Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Invited Review Article

Next-generation sequencing-based clinical sequencing: toward precision medicine in solid tumors

Authors: Toshifumi Wakai, Pankaj Prasoon, Yuki Hirose, Yoshifumi Shimada, Hiroshi Ichikawa, Masayuki Nagahashi

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Numerous technical and functional advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have led to the adoption of this technique in conventional clinical practice. Recently, large-scale genomic research and NGS technological innovation have revealed many more details of somatic and germline mutations in solid tumors. This development is allowing for the classification of tumor type sub-categories based on genetic alterations in solid tumors, and based on this information, new drugs and targeted therapies are being administered to patients. This has largely been facilitated by gene panel testing, which allows for a better understanding of the genetic basis for an individual’s response to therapy. NGS-based comprehensive gene panel testing is a clinically useful approach to investigate genomic mechanisms, including therapy-related signaling pathways, microsatellite instability, hypermutated phenotypes, and tumor mutation burden. In this review, we describe the concept of precision medicine in solid tumors using NGS-based comprehensive gene panel testing, as well as the importance of quality control of tissue sample handling in routine NGS-based genomic testing, and we discuss issues for the future adoption of this technique in Japan.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S et al (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 366:883–892CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S et al (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 366:883–892CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Akbani R, Ng PK, Werner HM et al (2014) A pan-cancer proteomic perspective on The Cancer Genome Atlas. Nat Commun 5:3887CrossRefPubMed Akbani R, Ng PK, Werner HM et al (2014) A pan-cancer proteomic perspective on The Cancer Genome Atlas. Nat Commun 5:3887CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Robson ME, Bradbury AR, Arun B et al (2015) American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 33:3660–3667CrossRefPubMed Robson ME, Bradbury AR, Arun B et al (2015) American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 33:3660–3667CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Stanislaw C, Xue Y, Wilcox WR (2016) Genetic evaluation and testing for hereditary forms of cancer in the era of next-generation sequencing. Cancer Biol Med 13:55–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stanislaw C, Xue Y, Wilcox WR (2016) Genetic evaluation and testing for hereditary forms of cancer in the era of next-generation sequencing. Cancer Biol Med 13:55–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Pleasance ED, Cheetham RK, Stephens PJ et al (2010) A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome. Nature 463:191–196CrossRefPubMed Pleasance ED, Cheetham RK, Stephens PJ et al (2010) A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome. Nature 463:191–196CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Forbes SA, Beare D, Gunasekaran P et al (2015) COSMIC: exploring the world’s knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D805–D811CrossRefPubMed Forbes SA, Beare D, Gunasekaran P et al (2015) COSMIC: exploring the world’s knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D805–D811CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Clinical Lung Cancer Genome Project (CLCGP); Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) (2013) A genomics-based classification of human lung tumors. Sci Transl Med 5:209ra153CrossRef Clinical Lung Cancer Genome Project (CLCGP); Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) (2013) A genomics-based classification of human lung tumors. Sci Transl Med 5:209ra153CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wu K, Huang RS, House L et al (2013) Next-generation sequencing for lung cancer. Future Oncol 9:1323–1336CrossRefPubMed Wu K, Huang RS, House L et al (2013) Next-generation sequencing for lung cancer. Future Oncol 9:1323–1336CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lianos GD, Mangano A, Cho WC et al (2015) From standard to new genome-based therapy of gastric cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:1023–1026CrossRefPubMed Lianos GD, Mangano A, Cho WC et al (2015) From standard to new genome-based therapy of gastric cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:1023–1026CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
21.
22.
go back to reference Nagahashi M, Shimada Y, Ichikawa H et al (2017) Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sample conditions for deep next generation sequencing. J Surg Res 220:125–132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nagahashi M, Shimada Y, Ichikawa H et al (2017) Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sample conditions for deep next generation sequencing. J Surg Res 220:125–132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Arreaza G, Qiu P, Pang L et al (2016) Pre-analytical considerations for successful next-generation Sequencing (NGS): challenges and opportunities for formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue (FFPE) samples. Int J Mol Sci 17(9):1579CrossRefPubMedCentral Arreaza G, Qiu P, Pang L et al (2016) Pre-analytical considerations for successful next-generation Sequencing (NGS): challenges and opportunities for formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue (FFPE) samples. Int J Mol Sci 17(9):1579CrossRefPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Stephens PJ, Greenman CD, Fu B et al (2011) Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144:27–40CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stephens PJ, Greenman CD, Fu B et al (2011) Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144:27–40CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Le Tourneau C, Delord JP, Goncalves A et al (2015) Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1324–1334CrossRefPubMed Le Tourneau C, Delord JP, Goncalves A et al (2015) Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1324–1334CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Xue Y, Ankala A, Wilcox WR et al (2015) Solving the molecular diagnostic testing conundrum for Mendelian disorders in the era of next-generation sequencing: single-gene, gene panel, or exome/genome sequencing. Genet Med 17:444–451CrossRefPubMed Xue Y, Ankala A, Wilcox WR et al (2015) Solving the molecular diagnostic testing conundrum for Mendelian disorders in the era of next-generation sequencing: single-gene, gene panel, or exome/genome sequencing. Genet Med 17:444–451CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Horak P, Fröhling S, Glimm H (2016) Integrating next-generation sequencing into clinical oncology: strategies, promises and pitfalls. ESMO Open 1(5):e000094CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Horak P, Fröhling S, Glimm H (2016) Integrating next-generation sequencing into clinical oncology: strategies, promises and pitfalls. ESMO Open 1(5):e000094CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
