Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2013

01-04-2013 | Letter to the Editor

Next-generation, genome- and mutational landscape heterogeneity-based novel biomarkers for personalized neoadjuvant treatment and laparoscopic rectal cancer resection

Author: Christof Hottenrott

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

Based on previous phase 3 randomized clinical trials suggesting patient’s benefits, preoperative chemoradiotherapy has become popular for selected patients with advanced (T3, T4 tumors or node-positive) rectal cancer. However, meta-analyses published this year reporting data from recent phase 3 trials raise concerns on the clinical utility of this neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy [1, 2]. Preoperative tumor responsiveness to this treatment was approximately 40–50 %, and the overall resistance and complications rates balanced with the benefits. These latest clinical results reveal the urgent need of biomedical research for developing robust biomarkers for tailoring neoadjuvant treatment to sensitive tumors only and explain the recent focus of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based biomarkers [3, 4]. Although ideally laparoscopic rectal surgery should follow neoadjuvant treatment in selected patients with predictable tumor responsiveness, it is important to obtain data evaluating the impact of this preoperative multimodal treatment in the safety and efficacy of subsequent laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, either using conventional or novel genome-based selection criteria this information is important for laparoscopic surgeons. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fleming FJ, Påhlman L, Monson JR (2011) Neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54(7):901–912PubMedCrossRef Fleming FJ, Påhlman L, Monson JR (2011) Neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54(7):901–912PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hawkes EA, Cunningham D, Tait D, Brown G, Chau I (2011) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for early-stage rectal cancer: an evolving paradigm? Semin Radiat Oncol 21(3):196–202PubMedCrossRef Hawkes EA, Cunningham D, Tait D, Brown G, Chau I (2011) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for early-stage rectal cancer: an evolving paradigm? Semin Radiat Oncol 21(3):196–202PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2010) Next-generation sequencing and epigenome technologies: potential medical applications. Expert Rev Med Devices 7(6):723–726PubMedCrossRef Roukos DH (2010) Next-generation sequencing and epigenome technologies: potential medical applications. Expert Rev Med Devices 7(6):723–726PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Roukos DH, Katsios C, Liakakos T (2010) Genotype-phenotype map and molecular networks: a promising solution in overcoming colorectal cancer resistance to targeted treatment. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 10(5):541–545PubMedCrossRef Roukos DH, Katsios C, Liakakos T (2010) Genotype-phenotype map and molecular networks: a promising solution in overcoming colorectal cancer resistance to targeted treatment. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 10(5):541–545PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Denost Q, Laurent C, Paumet T, Quintane L, Martenot M, Rullier E (2012) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: preoperative radiochemotherapy versus surgery alone. Surg Endosc 26(7):1878–1883PubMedCrossRef Denost Q, Laurent C, Paumet T, Quintane L, Martenot M, Rullier E (2012) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: preoperative radiochemotherapy versus surgery alone. Surg Endosc 26(7):1878–1883PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Katsios GC, Baltogiannis G, Roukos DH (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: comparative-effectiveness research and future trends. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 10(4):473–476PubMedCrossRef Katsios GC, Baltogiannis G, Roukos DH (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: comparative-effectiveness research and future trends. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 10(4):473–476PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Liakakos T, Roukos D (2008) Laparoscopic gastrectomy: advances enable wide clinical application. Surg Endosc 22(6):1553–1555PubMedCrossRef Liakakos T, Roukos D (2008) Laparoscopic gastrectomy: advances enable wide clinical application. Surg Endosc 22(6):1553–1555PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Liakakos T, Roukos DH (2009) Randomized evidence for laparoscopic gastrectomy short-term quality of life improvement and challenges for improving long-term outcomes. Ann Surg 250(2):349–350PubMedCrossRef Liakakos T, Roukos DH (2009) Randomized evidence for laparoscopic gastrectomy short-term quality of life improvement and challenges for improving long-term outcomes. Ann Surg 