Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Novel citation-based search method for scientific literature: a validation study

Authors: A. Cecile J. W. Janssens, Marta Gwinn, J. Elaine Brockman, Kimberley Powell, Michael Goodman

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We recently developed CoCites, a citation-based search method that is designed to be more efficient than traditional keyword-based methods. The method begins with identification of one or more highly relevant publications (query articles) and consists of two searches: the co-citation search, which ranks publications on their co-citation frequency with the query articles, and the citation search, which ranks publications on frequency of all citations that cite or are cited by the query articles.

Methods

We aimed to reproduce the literature searches of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses and assess whether CoCites retrieves all eligible articles while screening fewer titles.

Results

A total of 250 reviews were included. CoCites retrieved a median of 75% of the articles that were included in the original reviews. The percentage of retrieved articles was higher (88%) when the query articles were cited more frequently and when they had more overlap in their citations. Applying CoCites to only the highest-cited article yielded similar results. The co-citation and citation searches combined were more efficient when the review authors had screened more than 500 titles, but not when they had screened less.

Conclusions

CoCites is an efficient and accurate method for finding relevant related articles. The method uses the expert knowledge of authors to rank related articles, does not depend on keyword selection and requires no special expertise to build search queries. The method is transparent and reproducible.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
8.
go back to reference Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1973;24(4):265–9.CrossRef Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1973;24(4):265–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference White HD, McCain KW. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1998;49(4):327–55. White HD, McCain KW. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1998;49(4):327–55.
15.
go back to reference van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Appropriate similarity measures for author co-citation analysis. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2008;59:1653–61.CrossRef van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Appropriate similarity measures for author co-citation analysis. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2008;59:1653–61.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gipp B, Beel J. Citation Proximity Analysis (CPA) - A New Approach for Identifying Related Work Based on Co-Citation Analysis. Proceedings of Issi 2009 - 12th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vol 2 2009;2:571–75. Gipp B, Beel J. Citation Proximity Analysis (CPA) - A New Approach for Identifying Related Work Based on Co-Citation Analysis. Proceedings of Issi 2009 - 12th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vol 2 2009;2:571–75.
21.
go back to reference Callahan A, Hockema S, Eysenbach G. Contextual Cocitation: augmenting Cocitation analysis and its applications. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2010;61(6):1130–43. Callahan A, Hockema S, Eysenbach G. Contextual Cocitation: augmenting Cocitation analysis and its applications. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2010;61(6):1130–43.
24.
go back to reference Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.CrossRefPubMed Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Simpson GG. Mammals and the nature of continents. Am J Sci. 1943;241:1–31.CrossRef Simpson GG. Mammals and the nature of continents. Am J Sci. 1943;241:1–31.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Novel citation-based search method for scientific literature: a validation study
Authors
A. Cecile J. W. Janssens
Marta Gwinn
J. Elaine Brockman
Kimberley Powell
Michael Goodman
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-0907-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2020 Go to the issue