Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Non-donors’ attitudes towards sperm donation and their willingness to donate

Authors: Veerle Provoost, Florence Van Rompuy, Guido Pennings

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this article is to study attitudes about sperm donation and willingness to donate sperm in students who have never shown an interest in sperm donation.

Methods

The method used in this study is an electronic survey of 1012 male students.

Results

Only one third of the respondents (34.3%) would consider donating sperm. Overall, 85.7% indicated a positive attitude towards sperm donation while 14.3% indicated a neutral or negative attitude. The highest scored barriers to donating were the lack of practical information and the fear that the partner would not agree. Almost 40% of the respondents feared that the donation might have a negative impact on their current or future relationship. The majority (83.6%) of those who considered donating thought donors should receive a financial compensation. Money was also one of the main motivators.

Conclusions

About 85% of the students thought positively about sperm donation but several factors such as perceived negative views by the social environment, especially the partner, may deter students from donating. This study indicates that the effect of strong incentives, for instance in monetary terms, on a donor pool consisting of students could be limited and that relational factors and donor’s perceptions of the views of the wider social network should be taken into account when recruiting donors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hudson N, Culley L, Rapport F, Johnson M, Bharadwai A. “Public” perceptions of gamete donation: a research review. Public Underst Sci. 2009;18:61–77.CrossRefPubMed Hudson N, Culley L, Rapport F, Johnson M, Bharadwai A. “Public” perceptions of gamete donation: a research review. Public Underst Sci. 2009;18:61–77.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Van den Broeck U, Vandermeeren M, Vanderschueren D, Enzlin P, Demyttenaere K, D'Hooghe T. A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:37–51.CrossRefPubMed Van den Broeck U, Vandermeeren M, Vanderschueren D, Enzlin P, Demyttenaere K, D'Hooghe T. A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:37–51.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lampiao F. What do male students at the college of medicine of the university of Malawi say about semen donation? TAF Prev Med Bul. 2013;12:75–8.CrossRef Lampiao F. What do male students at the college of medicine of the university of Malawi say about semen donation? TAF Prev Med Bul. 2013;12:75–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hedrih A, Hedrih V. Attitudes and motives of potential sperm donors in Serbia. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2012;69:49–57.CrossRefPubMed Hedrih A, Hedrih V. Attitudes and motives of potential sperm donors in Serbia. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2012;69:49–57.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Onah HE, Agnbata TA, Obi SN. Attitude to sperm donation among medical students in Enugu, South-Eastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28:96–9.CrossRefPubMed Onah HE, Agnbata TA, Obi SN. Attitude to sperm donation among medical students in Enugu, South-Eastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28:96–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ide L, Verheecke T, Decleer W, Osmanagaoglu K. Opinieonderzoek bij potentiële spermadonoren naar het mogelijk toekomstig gedrag van dergelijke donoren indien de Belgische wetgeving de anonimiteit van de donor zou opheffen. Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;71:1229–31. Ide L, Verheecke T, Decleer W, Osmanagaoglu K. Opinieonderzoek bij potentiële spermadonoren naar het mogelijk toekomstig gedrag van dergelijke donoren indien de Belgische wetgeving de anonimiteit van de donor zou opheffen. Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;71:1229–31.
7.
go back to reference Pennings G. Belgian law on medically assisted reproduction and the disposition of supernumerary embryos and gametes. Eur J Health Law. 2007;14:251–60.CrossRefPubMed Pennings G. Belgian law on medically assisted reproduction and the disposition of supernumerary embryos and gametes. Eur J Health Law. 2007;14:251–60.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cook R, Golombok S. A survey of semen donation: phase II - the view of the donors. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:951–9.CrossRefPubMed Cook R, Golombok S. A survey of semen donation: phase II - the view of the donors. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:951–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Heurckmans N, Pennings G, Sabbe K, Baetens P, Rigo A, Guldix E, et al. The attitude towards offspring by donor candidates and non-donors: the influence of payment, age, and fatherhood. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(suppl. 1):199. Heurckmans N, Pennings G, Sabbe K, Baetens P, Rigo A, Guldix E, et al. The attitude towards offspring by donor candidates and non-donors: the influence of payment, age, and fatherhood. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(suppl. 1):199.
10.
go back to reference Lui SC, Weaver SM. Attitudes and motives of semen donors and non-donors. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2061–6.CrossRefPubMed Lui SC, Weaver SM. Attitudes and motives of semen donors and non-donors. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2061–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fishburn Hedges/ICM, Donation of Eggs and Sperm UK Survey. 2004. Unpublished results. Fishburn Hedges/ICM, Donation of Eggs and Sperm UK Survey. 2004. Unpublished results.
12.
go back to reference Lyall H, Gould GW, Cameron IT. Should sperm donor be paid? A survey of the attitudes of the general public. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:771–5.CrossRefPubMed Lyall H, Gould GW, Cameron IT. Should sperm donor be paid? A survey of the attitudes of the general public. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:771–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies Canada. Proceed with care: final report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Ottawa: Canadian Government Publishing; 1993. Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies Canada. Proceed with care: final report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Ottawa: Canadian Government Publishing; 1993.
14.
go back to reference Eurobarometer Blood and cell and tissue donation. Special Eurobarometer 426/Wave EB82.2 – TNS Opinion & Social. Brussels: European Commission; 2015. Eurobarometer Blood and cell and tissue donation. Special Eurobarometer 426/Wave EB82.2 – TNS Opinion & Social. Brussels: European Commission; 2015.
15.
go back to reference Thijssen A, Dhont N, Vandormael E, Cox A, Klerkx E, Creemers E, et al. Artificial insemination with donor sperm (AID): heterogeneity in sperm banking facilities on a single country (Belgium). Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014;6:57–67.PubMedPubMedCentral Thijssen A, Dhont N, Vandormael E, Cox A, Klerkx E, Creemers E, et al. Artificial insemination with donor sperm (AID): heterogeneity in sperm banking facilities on a single country (Belgium). Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014;6:57–67.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Emond M, Scheib JE. Why not donate sperm? A study of potential donors. Evol Hum Behav. 1998;19:313–9.CrossRefPubMed Emond M, Scheib JE. Why not donate sperm? A study of potential donors. Evol Hum Behav. 1998;19:313–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Non-donors’ attitudes towards sperm donation and their willingness to donate
Authors
Veerle Provoost
Florence Van Rompuy
Guido Pennings
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1036-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1/2018 Go to the issue