32.
33.
34.
go back to reference Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 487:330–337CrossRef Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 487:330–337CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Nagahashi M, Wakai T, Shimada Y et al (2016) Genomic landscape of colorectal cancer in Japan: clinical implications of comprehensive genomic sequencing for precision medicine. Genome Med 8:136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nagahashi M, Wakai T, Shimada Y et al (2016) Genomic landscape of colorectal cancer in Japan: clinical implications of comprehensive genomic sequencing for precision medicine. Genome Med 8:136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Mensenkamp AR, Vogelaar IP, van Zelst-Stams WA et al (2014) Somatic mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 are a frequent cause of mismatch-repair deficiency in Lynch syndrome-like tumors. Gastroenterology 146:643–646.e648CrossRefPubMed Mensenkamp AR, Vogelaar IP, van Zelst-Stams WA et al (2014) Somatic mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 are a frequent cause of mismatch-repair deficiency in Lynch syndrome-like tumors. Gastroenterology 146:643–646.e648CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Kautto EA, Bonneville R, Miya J et al (2017) Performance evaluation for rapid detection of pan-cancer microsatellite instability with MANTIS. Oncotarget 8:7452–7463CrossRefPubMed Kautto EA, Bonneville R, Miya J et al (2017) Performance evaluation for rapid detection of pan-cancer microsatellite instability with MANTIS. Oncotarget 8:7452–7463CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Hause RJ, Pritchard CC, Shendure J et al (2016) Classification and characterization of microsatellite instability across 18 cancer types. Nat Med 22:1342–1350CrossRefPubMed Hause RJ, Pritchard CC, Shendure J et al (2016) Classification and characterization of microsatellite instability across 18 cancer types. Nat Med 22:1342–1350CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
42.
go back to reference Chang F, Li MM (2013) Clinical application of amplicon-based next-generation sequencing in cancer. Cancer Genet 206:413–419CrossRefPubMed Chang F, Li MM (2013) Clinical application of amplicon-based next-generation sequencing in cancer. Cancer Genet 206:413–419CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Hampel H, Bennett RL, Buchanan A, Pearlman R et al (2015) A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment. Genet Med 17:70–87CrossRefPubMed Hampel H, Bennett RL, Buchanan A, Pearlman R et al (2015) A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment. Genet Med 17:70–87CrossRefPubMed
45.
46.
go back to reference LeBlanc VG, Marra MA (2015) Next-generation sequencing approaches in cancer: where have they brought us and where will they take us? Cancers (Basel) 7:1925–1958CrossRef LeBlanc VG, Marra MA (2015) Next-generation sequencing approaches in cancer: where have they brought us and where will they take us? Cancers (Basel) 7:1925–1958CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB et al (2017) Breast cancer-major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 67:290–303CrossRefPubMed Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB et al (2017) Breast cancer-major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 67:290–303CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Buchtel KM, Vogel Postula KJ, Weiss S et al (2018) FDA approval of PARP inhibitors and the impact on genetic counseling and genetic testing practices. J Genet Couns 27:131–139CrossRefPubMed Buchtel KM, Vogel Postula KJ, Weiss S et al (2018) FDA approval of PARP inhibitors and the impact on genetic counseling and genetic testing practices. J Genet Couns 27:131–139CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Moreira RB, Alessandretti MB, Abrahao CM et al (2015) Next-generation sequencing (NGS) in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer (mGIC) patients: translation from sequence data into clinical practice. J Clin Oncol 33:72–72CrossRef Moreira RB, Alessandretti MB, Abrahao CM et al (2015) Next-generation sequencing (NGS) in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer (mGIC) patients: translation from sequence data into clinical practice. J Clin Oncol 33:72–72CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Lerner-Ellis J, Khalouei S, Sopik V (2015) Genetic risk assessment and prevention: the role of genetic testing panels in breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 15:1315–1326CrossRefPubMed Lerner-Ellis J, Khalouei S, Sopik V (2015) Genetic risk assessment and prevention: the role of genetic testing panels in breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 15:1315–1326CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Shimomura A, Shiino S, Kawauchi J et al (2016) Novel combination of serum microRNA for detecting breast cancer in the early stage. Cancer Sci 107:326–334CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shimomura A, Shiino S, Kawauchi J et al (2016) Novel combination of serum microRNA for detecting breast cancer in the early stage. Cancer Sci 107:326–334CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Next-generation sequencing-based clinical sequencing: toward precision medicine in solid tumors
Authors
Toshifumi Wakai
Pankaj Prasoon
Yuki Hirose
Yoshifumi Shimada
Hiroshi Ichikawa
Masayuki Nagahashi
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1375-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine