Top

Published in:

01-04-2013 | Research Article

Numbers reorient visuo-spatial attention during cancellation tasks

Authors: Samuel Di Luca, Mauro Pesenti, Giuseppe Vallar, Luisa Girelli

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 4/2013

Abstract

Numbers induce shifts of spatial attention on the left or the right sides of external space as a function of their magnitude. However, whether this number–space association is restricted to the linear horizontal extensions, or extends to the whole visual scene, is still an open question. This study investigates, by means of a cancellation paradigm, the influence of numerical magnitude during scanning tasks in which participants freely explore complex visual scenes unconstrained towards either the horizontal or the vertical unidimensional axes. Five cancellation tasks were adapted in which Arabic digits were used as targets or distracters, in structured (lines and columns) or unstructured visual displays, with a smaller (2 or 3 types of distracters) or larger (10 or more types of distracters) sets of stimuli. Results show that the participants’ hits distribution was a function of number magnitude: shifted on the left for small and on the right for large numbers. This effect was maximised when numerical cues were sparse, randomly arranged and, critically, irrelevant to the task. Overall, this study provides novel evidence from visuo-spatial exploratory cancellation tasks for an attentional shift induced by number magnitude.

Axenfeld D (1894) Eine einfache Methode Hemianopsie zu constatiren. Neurologisches Centralblatt 13:437–438

Bowers D, Heilman KM (1980) Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 18:491–498CrossRefPubMed

Cappelletti M, Freeman ED, Cipolotti L (2007) The middle house or the middle floor: bisecting horizontal or vertical mental number lines in neglect. Neuropsychologia 45(13):2989–3000CrossRefPubMed

Cattaneo Z, Silvanto J, Pascual-Leone A, Battelli L (2009) The middle range of the number line orients attention to the left side of visual space. Cogn Neuropsychol 26(3):235–246CrossRefPubMed

Cattaneo Z, Fantino M, Tinti C, Silvanto J, Vecchi T (2010) Crossmodal interaction between the mental number line and peripersonal haptic space representation in sighted and blind individuals. Psychon Soc 72(4):885–890

Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

Dawes S, Senior G (2001) Australian normative data and clinical utility of the Mesulam and Weintraub Cancellation Test. In: Poster presented at the 21st annual conference of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, San Francisco, California, USA

de Hevia MD, Girelli L, Vallar G (2006) Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion? Exp Brain Res 168:254–264CrossRef

Dehaene S (1992) Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition 44:1–42CrossRefPubMed

Doricchi F, Guariglia P, Gasparini M, Tomaiuolo F (2005) Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage. Nat Neurosci 8(12):1663–1665CrossRefPubMed

Fischer MH (2001) Number processing induces spatial performance biases. Neurology 57(5):822–826CrossRefPubMed

Fischer MH, Castel AD, Dodd MD, Pratt J (2003) Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nat Neurosci 6(6):555–556CrossRefPubMed

Friesen CK, Kingstone A (1998) The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychon Bull Rev 5:490–495CrossRef

Galfano G, Pavani F (2005) Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows. Exp Brain Res 166:518–527CrossRefPubMed

Galfano G, Rusconi E, Umiltà C (2006) Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will. Psychon Bull Rev 13:869–874CrossRefPubMed

Galton F (1880) Visualised numerals. Nature 21:252–256CrossRef

Gevers W, Lammertyn J, Notebaert W, Verguts T, Fias W (2006) Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: evidence from the SNARC effect. Acta Psychol 122:221–233CrossRef

Halligan P, Wilson B, Cockburn JA (1990) A short screen test for visual neglect in stroke patients. Int Disabil Stud 12(3):95–99CrossRefPubMed

Hommel B, Pratt J, Colzato L, Godjin R (2001) Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychol Sci 123:360–365CrossRef

Huang HC, Wang TY (2008) Visualized representation of visual search patterns for a visuospatial attention test. Behav Res Methods 40(2):383–390CrossRefPubMed

Ifrah G (1981) Histoire universelle des chiffres. Robert Laffont, Paris

Ito Y, Hatta T (2004) Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: evidence for the SNARC effect. Mem Cogn 32:662–673CrossRef

