Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2005

01-04-2005 | Editorial

Nomograms and Staging in Melanoma: New Tools for Better Predicting Outcomes

Authors: Douglas S. Tyler, MD, Charles M. Balch, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2005

Login to get access

Excerpt

Predicting outcomes for patients diagnosed with primary melanoma, as with any cancer, has several important utilities, including patient counseling, therapeutic decision making, designing and interpreting clinical trials, and optimizing health outcome assessments. Melanoma, more so than many other cancers, has lent itself to the development of predictive models initially based on microstaging methods, such as tumor depth using Breslow thickness and Clark level of invasion, and, more recently, to detecting micrometastases with the sentinel lymph node biopsy technique. In addition, a number of other factors have been associated with varying degrees of prognostic significance that reflect either patient-related factors (such as age, sex, site, or lymphatic drainage pattern) or tumor-related factors (such as ulceration, regression, vertical growth phase, mitotic rate, lymphovascular invasion, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, satellitosis, or perineural invasion). What has proven quite challenging, however, has been how to develop a useful staging system that tries to incorporate these multiple factors in a fashion that uses reliable and independent predictors of survival outcome and accurate prognostic modeling in the least invasive way possible. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Balch, CM, Buzaid, AC, Soong, SJ, et al. 2001Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanomaJ Clin Oncol19363548 Balch, CM, Buzaid, AC, Soong, SJ,  et al. 2001Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanomaJ Clin Oncol19363548
2.
go back to reference Balch, CM, Soong, SJ, Gerschenwald, JE, et al. 2001Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging systemJ Clin Oncol19362234 Balch, CM, Soong, SJ, Gerschenwald, JE,  et al. 2001Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging systemJ Clin Oncol19362234
3.
go back to reference Rousseau, DL, Ross, MI, Johnson, MM, et al. 2003Revised American Joint Committee on Cancer staging criteria accurately predict sentinel lymph node positivity in clinically node negative melanoma patientsAnn Surg Oncol1056974 Rousseau, DL, Ross, MI, Johnson, MM,  et al. 2003Revised American Joint Committee on Cancer staging criteria accurately predict sentinel lymph node positivity in clinically node negative melanoma patientsAnn Surg Oncol1056974
4.
go back to reference Wong SL, Kattan MW, McMasters KM, Coit DG. A nomogram that predicts the presence of sentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma with better discrimination than the joint American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Ann Surg Oncol (in press) Wong SL, Kattan MW, McMasters KM, Coit DG. A nomogram that predicts the presence of sentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma with better discrimination than the joint American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Ann Surg Oncol (in press)
5.
go back to reference Kalady, MF, White, R, Tyler, DS, Seigler, H 2003Prognostic factors associated with outcome for thin melanomas: analysis of a thirty year experienceAnn Surg23852837 Kalady, MF, White, R, Tyler, DS, Seigler, H 2003Prognostic factors associated with outcome for thin melanomas: analysis of a thirty year experienceAnn Surg23852837
6.
go back to reference Chao, C, Wong, SL, Ross, MI, et al. 2002Patterns of early recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanomaAm J Surg1845205 Chao, C, Wong, SL, Ross, MI,  et al. 2002Patterns of early recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanomaAm J Surg1845205
7.
go back to reference Wagner, JD, Ranieri, J, Evdokimow, DZ, et al. 2003Patterns of initial recurrence and prognosis after sentinel lymph node biopsy and selective lymphadenopathy for melanomaPlast Reconstr Surg11248697 Wagner, JD, Ranieri, J, Evdokimow, DZ,  et al. 2003Patterns of initial recurrence and prognosis after sentinel lymph node biopsy and selective lymphadenopathy for melanomaPlast Reconstr Surg11248697
8.
go back to reference Clary, BM, Brady, MS, Lewis, JJ, Coit, DG 2001Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: review of a large single institutional experience with emphasis on recurrenceAnn Surg2332508 Clary, BM, Brady, MS, Lewis, JJ, Coit, DG 2001Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: review of a large single institutional experience with emphasis on recurrenceAnn Surg2332508
9.
go back to reference Gimotty, PA, DuPont, G, Ming, ME, et al. 2004Thin primary cutaneous malignant melanoma: a prognostic tree for 10-year metastasis is more accurate than American Joint Committee on Cancer StagingJ Clin Oncol22366876 Gimotty, PA, DuPont, G, Ming, ME,  et al. 2004Thin primary cutaneous malignant melanoma: a prognostic tree for 10-year metastasis is more accurate than American Joint Committee on Cancer StagingJ Clin Oncol22366876
10.
go back to reference Leiter, U, Buettner, PG, Eigentler, TK, Garbe, C 2004Prognostic factors of thin cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of the central malignant melanoma registry of the German Dermatologic SocietyJ Clin Oncol2236607 Leiter, U, Buettner, PG, Eigentler, TK, Garbe, C 2004Prognostic factors of thin cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of the central malignant melanoma registry of the German Dermatologic SocietyJ Clin Oncol2236607
11.
go back to reference Essner, R, Chung, MH, Bleicher, R, Hsueh, E, Wanek, L, Morton, DL 2002Prognostic implications of thick (> or = 4 mm) melanoma in the era of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomyAnn Surg Oncol975461 Essner, R, Chung, MH, Bleicher, R, Hsueh, E, Wanek, L, Morton, DL 2002Prognostic implications of thick (> or = 4 mm) melanoma in the era of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomyAnn Surg Oncol975461
12.
go back to reference Bernard, K, Litman, E, Fitzpatrick, JL, et al. 2003Functional proteomic analysis of melanoma progressionCancer Res63671625 Bernard, K, Litman, E, Fitzpatrick, JL,  et al. 2003Functional proteomic analysis of melanoma progressionCancer Res63671625
13.
go back to reference Alonso, SR, Ortiz, P, Pollan, M, et al. 2004Progression in cutaneous malignant melanoma is associated with distinct expression profiles: a tissue microarray-based studyAm J Pathol164193203 Alonso, SR, Ortiz, P, Pollan, M,  et al. 2004Progression in cutaneous malignant melanoma is associated with distinct expression profiles: a tissue microarray-based studyAm J Pathol164193203
14.
go back to reference Carr, KM, Bittner, M, Trent, JM 2003Gene-expression profiling in human cutaneous melanomaOncogene22307680 Carr, KM, Bittner, M, Trent, JM 2003Gene-expression profiling in human cutaneous melanomaOncogene22307680
15.
go back to reference West, M, Blanchette, C, Dressman, H, et al. 2001Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profilesProc Natl Acad Sci U S A98114627 West, M, Blanchette, C, Dressman, H,  et al. 2001Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profilesProc Natl Acad Sci U S A98114627
Metadata
Title
Nomograms and Staging in Melanoma: New Tools for Better Predicting Outcomes
Authors
Douglas S. Tyler, MD
Charles M. Balch, MD
Publication date
01-04-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2005
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.02.915

Other articles of this Issue 4/2005

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2005 Go to the issue

Letters to the Editor

Letter to the Editor