250(2):349–350PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2009) Laparoscopic gastrectomy and personal genomics: high-volume surgeons and predictive biomedicine may govern the future for resectable gastric cancer. Ann Surg 250:650–651PubMedCrossRef Roukos DH (2009) Laparoscopic gastrectomy and personal genomics: high-volume surgeons and predictive biomedicine may govern the future for resectable gastric cancer. Ann Surg 250:650–651PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Liakakos T, Roukos DH (2008) Is there any long-term benefit in quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer? Surg Endosc 22(5):1402–1404PubMedCrossRef Liakakos T, Roukos DH (2008) Is there any long-term benefit in quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer? Surg Endosc 22(5):1402–1404PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ziogas D, Polychronidis A, Kanellos I, Roukos D (2009) Laparoscopic colectomy survival benefit for colon cancer: is evidence from a randomized trial true? Ann Surg 249(4):695–696PubMedCrossRef Ziogas D, Polychronidis A, Kanellos I, Roukos D (2009) Laparoscopic colectomy survival benefit for colon cancer: is evidence from a randomized trial true? Ann Surg 249(4):695–696PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ziogas D, Roukos D (2008) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: may it improve also survival? Surg Endosc 22(5):1405–1406PubMedCrossRef Ziogas D, Roukos D (2008) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: may it improve also survival? Surg Endosc 22(5):1405–1406PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nikiteas N, Roukos D, Kouraklis G (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery: perspectives for tailoring an optimal surgical option. Expert Rev Med Devices 8(3):295–298PubMedCrossRef Nikiteas N, Roukos D, Kouraklis G (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery: perspectives for tailoring an optimal surgical option. Expert Rev Med Devices 8(3):295–298PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Maughan TS, Adams RA, Smith CG, Meade AM, Seymour MT, Wilson RH, Idziaszczyk S, Harris R, Fisher D, Kenny SL, Kay E, Mitchell JK, Madi A, Jasani B, James MD, Bridgewater J, Kennedy MJ, Claes B, Lambrechts D, Kaplan R, Cheadle JP, MRC COIN Trial Investigators (2011) Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet 377(9783):2103–2114PubMedCrossRef Maughan TS, Adams RA, Smith CG, Meade AM, Seymour MT, Wilson RH, Idziaszczyk S, Harris R, Fisher D, Kenny SL, Kay E, Mitchell JK, Madi A, Jasani B, James MD, Bridgewater J, Kennedy MJ, Claes B, Lambrechts D, Kaplan R, Cheadle JP, MRC COIN Trial Investigators (2011) Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet 377(9783):2103–2114PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Alberts SR, Sargent DJ, Nair S, Mahoney MR, Mooney M, Thibodeau SN, Smyrk TC, Sinicrope FA, Chan E, Gill S, Kahlenberg MS, Shields AF, Quesenberry JT, Webb TA, Farr GH Jr, Pockaj BA, Grothey A, Goldberg RM (2012) Effect of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with or without cetuximab on survival among patients with resected stage III colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 307(13):1383–1393PubMedCrossRef Alberts SR, Sargent DJ, Nair S, Mahoney MR, Mooney M, Thibodeau SN, Smyrk TC, Sinicrope FA, Chan E, Gill S, Kahlenberg MS, Shields AF, Quesenberry JT, Webb TA, Farr GH Jr, Pockaj BA, Grothey A, Goldberg RM (2012) Effect of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with or without cetuximab on survival among patients with resected stage III colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 307(13):1383–1393PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Katsios C, Roukos DH (2010) Individual genomes and personalized medicine: life diversity and complexity. Pers Med 7(4):347–350CrossRef Katsios C, Roukos DH (2010) Individual genomes and personalized medicine: life diversity and complexity. Pers Med 7(4):347–350CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2010) Next-generation, genome sequencing-based biomarkers: concerns and challenges for medical practice. Biomark Med 4(4):583–586PubMedCrossRef Roukos DH (2010) Next-generation, genome sequencing-based biomarkers: concerns and challenges for medical practice. Biomark Med 4(4):583–586PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2010) Complete genome sequencing and network modeling to overcome trastuzumab resistance. Pharmacogenomics 11(8):1039–1043 Roukos DH (2010) Complete genome sequencing and network modeling to overcome trastuzumab resistance. Pharmacogenomics 11(8):1039–1043
19.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2011) Trastuzumab and beyond: sequencing cancer genomes and predicting molecular networks. Pharmacogenomics J 11(2):81–92 Roukos DH (2011) Trastuzumab and beyond: sequencing cancer genomes and predicting molecular networks. Pharmacogenomics J 11(2):81–92
20.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2011) Cancer genome explosion and systems biology: impact on surgical oncology? Ann Surg Oncol 18(1):12–15 Roukos DH (2011) Cancer genome explosion and systems biology: impact on surgical oncology? Ann Surg Oncol 18(1):12–15
21.
go back to reference Fatouros M, Roukos DH, Arampatzis I, Sotiriadis A, Paraskevaidis E, Kappas AM (2005) Factors increasing local recurrence in breast-conserving surgery. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 5(4):737–745 Fatouros M, Roukos DH, Arampatzis I, Sotiriadis A, Paraskevaidis E, Kappas AM (2005) Factors increasing local recurrence in breast-conserving surgery. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 5(4):737–745
22.
go back to reference Ziogas D, Baltogiannis G, Fatouros M, Roukos DH (2008) Identifying and preventing high-risk gastric cancer individuals with CDH1 mutations. Ann Surg 247(4):714–715 Ziogas D, Baltogiannis G, Fatouros M, Roukos DH (2008) Identifying and preventing high-risk gastric cancer individuals with CDH1 mutations. Ann Surg 247(4):714–715
23.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2011) Networks medicine: from reductionism to evidence of complex dynamic biomolecular interactions. Pharmacogenomics 12(5):695–698 Roukos DH (2011) Networks medicine: from reductionism to evidence of complex dynamic biomolecular interactions. Pharmacogenomics 12(5):695–698
24.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2011) Measurable evidence of miRNAs as regulators of cancer networks and therapeutic targets. Expert Rev Med Devices 8(2):123–126 Roukos DH (2011) Measurable evidence of miRNAs as regulators of cancer networks and therapeutic targets. Expert Rev Med Devices 8(2):123–126
25.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2011) “Big” Science: genome regulatory networks and novel molecular tools to improve health. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 11(2):123–126 Roukos DH (2011) “Big” Science: genome regulatory networks and novel molecular tools to improve health. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 11(2):123–126
26.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2010) Beyond HER2 and trastuzumab: heterogeneity, systems biology, and cancer origin research may guide the future for personalized treatment of very early but aggressive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(17):e279–e280; author reply e282–e283 Roukos DH (2010) Beyond HER2 and trastuzumab: heterogeneity, systems biology, and cancer origin research may guide the future for personalized treatment of very early but aggressive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(17):e279–e280; author reply e282–e283
27.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2011) Translating epigenetics into an anticancer drug pipeline for solid tumors. Expert Rev Med Devices 8(4):409–413 Roukos DH (2011) Translating epigenetics into an anticancer drug pipeline for solid tumors. Expert Rev Med Devices 8(4):409–413
28.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2011) Chromatin: a key player in complex gene regulation and future cancer therapeutics. Epigenomics 3(4):395–399 Roukos DH (2011) Chromatin: a key player in complex gene regulation and future cancer therapeutics. Epigenomics 3(4):395–399
29.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2012) Spatiotemporal individual genome code-lifestyle network: revolutionizing personal diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 9(3):215–218 Roukos DH (2012) Spatiotemporal individual genome code-lifestyle network: revolutionizing personal diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 9(3):215–218
30.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2012) Differential signalling transduction networks for clinical robustness. Expert Rev Proteomics 9(2):111–114 Roukos DH (2012) Differential signalling transduction networks for clinical robustness. Expert Rev Proteomics 9(2):111–114
31.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2012) Biotechnological, genomics and systems-synthetic biology revolution: redesigning genetic code for a pragmatic systems medicine. Expert Rev Med Devices 9(2):97–101 Roukos DH (2012) Biotechnological, genomics and systems-synthetic biology revolution: redesigning genetic code for a pragmatic systems medicine. Expert Rev Med Devices 9(2):97–101
32.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2012) Disrupting cancer cells’ biocircuits with interactomebased drugs: is ‘clinical’ innovation realistic? Expert Rev Proteomics 9(4):349–353 Roukos DH (2012) Disrupting cancer cells’ biocircuits with interactomebased drugs: is ‘clinical’ innovation realistic? Expert Rev Proteomics 9(4):349–353
Metadata
Title
Next-generation, genome- and mutational landscape heterogeneity-based novel biomarkers for personalized neoadjuvant treatment and laparoscopic rectal cancer resection
Author
Christof Hottenrott
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2570-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2013 Go to the issue