Jewell G, McCourt ME (2000) Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38:93–110CrossRefPubMed

Jonides J (1981) Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In: Long JB, Baddley AD (eds) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 187–203

Keus IM, Jenks KM, Schwarz W (2005) Psychophysical evidence that the SNRAC effect has its functional locus in the response selection stage. Cogn Brain Res 24:48–56CrossRef

Maass A, Suitner C, Favaretto X, Cignacchi M (2009) Groups in space: stereotypes and the spatial agency bias. J Exp Soc Psychol 45:495–504CrossRef

Mapelli D, Rusconi E, Umiltà C (2003) The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? Cognition 88:B1–B10CrossRefPubMed

Mark VW, Monson N (1997) Two-dimensional cancellation neglect: a review and suggested method of analysis. Cortex 33:553–562CrossRefPubMed

Mesulam MM (1985) Attention, confusional states, and neglect. In: Mesulam MM (ed) Principles of behavioural neurology. Davis, Philadelphia, pp 125–168

Nicholls MER, Loftus AM, Gevers W (2008) Look, no hands: a perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention. Psychon Bull Rev 15(2):413–418CrossRefPubMed

Pia L, Folegatti A, Guagliardo M, Genero R, Gindri P (2009) Are drawing perseverations part of the neglect syndrome? Cortex 45(3):293–299CrossRefPubMed

Restle F (1970) Speed of adding and comparing numbers. J Exp Psychol 83:274–278CrossRef

Ristic J, Wright A, Kingstone A (2006) The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychon Bull Rev 13(5):862–868CrossRefPubMed

Ronchi R, Algeri L, Chiapella L, Spada MS, Vallar G (2012) Spatial neglect and perseveration in visuo-motor exploration. Neuropsychology 26:588–603CrossRefPubMed

Rossetti Y, Jacquin-Courtois S, Rode G, Ota H, Michel C, Boisson D (2004) Does action make the link between number and space representation? Visuo-manual adaptation improves number bisection in unilateral neglect. Psychol Sci 15:426–430CrossRefPubMed

Schneider W, Eschmann A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-Prime reference guide. Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh

Schwarz W, Keus IM (2004) Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Percept Psychophys 66:651–664CrossRefPubMed

Seron X, Pesenti M, Noël MP, Deloche G, Cornet JA (1992) Images of numbers, or “when 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue”. Cognition 44:159–196CrossRefPubMed

Stoianov E, Kramer P, Umiltà C, Zorzi M (2008) Visuo-spatial priming of the mental number line. Cognition 106:770–779CrossRefPubMed

To MP, Regan BC, Wood D, Mollon JD (2011) Vision out of the corner of the eye. Vis Res 51(1):203–214CrossRefPubMed

Vallar G, Bolognini N (2012) Unilateral spatial neglect. In: Nobre AC, Kastner S (eds) The Oxford handbook of attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Weintraub S, Mesulam MM (1985) Mental state assessment of young and elderly adults in behavioural neurology. In: Mesulam MM (ed) Principles of behavioural neurology. Davis, Philadelphia, pp 71–123

Zebian S (2005) Linkages between number, concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: the SNARC effect and the reverse of SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. J Cogn Cult 5:165–190CrossRef

Zorzi M, Priftis K, Umiltà C (2002) Brain damage: neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature 417:138–139CrossRefPubMed

Zubin J (1935) Note on a transformation function for proportions and percentages. J Appl Psychol 19(2):213–220CrossRef

Title: Numbers reorient visuo-spatial attention during cancellation tasks
Authors: Samuel Di Luca
Mauro Pesenti
Giuseppe Vallar
Luisa Girelli
Publication date: 01-04-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Experimental Brain Research / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3393-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Numbers reorient visuo-spatial attention during cancellation tasks

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Which factors are important for crossmodal attentional effect?

Nonvisual learning of intrinsic object properties in a reaching task dissociates grasp from reach

Cross-modal prediction in speech depends on prior linguistic experience

Chronic homocysteine exposure causes changes in the intrinsic electrophysiological properties of cultured hippocampal neurons

Effects of task complexity on grip-to-load coordination in bimanual actions

Higher-order action planning for individual and joint object manipulations