Top

Published in:

13-08-2022 | Nutrition | Review

A Review of Interventions to Increase WIC Enrollment and Participation

Authors: Rebekah A. Davis, Hannah B. Leavitt, Melissa Chau

Published in: Journal of Community Health | Issue 6/2022

Abstract

Our goal was to identify strategies aimed at increasing Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) enrollment and participation rates. The WIC program provides many health benefits for pregnant women, mothers, and children. WIC offers nutrition education, formula, fruits and vegetables, and other food to pregnant and postpartum women and their children until they reach the age of five. Despite the availability of this program nationwide, enrollment and participation rates remain low across the country. Several states have tried various interventions to combat this deficiency of engagement with the goal of increasing WIC enrollment and participation. We conducted a scoping review to identify articles based on pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently identified and screened articles. Subsequently, three reviewers independently extracted study details and outcomes related to WIC enrollment and participation rate changes. We included 14 studies reporting on 12 interventions from 3945 citations reviewed. Seven of these were published papers, while the others were final reports of USDA WIC Special Grant Projects. All the observed interventions had some success increasing WIC participation. Virtual interventions demonstrated the most success based on preliminary evidence. Successful interventions showed percentage gains in enrollment close to 8% and changes in participation over 9%. Overall, the literature surrounding WIC enrollment interventions reveal a mixed impact on improving participation. Many successful interventions involve an online or virtual engagement component which can provide educational resources on WIC benefits, nutrition, and living a healthy lifestyle.

Available only for authorised users

US Department of Agriculture. (2021). WIC Special Project Grants. Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/wic-special-project-grants

Owen, A. L., & Owen, G. M. (1997). Twenty years of WIC: A review of some effects of the program. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 97(7), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00191-0CrossRefPubMed

Currie, J., & Rajani, I. (2015). Within-mother estimates of the effects of WIC on birth outcomes in New York City. Economic Inquiry, 53(4), 1691–1701. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12219CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Weinfield, N. S., Borger, C., Au, L. E., Whaley, S. E., Berman, D., & Ritchie, L. D. (2020). Longer participation in WIC is associated with better diet quality in 24-month-old children. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 120(6), 963–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2019.12.012CrossRefPubMed

Jackson, M. I. (2015). Early childhood WIC participation, cognitive development and academic achievement. Social Science and Medicine, 126, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.018CrossRefPubMed

Figlio, D., Hamersma, S., & Roth, J. (2009). Does prenatal WIC participation improve birth outcomes? New evidence from Florida. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.08.003CrossRef

Schramm, W. F. (1985). WIC prenatal participation and its relationship to newborn Medicaid costs in Missouri: A cost/benefit analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 75(8), 851–857. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.75.8.851CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Smith, K. (2016). Fewer than half of WIC-eligible families receive WIC benefits. Carsey School of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.34051/p/2020.267CrossRef

USDA ERS - WIC Participation Continues To Decline. Retrieved May 26, 2022, from https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2017/june/wic-participation-continues-to-decline

10.

Gago, C. M., Wynne, J. O., Moore, M. J., et al. (2022). Caregiver perspectives on underutilization of WIC: A qualitative study. Pediatrics, 149(2), e2021053889. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-053889CrossRefPubMed

11.

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616CrossRef

12.

Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

TIDieR | Author tool. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from http://www.tidierguide.org/#/author-tool

14.

Vasan, A., Kenyon, C. C., Feudtner, C., Fiks, A. G., & Venkataramani, A. S. (2021). Association of WIC participation and electronic benefits transfer implementation. JAMA Pediatrics, 175(6), 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.6973CrossRefPubMed

15.

Vasan, A., Kenyon, C. C., Roberto, C. A., Fiks, A. G., & Venkataramani, A. S. (2021). Association of remote vs in-person benefit delivery with WIC participation during the covid-19 pandemic. JAMA, 326(15), 1531–1533. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.14356CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

US Department of Agriculture. (2022, April 27). WIC Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved July 21, 2022, from https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/frequently-asked-questions

17.

Seidel, M., Brink, L., Hamilton, M., & Gordon, L. (2018). Increasing WIC farmers’ market nutrition program redemption rates: Results and policy recommendations. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 12(4), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2018.0068CrossRef

18.

Di Noia, J., Monica, D., Cullen, K. W., & Sikorskii, A. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of nutrition education to promote farmers’ market fruit and vegetable purchases and consumption among women enrolled in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC): Rationale and design of the WIC Fresh Start program. BMC Nutrition, 1(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-015-0032-8CrossRef

19.

Zhang, J., Zhang, Q., Tang, C., et al. (2022). The role of generic price look-up code in WIC benefit redemptions. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156221092418CrossRef

20.

Sekhobo, J. P., Peck, S. R., Byun, Y., et al. (2017). Use of a mixed-method approach to evaluate the implementation of retention promotion strategies in the New York State WIC program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 63, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.03.002CrossRefPubMed

21.

USDA Food and Nutrition Service. (2016). WIC Farmers Market Nutrition Program for FY 2014. Retrieved July 13, 2022, from https://www.fns.usda.gov/fmnp/wic-farmers-market-nutrition-program

22.

Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. (2022). How administrative burdens can harm health. Health Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1377/hpb20200904.405159CrossRef

23.

Maneely, J. (April 27, 2021). Matching data across benefit programs can increase WIC enrollment. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/matching-data-across-benefit-programs-can-increase-wic-enrollment

24.

Reinvigorating and Reimaging The Pennsylvania WIC Program. WHAMglobal. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://www.whamglobal.org/blog/viewall/reinvigorating-and-reimaging-the-pennsylvania-wic-program

25.

Summary of WIC State Agency Strategies for Increasing Child Retention. WIC Works Resource System. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://wicworks.fns.usda.gov/resources/summary-wic-state-agency-strategies-increasing-child-retention

26.

Barnes, C., & Riel, V. (2022). “I don’t know nothing about that:” How “learning costs” undermine COVID-related efforts to make SNAP and WIC more accessible. Administration & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211073948CrossRef

27.

Vasan, A. (September 8, 2021). The impact of in-person benefit reloading on WIC participation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://policylab.chop.edu/blog/impact-person-benefit-reloading-wic-participation-during-covid-19-pandemic

28.

Au, L. E., Whaley, S., Gurzo, K., Meza, M., & Ritchie, L. D. (2016). If you build it they will come: Satisfaction of WIC participants with online and traditional in-person nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 48(5), 336-342.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2016.02.011CrossRefPubMed

Title: A Review of Interventions to Increase WIC Enrollment and Participation
Authors: Rebekah A. Davis
Hannah B. Leavitt
Melissa Chau
Publication date: 13-08-2022
Publisher: Springer US
Keyword: Nutrition
Published in: Journal of Community Health / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-022-01131-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

A Review of Interventions to Increase WIC Enrollment and Participation

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Health Professions Students’ Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes Toward Transgender Healthcare

Correction to: Factors Responsible for Healthcare Avoidance Among Rural Adults in the Eastern Region of North Carolina

Mental Health Stigma Reduction in the Midwestern United States: Evidence from a Digital Campaign Using a Collective Impact Model

Self-reported anxiety and depression problems and suicide ideation among black and latinx adults and the moderating role of social support

Stress and Health Status Among Members of a Disadvantaged Community in Flint, Michigan in the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Examining Psychosocial Correlates of a Home Smoking Ban Among Low-income Smokers: Analysis of Social Support, Unmet Social Needs, Perceived Stress, and Depressive Symptoms