Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer 5/2016

01-09-2016 | Original Article

Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander–implant reconstruction

Authors: Hiroki Mori, Noriko Uemura, Mutsumi Okazaki, Tsuyoshi Nakagawa, Takanobu Sato

Published in: Breast Cancer | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander–implant reconstruction performed in our institute between 2002 and 2010 was studied retrospectively, targeting breast ptosis and volume.

Methods

The preoperative nipple position relative to the inframammary fold was used as the breast ptosis index. The intraoperative resected breast tissue was measured and used as the volume index. For pre- and postoperative photograph evaluation, the vertical distance of the nipple was defined as the distance from the nipple to the midpoint of the bottoms of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The vertical distance ratio was defined as the postoperative affected-side/unaffected-side vertical distance to the preoperative one. A correlation analysis was carried out comparing the vertical distance ratios with the preoperative nipple position relative to the inframammary fold and resection tissue weight.

Results

A total of 42 cases using the expander–implant method were analyzed. The mean vertical distance ratio was 0.88. There was a comparatively high correlation between the vertical distance ratio and the resection tissue weight (correlation coefficient −0.53, P = 0.0003) and between the vertical distance ratio and the preoperative nipple position relative to the inframammary fold (correlation coefficient 0.37, P = 0.0152).

Conclusion

In expander–implant reconstruction of a large or ptotic breast, nipple-sparing mastectomy should be performed with the expectation that ancillary procedures will be needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Verheyden CN. Nipple-sparing total mastectomy of large breasts: the role of tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:1494–500.CrossRefPubMed Verheyden CN. Nipple-sparing total mastectomy of large breasts: the role of tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:1494–500.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cense HA, Rutgers EJ, Cardozo ML, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:521–6.CrossRefPubMed Cense HA, Rutgers EJ, Cardozo ML, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:521–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Freeman BS. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1962;30:676.CrossRef Freeman BS. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1962;30:676.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hinton CP, Doyle PJ, Blamey RW, et al. Subcutaneous mastectomy for primary operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 1984;71:469–72.CrossRefPubMed Hinton CP, Doyle PJ, Blamey RW, et al. Subcutaneous mastectomy for primary operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 1984;71:469–72.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TN. Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1083–90.CrossRefPubMed Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TN. Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1083–90.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wagner JL, Fearmonti R, Hunt KK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1137–44.CrossRefPubMed Wagner JL, Fearmonti R, Hunt KK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1137–44.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–29.CrossRefPubMed Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–29.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L. Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcomes and technical refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1460–71.CrossRefPubMed Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L. Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcomes and technical refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1460–71.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chu C, Carlson G. Techniques and outcomes of nipple sparing mastectomy in the surgical management of breast cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2013;5:118–24.CrossRef Chu C, Carlson G. Techniques and outcomes of nipple sparing mastectomy in the surgical management of breast cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2013;5:118–24.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Small K, Kelly KM, Swistel A, et al. Surgical treatment of nipple malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy device-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:1053–62.CrossRefPubMed Small K, Kelly KM, Swistel A, et al. Surgical treatment of nipple malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy device-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:1053–62.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Regnault P. Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 1976;3:193–203.PubMed Regnault P. Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 1976;3:193–203.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Daniel JR, Gasgarth R, Carlson GW. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technical aspects and aesthetic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:446–50.CrossRefPubMed Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Daniel JR, Gasgarth R, Carlson GW. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technical aspects and aesthetic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:446–50.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yano K, Hosokawa K, Masuoka T, et al. Options for immediate breast reconstruction following skin-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer. 2007;14:406–13.CrossRefPubMed Yano K, Hosokawa K, Masuoka T, et al. Options for immediate breast reconstruction following skin-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer. 2007;14:406–13.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kamioka N, Mori H, Okazaki M. Significant reduction of hypertrophic scarring by lateral vertical incision in skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Med Dent Sci. 2010;57:203–8.PubMed Kamioka N, Mori H, Okazaki M. Significant reduction of hypertrophic scarring by lateral vertical incision in skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Med Dent Sci. 2010;57:203–8.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. The nipple-sparing mastectomy: early results of a feasibility study of a new application of perioperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) in the treatment of breast cancer when mastectomy is indicated. Tumori. 2003;89:288–91.PubMed Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. The nipple-sparing mastectomy: early results of a feasibility study of a new application of perioperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) in the treatment of breast cancer when mastectomy is indicated. Tumori. 2003;89:288–91.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Taghian A, et al. George Peters award. Microscopic anatomy within the nipple: implications for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2007;194:433–7.CrossRefPubMed Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Taghian A, et al. George Peters award. Microscopic anatomy within the nipple: implications for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2007;194:433–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Crowe J, Patrick RJ, Yetman R, Djohan R. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106–10.CrossRefPubMed Crowe J, Patrick RJ, Yetman R, Djohan R. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106–10.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190:907–12.CrossRefPubMed Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190:907–12.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral alloderm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:232–9.CrossRefPubMed Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral alloderm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:232–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Spear SL, Seruya M, Clemens MW, et al. Acellular dermal matrix for the treatment and prevention of implant-associated breast deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1047–58.CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Seruya M, Clemens MW, et al. Acellular dermal matrix for the treatment and prevention of implant-associated breast deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1047–58.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Taneda H, Sakai S. Transposition technique for correction of a malpositioned nipple-areola complex after reconstruction following a nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67:579–82.CrossRefPubMed Taneda H, Sakai S. Transposition technique for correction of a malpositioned nipple-areola complex after reconstruction following a nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67:579–82.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Takayanagi S. Transposition of the malpositioned nipple-areola complex in breast reconstruction with implants. Aesth Plast Surg. 2010;34:52–8.CrossRef Takayanagi S. Transposition of the malpositioned nipple-areola complex in breast reconstruction with implants. Aesth Plast Surg. 2010;34:52–8.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mohmand H, Naasan A. Double U-plasty for correction of geometric malposition of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2019–22.CrossRefPubMed Mohmand H, Naasan A. Double U-plasty for correction of geometric malposition of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2019–22.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Frenkiel BA, Pacifico MD, Ritz M, Southwick G. A solution to the high-riding nipple-areola complex. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2010;34:525–7.CrossRef Frenkiel BA, Pacifico MD, Ritz M, Southwick G. A solution to the high-riding nipple-areola complex. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2010;34:525–7.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Spear SL, Albino FP, Al-Attar A. Repairing the high-riding nipple with reciprocal transposition flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:687–9.CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Albino FP, Al-Attar A. Repairing the high-riding nipple with reciprocal transposition flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:687–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander–implant reconstruction
Authors
Hiroki Mori
Noriko Uemura
Mutsumi Okazaki
Tsuyoshi Nakagawa
Takanobu Sato
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Breast Cancer / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0633-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Breast Cancer 5/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine