Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 3/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Research

Next Generation Sequencing in the Clinic: a Patterns of Care Study in a Retrospective Cohort of Subjects Referred to a Genetic Medicine Clinic for Suspected Lynch Syndrome

Authors: Carlos J. Gallego, Matthew L. Perez, Amber Burt, Laura M. Amendola, Brian H. Shirts, Colin C. Pritchard, Fuki M. Hisama, Robin L. Bennett, David L. Veenstra, Gail P. Jarvik

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Next generation sequencing (NGS) gene panels are increasingly used in medical genetics clinics for the evaluation of common inherited cancer syndromes, but the clinical efficacy of these tests, and the factors driving clinical providers to order them are unclear. We conducted a patterns-of-care study to compare patients evaluated with NGS gene panels with a reference group. We abstracted demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical information in a retrospective cohort of patients referred to a large medical genetics clinic for evaluation of inherited colorectal cancer and polyposis syndromes. Patients tested with NGS gene panels were more likely to be insured compared to the reference group (85.3 % vs. 69.2 %, p = 0.0068),less likely to have prior tumor tissue testing (29.4 % vs. 54.3 %, p = 0.0004), and less likely to have an abnormal tumor tissue test result (46.7 % vs. 74.5 %, p = 0.01). No significant differences were found between groups in age, gender, race, employment status, personal history of colorectal cancer, or proportion of patients fulfilling Lynch syndrome clinical criteria. Patients with NGS testing were less likely to have a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant detected (13.7 % vs. 31.9 %, p = 0.002). Patients referred for NGS testing to evaluate inherited colorectal cancer/polyposis risk appear to undergo tumor tissue testing less frequently than non-NGS testing patients. Further studies are needed to assess the most effective and cost-effective approach to genomic diagnosis in this patient population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Cragun, D., Radford, C., Dolinsky, J. S., Caldwell, M., Chao, E., & Pal, T. (2014). Panel-based testing for inherited colorectal cancer: a descriptive study of clinical testing performed by a US laboratory. Clinical Genetics, 86(6), 510–520. doi:10.1111/cge.12359.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cragun, D., Radford, C., Dolinsky, J. S., Caldwell, M., Chao, E., & Pal, T. (2014). Panel-based testing for inherited colorectal cancer: a descriptive study of clinical testing performed by a US laboratory. Clinical Genetics, 86(6), 510–520. doi:10.​1111/​cge.​12359.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Fecteau, H., Vogel, K. J., Hanson, K., & Morrill-Cornelius, S. (2014). The evolution of cancer risk assessment in the era of next generation sequencing. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.1007/s10897-014-9714-7.PubMed Fecteau, H., Vogel, K. J., Hanson, K., & Morrill-Cornelius, S. (2014). The evolution of cancer risk assessment in the era of next generation sequencing. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-014-9714-7.PubMed
go back to reference Gallego, C. J., Bennette, C. S., Heagerty, P., Comstock, B., Horike-Pyne, M., Hisama, F. M., Veenstra, D. L. (2014). Comparative effectiveness of next generation genomic sequencing for disease diagnosis: design of a randomized controlled trial in patients with colorectal cancer/polyposis syndromes. Contemporary Clinical Trials. Gallego, C. J., Bennette, C. S., Heagerty, P., Comstock, B., Horike-Pyne, M., Hisama, F. M., Veenstra, D. L. (2014). Comparative effectiveness of next generation genomic sequencing for disease diagnosis: design of a randomized controlled trial in patients with colorectal cancer/polyposis syndromes. Contemporary Clinical Trials.
go back to reference Gallego, C. J., Shirts, B. H., Bennette, C. S., Guzauskas, G., Amendola, L. M., Horike-Pyne, M.,... Veenstra, D. L. (2015). Next generation sequencing panels for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and polyposis syndromes: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, In Press. Gallego, C. J., Shirts, B. H., Bennette, C. S., Guzauskas, G., Amendola, L. M., Horike-Pyne, M.,... Veenstra, D. L. (2015). Next generation sequencing panels for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and polyposis syndromes: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, In Press.
go back to reference Kovacs, M. E., Papp, J., Szentirmay, Z., Otto, S., & Olah, E. (2009). Deletions removing the last exon of TACSTD1 constitute a distinct class of mutations predisposing to lynch syndrome. Human Mutation, 30(2), 197–203. doi:10.1002/humu.20942.CrossRefPubMed Kovacs, M. E., Papp, J., Szentirmay, Z., Otto, S., & Olah, E. (2009). Deletions removing the last exon of TACSTD1 constitute a distinct class of mutations predisposing to lynch syndrome. Human Mutation, 30(2), 197–203. doi:10.​1002/​humu.​20942.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lapunzina, P., Lopez, R. O., Rodriguez-Laguna, L., Garcia-Miguel, P., Martinez, A. R., & Martinez-Glez, V. (2014). Impact of NGS in the medical sciences: Genetic syndromes with an increased risk of developing cancer as an example of the use of new technologies. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 37(1 Suppl), 241–249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lapunzina, P., Lopez, R. O., Rodriguez-Laguna, L., Garcia-Miguel, P., Martinez, A. R., & Martinez-Glez, V. (2014). Impact of NGS in the medical sciences: Genetic syndromes with an increased risk of developing cancer as an example of the use of new technologies. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 37(1 Suppl), 241–249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Umar, A., Boland, C. R., Terdiman, J. P., Syngal, S., de la Chapelle, A., Ruschoff, J., … Srivastava, S. (2004). Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96(4), 261–268.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Umar, A., Boland, C. R., Terdiman, J. P., Syngal, S., de la Chapelle, A., Ruschoff, J., … Srivastava, S. (2004). Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96(4), 261–268.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Wolfe Schneider, K., Anguiano, A., Axell, L., Barth, C., Crow, K., Gilstrap, M.,... Freivogel, M. (2014). Collaboration of Colorado Cancer Genetic Counselors to Integrate Next Generation Sequencing Panels into Clinical Practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.1007/s10897-014-9718-3. Wolfe Schneider, K., Anguiano, A., Axell, L., Barth, C., Crow, K., Gilstrap, M.,... Freivogel, M. (2014). Collaboration of Colorado Cancer Genetic Counselors to Integrate Next Generation Sequencing Panels into Clinical Practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-014-9718-3.
Metadata
Title
Next Generation Sequencing in the Clinic: a Patterns of Care Study in a Retrospective Cohort of Subjects Referred to a Genetic Medicine Clinic for Suspected Lynch Syndrome
Authors
Carlos J. Gallego
Matthew L. Perez
Amber Burt
Laura M. Amendola
Brian H. Shirts
Colin C. Pritchard
Fuki M. Hisama
Robin L. Bennett
David L. Veenstra
Gail P. Jarvik
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9902-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Journal of Genetic Counseling 3/2016 Go to the issue