Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2-3/2008

01-03-2008 | Genetics

Nuclei size in relation to nuclear status and aneuploidy rate for 13 chromosomes in donated four cells embryos

Authors: I. E. Agerholm, C. Hnida, D. G. Crüger, C. Berg, G. Bruun-Petersen, S. Kølvraa, S. Ziebe

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 2-3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to elucidate if the nuclear size and number are indicative of aberrant chromosome content in human blastomeres and embryos.

Methods

The number of nuclei and the nucleus and blastomere size were measured by a computer controlled system for multilevel analysis. Then the nuclei were enumerated for 13 chromosomes by a combination of PNA and DNA probes.

Results

In the mononucleated embryos there was no difference in the mean size of chromosomally normal and abnormal nuclei but a significant difference in the mean nuclei size of nuclei that had gained chromosomes compared to nuclei that had lost chromosomes. The nuclei from multinucleated blastomeres had a significant smaller mean size and the frequency of chromosomally aberrant blastomeres was significantly higher.

Conclusion

The mean nuclear size is not a marker for the chromosome content in mononucleated embryos. However, it seems that the nuclei size can be related to multinucleation and maybe to the chromosome content.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ziebe S, Lundin K, Loft A, Bergh C, Nyboe Andersen AN, Selleskog U, et al. FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2575–81.PubMedCrossRef Ziebe S, Lundin K, Loft A, Bergh C, Nyboe Andersen AN, Selleskog U, et al. FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2575–81.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kats-Jaffe MG, Trounson AO, Cram DS. Mitotic errors in chromosome 21 of human preimplantation embryos are associated with non-viability. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004;10:143–7.CrossRef Kats-Jaffe MG, Trounson AO, Cram DS. Mitotic errors in chromosome 21 of human preimplantation embryos are associated with non-viability. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004;10:143–7.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hardy K, Winston RM, Handyside AH. Binucleate blastomeres in preimplantation human embryos in vitro; failure if cytokinesis during early cleavage. Fertil Steril. 1993;70:60–6. Hardy K, Winston RM, Handyside AH. Binucleate blastomeres in preimplantation human embryos in vitro; failure if cytokinesis during early cleavage. Fertil Steril. 1993;70:60–6.
4.
go back to reference De Scisciolo C, Wright DL, Mayer JF, Gibbons W, Muasher AJ, Lanzendorf SE. Human embryo derived from in vitro and in vivo matured oocytes: analysis for chromosomal abnormalities and nuclear morphology. J Ass Reprod Gen. 2000;17:284–92.CrossRef De Scisciolo C, Wright DL, Mayer JF, Gibbons W, Muasher AJ, Lanzendorf SE. Human embryo derived from in vitro and in vivo matured oocytes: analysis for chromosomal abnormalities and nuclear morphology. J Ass Reprod Gen. 2000;17:284–92.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Meriano J, Clark C, Cadesky K, Laskin C. Binucleated and micronucleated blastomeres ind embryos derived from human assisted reproduction cycles. Reprod BioMed Online. 2004;9:511–20.PubMedCrossRef Meriano J, Clark C, Cadesky K, Laskin C. Binucleated and micronucleated blastomeres ind embryos derived from human assisted reproduction cycles. Reprod BioMed Online. 2004;9:511–20.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kligman I, Bendiva C, Alikani M, Munne S. The presence of multinucleated blastomeres in human embryos is correlated with chromosomal abnormalities. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1492–8.PubMed Kligman I, Bendiva C, Alikani M, Munne S. The presence of multinucleated blastomeres in human embryos is correlated with chromosomal abnormalities. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1492–8.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Yakin K. Impact of the presence of one or more multinucleated blastomeres on the developmental potential of the embryo to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:243–5.PubMedCrossRef Yakin K. Impact of the presence of one or more multinucleated blastomeres on the developmental potential of the embryo to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:243–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jackson KV, Ginsburg ES, Hornstein MD, Rein MS, Clark RN. Multinucleation in normally fertilized embryos is associated with an accelerated ovulation induction response and lower implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:60–6.PubMedCrossRef Jackson KV, Ginsburg ES, Hornstein MD, Rein MS, Clark RN. Multinucleation in normally fertilized embryos is associated with an accelerated ovulation induction response and lower implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:60–6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M, De Neubourg D, Valken burg M, Rychart G, Gerris J. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1062–9.PubMedCrossRef Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M, De Neubourg D, Valken burg M, Rychart G, Gerris J. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1062–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Moriwaki T, Suganuma N, Hayakawa M, Hibi H, Katsunata Y, Ogushi H, et al. Embryo evaluation by analysing blastomeres nuclei. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:152–6.PubMedCrossRef Moriwaki T, Suganuma N, Hayakawa M, Hibi H, Katsunata Y, Ogushi H, et al. Embryo evaluation by analysing blastomeres nuclei. