouette of women: validity and perception. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1779–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Jones B, Nagin DS. Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and an SAS procedure for estimating them. Stat Methods Res. 2007;35:542–71.CrossRef Jones B, Nagin DS. Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and an SAS procedure for estimating them. Stat Methods Res. 2007;35:542–71.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nagin DS. Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:139–57.CrossRef Nagin DS. Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:139–57.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, et al. Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:514–27.CrossRefPubMed van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, et al. Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:514–27.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Yager JD, Davidson NE. Mechanisms of disease: estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:270–82.CrossRefPubMed Yager JD, Davidson NE. Mechanisms of disease: estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:270–82.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Verla-Tebit E, Chang-Claude J. Anthropometric factors and the risk of premenopausal breast cancer in Germany. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2005;14:419–26.CrossRefPubMed Verla-Tebit E, Chang-Claude J. Anthropometric factors and the risk of premenopausal breast cancer in Germany. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2005;14:419–26.CrossRefPubMed
35.
37.
go back to reference Huang Z, Willett WC, Colditz GA, et al. Waist circumference, waist:hip ratio, and risk of breast cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:1316–24.CrossRefPubMed Huang Z, Willett WC, Colditz GA, et al. Waist circumference, waist:hip ratio, and risk of breast cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:1316–24.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Harvie M, Hooper L, Howell AH. Central obesity and breast cancer risk: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2003;4:157–73.CrossRefPubMed Harvie M, Hooper L, Howell AH. Central obesity and breast cancer risk: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2003;4:157–73.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Body size, silhouette trajectory and the risk of breast cancer in a Moroccan case–control study
Authors
Mohamed Khalis
Laure Dossus
Sabina Rinaldi
Carine Biessy
Aurélie Moskal
Hafida Charaka
Emmanuel Fort
Mathilde His
Nawfel Mellas
Chakib Nejjari
Barbara Charbotel
Amr S. Soliman
Isabelle Romieu
Véronique Chajès
Marc J. Gunter
Inge Huybrechts
Karima El Rhazi
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Breast Cancer / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01072-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Breast Cancer 4/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine