Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2018

01-02-2018 | Original Article

Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals

Authors: Yasutsugu Yukawa, Fumihiko Kato, Kota Suda, Masatsune Yamagata, Takayoshi Ueta, Munehito Yoshida

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to establish normative data for parameters of spino-pelvic and spinal sagittal alignment, gender related differences and age-related changes in asymptomatic subjects.

Methods

A total of 626 asymptomatic volunteers from Japanese population were enrolled in this study, including 50 subjects at least for each gender and each decade from 3rd to 8th. Full length, free-standing spine radiographs were obtained. Cervical lordosis (CL; C3–7), thoracic kyphosis (TK; T1–12), lumbar lordosis (LL; T12–S1), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured.

Results

The average values (degrees) are 4.1 ± 11.7 for CL, 36.0 ± 10.1 for TK, 49.7 ± 11.2 for LL, 53.7 ± 10.9 for PI, 14.5 ± 8.4 for PT, and 39.4 ± 8.0 for SS. Mean SVA is 3.1 ± 12.6 mm. Advancing age caused an increase in CL, PT and SVA, and a decrease in LL and SS. There was a significant gender difference in CL, TK, LL, PI, PT and SVA. From 7th decade to 8th decade, remarkable decrease of LL & TK and increase of PT were seen. A large increase of SVA was also seen between 60’ and 70’.

Conclusion

Standard values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment were established in each gender and each decade from 20’ to 70’. A remarkable change of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment was seen from 7th decade to 8th decade in asymptomatic subjects.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L et al (2005) Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine 30(9):1082–1085CrossRefPubMed Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L et al (2005) Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine 30(9):1082–1085CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jackson RP, McManus AC (1994) Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 19(14):1611–1618CrossRefPubMed Jackson RP, McManus AC (1994) Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 19(14):1611–1618CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K et al (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30(6):682–688CrossRefPubMed Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K et al (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30(6):682–688CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S et al (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine 38(13):E803–E812CrossRefPubMed Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S et al (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine 38(13):E803–E812CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Yoshida G, Yasuda T, Togawa D et al (2014) Craniopelvic alignment in elderly asymptomatic individuals: analysis of 671 cranial centers of gravity. Spine 39(14):1121–1127CrossRefPubMed Yoshida G, Yasuda T, Togawa D et al (2014) Craniopelvic alignment in elderly asymptomatic individuals: analysis of 671 cranial centers of gravity. Spine 39(14):1121–1127CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K et al (2012) Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine–Part I, Radiographic data from over 1200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 21(8):1492–1498CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K et al (2012) Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine–Part I, Radiographic data from over 1200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 21(8):1492–1498CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20(12):1351–1358CrossRefPubMed Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20(12):1351–1358CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hardacker JW, Shuford RF, Capicotto PN et al (1997) Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine 22(13):1472–1480 (discussion 1480) CrossRefPubMed Hardacker JW, Shuford RF, Capicotto PN et al (1997) Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine 22(13):1472–1480 (discussion 1480) CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA et al (1998) Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine 23(2):211–215CrossRefPubMed Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA et al (1998) Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine 23(2):211–215CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J et al (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J et al (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV, Baikousis AG (1998) Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane in an asymptomatic Greek population. Spine 23(6):700–704 (discussion 704–5) CrossRefPubMed Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV, Baikousis AG (1998) Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane in an asymptomatic Greek population. Spine 23(6):700–704 (discussion 704–5) CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L et al (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(2):260–267CrossRefPubMed Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L et al (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(2):260–267CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J et al (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422 Epub 2005 Sep 23 CrossRefPubMed Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J et al (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422 Epub 2005 Sep 23 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O et al (2006) The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb line: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 31(11):E320–E325CrossRefPubMed Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O et al (2006) The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb line: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 31(11):E320–E325CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R et al (2006) Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine 31(25):E959–E967CrossRefPubMed Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R et al (2006) Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine 31(25):E959–E967CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kuntz C 4th, Levin LS, Ondra SL et al (2007) Neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults: a review and resynthesis of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 6(2):104–112CrossRefPubMed Kuntz C 4th, Levin LS, Ondra SL et al (2007) Neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults: a review and resynthesis of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 6(2):104–112CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey PM, Ondra S, Farcy JP (2008) Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine 33(14):1572–1578CrossRefPubMed Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey PM, Ondra S, Farcy JP (2008) Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine 33(14):1572–1578CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E et al (2011) Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):572–577CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E et al (2011) Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):572–577CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Kobayashi T, Abe T, Abe E, Shimada Y (2015) Improvement of spinal alignment and quality of life after corrective surgery for spinal kyphosis in patients with osteoporosis: a comparative study with non-operated patients. Osteoporos Int 26(11):2657–2664CrossRefPubMed Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Kobayashi T, Abe T, Abe E, Shimada Y (2015) Improvement of spinal alignment and quality of life after corrective surgery for spinal kyphosis in patients with osteoporosis: a comparative study with non-operated patients. Osteoporos Int 26(11):2657–2664CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Shimoda H, Ono M, Watanabe K. (2016) Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects. Eur Spine J. [Epub ahead of print] Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Shimoda H, Ono M, Watanabe K. (2016) Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects. Eur Spine J. [Epub ahead of print]
22.
go back to reference Dubousset J (1994) Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In: Weinstein SL (ed) The pediatric spine: principles and practice. Raven Press, New York, pp 480–481 Dubousset J (1994) Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In: Weinstein SL (ed) The pediatric spine: principles and practice. Raven Press, New York, pp 480–481
23.
go back to reference Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC et al (2013) Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 6):S834–S841CrossRefPubMed Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC et al (2013) Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 6):S834–S841CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals
Authors
Yasutsugu Yukawa
Fumihiko Kato
Kota Suda
Masatsune Yamagata
Takayoshi Ueta
Munehito Yoshida
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4807-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

European Spine Journal 2/2018 Go to the issue