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:152–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Munne S, Cohen J. Unsuitability of multinucleated human blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1120–5.PubMed Munne S, Cohen J. Unsuitability of multinucleated human blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1120–5.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hnida C, Engenheiro E, Ziebe S. Computer-controlled, multilevel, morphometric analysis of blastomere size as biomarker of fragmentation and multinuclearity in human embryos. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:288–93.PubMedCrossRef Hnida C, Engenheiro E, Ziebe S. Computer-controlled, multilevel, morphometric analysis of blastomere size as biomarker of fragmentation and multinuclearity in human embryos. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:288–93.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hardarson T, Hanson C, Sjogren A, Lundin K. Human embryos with uneven sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indication for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:313–8.PubMedCrossRef Hardarson T, Hanson C, Sjogren A, Lundin K. Human embryos with uneven sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indication for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:313–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and human implantation. A review. Placenta 2003;24:1–7.CrossRef Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and human implantation. A review. Placenta 2003;24:1–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Delhanty JD. Preimplantation genetics: an explanation for poor human fertility? Ann Hum Genet. 2001;65:331–8.PubMedCrossRef Delhanty JD. Preimplantation genetics: an explanation for poor human fertility? Ann Hum Genet. 2001;65:331–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wells D, Delhanty JD. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6:1055–62.PubMedCrossRef Wells D, Delhanty JD. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6:1055–62.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hnida C, Agerholm I, Ziebe S. Traditional detection versus computer-controlled multilevel analysis of nuclear structures from donated human embryos. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:665–71.PubMedCrossRef Hnida C, Agerholm I, Ziebe S. Traditional detection versus computer-controlled multilevel analysis of nuclear structures from donated human embryos. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:665–71.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Coonen E, Dumoulin CM, Ramaekers FCS, Hopman AHN. Optimal preparation of preimplantation embryo interphase nuclei for analysis by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Human Reprod. 1994;9:533–7. Coonen E, Dumoulin CM, Ramaekers FCS, Hopman AHN. Optimal preparation of preimplantation embryo interphase nuclei for analysis by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Human Reprod. 1994;9:533–7.
19.
go back to reference Agerholm I, Ziebe S, Williams B, Berg C, Crüger DG, Bruun-Petersen G, et al. Sequential FISH analysis using competitive displacement of labelled peptide nucleic acid probes for eight chromosomes in human blastomeres. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1072–7.PubMedCrossRef Agerholm I, Ziebe S, Williams B, Berg C, Crüger DG, Bruun-Petersen G, et al. Sequential FISH analysis using competitive displacement of labelled peptide nucleic acid probes for eight chromosomes in human blastomeres. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1072–7.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference McKenzie LJ, Carson SA, Marcelli S, Rooney E, Cisneros P, Torsky S, et al. Nuclear chromosomal localization in human preimplantation embryos: correlation with aneuploidy and embryos morphology. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2231–7.PubMedCrossRef McKenzie LJ, Carson SA, Marcelli S, Rooney E, Cisneros P, Torsky S, et al. Nuclear chromosomal localization in human preimplantation embryos: correlation with aneuploidy and embryos morphology. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2231–7.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pickering SJ, Taylor A, Johnsom MH, Braude PR. An analysis of multinuclear blastomeres and their derivative daughter blastomeres. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1912–22.PubMed Pickering SJ, Taylor A, Johnsom MH, Braude PR. An analysis of multinuclear blastomeres and their derivative daughter blastomeres. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1912–22.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Delimetreva SM, Zhivkova RS, Vatev ITS, Toncheva DI. Chromosomal disorders and nuclear and cell destruction in cleaving human embryos. Int J Dev Biol. 2005;49:409–16.CrossRef Delimetreva SM, Zhivkova RS, Vatev ITS, Toncheva DI. Chromosomal disorders and nuclear and cell destruction in cleaving human embryos. Int J Dev Biol. 2005;49:409–16.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Saldeen P, Sundstrom P. Nuclear status of for cell preembryos predicts implantation potential in in vitro fertilization treatment cycles. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:584–9.PubMedCrossRef Saldeen P, Sundstrom P. Nuclear status of for cell preembryos predicts implantation potential in in vitro fertilization treatment cycles. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:584–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Nuclei size in relation to nuclear status and aneuploidy rate for 13 chromosomes in donated four cells embryos
Authors
I. E. Agerholm
C. Hnida
D. G. Crüger
C. Berg
G. Bruun-Petersen
S. Kølvraa
S. Ziebe
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 2-3/2008
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-008-9199-0

Other articles of this Issue 2-3/2008

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2-3/2008 Go to the issue