Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 4/2016

01-04-2016 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

No significant difference in clinical outcome and knee stability between patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Authors: Christian Konrads, Stephan Reppenhagen, Piet Plumhoff, Maik Hoberg, Maximilian Rudert, Thomas Barthel

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

ACL reconstruction with either patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts are standard procedures. Between these two grafts might be differences in stability, morbidity, or long-term changes. This study investigates outcomes of ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon versus semitendinosus tendon autografts. We hypothesize no significant differences in clinical outcome and knee stability between both groups.

Methods

In a randomized prospective trial, we operated 62 ACL-deficient patients, 45 males and 17 females with a mean age of 29.8 years (min. 18, max. 44). We reconstructed the ligament using either autologous patellar tendon (n = 31) or semitendinosus tendon (n = 31). After 10 years of follow-up, we investigated 47 patients of the study. For evaluation we used a standard clinical examination including one-leg jump test and KT-1000 instrumental translation measure, visual analog pain scale, IKDC subjective knee form, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and standard X-rays of the knee.

Results

The data did not show any significant differences between the two groups. Between 5 and 10 years after ACL reconstruction both groups started to develop degenerative arthritic changes, which were detectable in standard radiographs of the knee. At 10-year follow-up mean IKDC for the BPTB group was 1.8 (min. 1, max. 3) and for the ST group it was 2.2 (min 1, max. 4), p = 0.35. Regarding Tegner activity scale after 10 years, the BPTB group showed a mean score of 5.9 (min. 4, max. 9) versus 5.1 (min. 3, max. 7) in the ST group, p = 0.53. For the Lysholm score the BPTB group reached a mean of 92.0 (min. 63, max. 98) and the ST group 91.8 (min. 62, max. 98) points, p = 0.66. There is a tendency for higher donor site morbidity in the BPTB group than in the ST group, p = 0.07.

Conclusions

Both, patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon are safe autografts for ACL reconstruction. Regarding graft selection, individual patient-dependent factors should be considered. ACL reconstruction cannot fully restore pre-injury status of knee joint function in the majority of cases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Filbay SR, Culvenor AG, Ackerman IN, Russell TG, Crossley KM (2015) Quality of life in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 49:1033–1041CrossRefPubMed Filbay SR, Culvenor AG, Ackerman IN, Russell TG, Crossley KM (2015) Quality of life in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 49:1033–1041CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 35:564–574CrossRefPubMed Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 35:564–574CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lidén M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Kartus J (2007) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35:740–748CrossRefPubMed Lidén M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Kartus J (2007) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35:740–748CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Barenius B, Nordlander M, Ponzer S, Tidermark J, Eriksson K (2010) Quality of life and clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon graft or quadrupled semitendinosus graft. Am J Sports Med 38:1533–1541CrossRefPubMed Barenius B, Nordlander M, Ponzer S, Tidermark J, Eriksson K (2010) Quality of life and clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon graft or quadrupled semitendinosus graft. Am J Sports Med 38:1533–1541CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Daniel DM, Malcolm LL, Stone ML, Perth H, Morgan J, Riehl B (1982) Quantification of knee stability and function. Contemp Orthop 5:83–91 Daniel DM, Malcolm LL, Stone ML, Perth H, Morgan J, Riehl B (1982) Quantification of knee stability and function. Contemp Orthop 5:83–91
6.
go back to reference Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumental measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726PubMed Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumental measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726PubMed
7.
go back to reference Price D, Bush F, Long S, Harkins S (1994) A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 56:217–226CrossRefPubMed Price D, Bush F, Long S, Harkins S (1994) A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 56:217–226CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob RP, Stäubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234CrossRefPubMed Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob RP, Stäubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hefti F, Müller W (1993) Current state of knee ligament lexions. The new IKDC knee evaluation form. Orthopade 22:351–362PubMed Hefti F, Müller W (1993) Current state of knee ligament lexions. The new IKDC knee evaluation form. Orthopade 22:351–362PubMed
10.
go back to reference Irrgang JJ, Ho H, Harner CD, Fu FH (1998) Use of the International Knee Documentation Committee guidelines to assess outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:107–114CrossRefPubMed Irrgang JJ, Ho H, Harner CD, Fu FH (1998) Use of the International Knee Documentation Committee guidelines to assess outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:107–114CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613PubMed Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613PubMed
12.
go back to reference Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N, Marchant M, Pietrobon R, Cook C (2007) Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form. Joint Bone Spine 74:594–599CrossRefPubMed Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N, Marchant M, Pietrobon R, Cook C (2007) Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form. Joint Bone Spine 74:594–599CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154CrossRefPubMed Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49PubMed Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49PubMed
15.
go back to reference Sherman MF, Warren RF, Marshall JL, Savatsky GJ (1988) A clinical and radiographical analysis of 127 anterior cruciate insufficient knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:22–237 Sherman MF, Warren RF, Marshall JL, Savatsky GJ (1988) A clinical and radiographical analysis of 127 anterior cruciate insufficient knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:22–237
16.
go back to reference Sherman MF, Lieber L, Bonamo JR, Podesta L, Reiter I (1991) The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Defining a rationale for augmentation. Am J Sports Med 19:243–255CrossRefPubMed Sherman MF, Lieber L, Bonamo JR, Podesta L, Reiter I (1991) The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Defining a rationale for augmentation. Am J Sports Med 19:243–255CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wipfler B, Donner S, Zechmann CM, Springer J, Siebold R, Paessler HH (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon: a prospective comparative study with 9-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 27:653–665CrossRefPubMed Wipfler B, Donner S, Zechmann CM, Springer J, Siebold R, Paessler HH (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon: a prospective comparative study with 9-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 27:653–665CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Barenius B, Ponzer S, Shalabi A, Bujak R, Norlén L, Eriksson K (2014) Increased risk of osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:1049–1057CrossRefPubMed Barenius B, Ponzer S, Shalabi A, Bujak R, Norlén L, Eriksson K (2014) Increased risk of osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:1049–1057CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Spahn G, Schiltenwolf M, Hartmann B, Grifka J, Hofmann GO, Klemm HT (2015) The time-related risk for knee osteoarthritis after ACL injury: results from a systematic review. Orthopade [Epub ahead of print] Spahn G, Schiltenwolf M, Hartmann B, Grifka J, Hofmann GO, Klemm HT (2015) The time-related risk for knee osteoarthritis after ACL injury: results from a systematic review. Orthopade [Epub ahead of print]
20.
go back to reference Struewer J, Ziring E, Frangen TM, Efe T, Meißner S, Buecking B, Bliemel C, Ishaque B (2013) Clinical outcome and prevalence of osteoarthritis after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring graft: follow-up after 2 and 10 years. Int Orthop 37:271–277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Struewer J, Ziring E, Frangen TM, Efe T, Meißner S, Buecking B, Bliemel C, Ishaque B (2013) Clinical outcome and prevalence of osteoarthritis after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring graft: follow-up after 2 and 10 years. Int Orthop 37:271–277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
No significant difference in clinical outcome and knee stability between patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Authors
Christian Konrads
Stephan Reppenhagen
Piet Plumhoff
Maik Hoberg
Maximilian Rudert
Thomas Barthel
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2386-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 4/2016 Go to the issue