Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Endoluminal Surgery

New experience of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasms

Authors: Shuling Li, Zikai Wang, Fengchun Cai, Enqiang Linghu, Gang Sun, Xiangdong Wang, Jiangyun Meng, Hong Du, Yunsheng Yang, Wen Li

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

To establish the clinical value of endoscopic papillectomy for duodenal papillary tumor based on endoscopic and clinical characteristics.

Patients and methods

This single-center, retrospective study included 110 patients with duodenal papillary tumor who underwent endoscopic papillectomy between January 2006 and April 2017 at the gastrointestinal endoscopic center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital. Clinical data, postoperative pathology, procedure-related complications, and therapeutic outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Endoscopic papillectomy was technically feasible in all patients, and was mainly performed by four experienced endoscopists. The primary success rate of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasms was 78.2%. A total of 13 patients experienced recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 16.28 months (range 6–132 months), the predictive factors that were related to recurrence were complete resection (53.8% vs. 94.2%; P = 0.001), and final pathology findings (P = 0.001). Delayed hemorrhage, the most common procedure-related complication, occurred in 20% (22/110) of patients and was significantly related to intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.042). Pancreatitis was the second most common complication, which was closely related to intraoperative bleeding requiring intervention (P = 0.040) and larger tumor size (P = 0.044). Histology, type of resection, stent placement, sphincterotomy, and duration of procedure were not related to post-procedure hemorrhage or pancreatitis. Older age (63.7 ± 13.5 vs. 57.4 ± 12.2; P = 0.033), jaundice (47.8% vs. 13.8%; P = 0.001), endoscopic forceps biopsy diagnosis of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (82.6% vs. 14.9%; P = 0.001), tumor size ≥ 2 cm (60.9% vs. 34.5%; P = 0.022), and dilation of the bile duct (34.8% vs. 9.2%; P = 0.006) were clinical features for ampullary carcinoma. The rate of complete resection (52.2% vs. 92.0%; P = 0.001) and recurrence (34.8% vs. 6.8%; P = 0.001) were also related to the diagnosis of ampullary carcinoma at final pathology.

Conclusions

Endoscopic papillectomy is a feasible and reasonable option for both diagnosis and treatment of tumors of the duodenal papilla in properly selected patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Park SW, Song SY, Chung JB et al (2000) Endoscopic snare resection for tumors of the ampulla of Vater. Yonsei Med J 41(2):213–218CrossRefPubMed Park SW, Song SY, Chung JB et al (2000) Endoscopic snare resection for tumors of the ampulla of Vater. Yonsei Med J 41(2):213–218CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jung MK, Cho CM, Park SY et al (2009) Endoscopic resection of ampullary neoplasms: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 23(11):2568–2574CrossRefPubMed Jung MK, Cho CM, Park SY et al (2009) Endoscopic resection of ampullary neoplasms: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 23(11):2568–2574CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Stolte M, Pscherer C (1996) Adenoma-carcinoma sequence in the papilla of Vater. Scand J Gastroenterol 31(4):376–382CrossRefPubMed Stolte M, Pscherer C (1996) Adenoma-carcinoma sequence in the papilla of Vater. Scand J Gastroenterol 31(4):376–382CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Di Giorgio A, Alfieri S, Rotondi F et al (2005) Pancreatoduodenectomy for tumors of Vater’s ampulla: report on 94 consecutive patients. World J Surg 29(4):513–518CrossRefPubMed Di Giorgio A, Alfieri S, Rotondi F et al (2005) Pancreatoduodenectomy for tumors of Vater’s ampulla: report on 94 consecutive patients. World J Surg 29(4):513–518CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226(3):248–257 (discussion 257–260)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226(3):248–257 (discussion 257–260)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Tran TC, Vitale GC (2004) Ampullary tumors: endoscopic versus operative management. Surg Innov 11(4):255–263CrossRefPubMed Tran TC, Vitale GC (2004) Ampullary tumors: endoscopic versus operative management. Surg Innov 11(4):255–263CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dubois M, Labgaa I, Dorta G et al (2017) Endoscopic and surgical ampullectomy for non-invasive ampullary tumors: short-term outcomes. Biosci Trends 10(6):507–511CrossRefPubMed Dubois M, Labgaa I, Dorta G et al (2017) Endoscopic and surgical ampullectomy for non-invasive ampullary tumors: short-term outcomes. Biosci Trends 10(6):507–511CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ismail S, Marianne U, Heikki J et al (2014) Endoscopic papillectomy, single-centre experience. Surg Endosc 28(11):3234–3239CrossRefPubMed Ismail S, Marianne U, Heikki J et al (2014) Endoscopic papillectomy, single-centre experience. Surg Endosc 28(11):3234–3239CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bellizzi AM, Kahaleh M, Stelow EB (2009) The assessment of specimens procured by endoscopic ampullectomy. Am J Clin Pathol 132(4):506–513CrossRefPubMed Bellizzi AM, Kahaleh M, Stelow EB (2009) The assessment of specimens procured by endoscopic ampullectomy. Am J Clin Pathol 132(4):506–513CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kimchi NA, Mindrul V, Broide E et al. (1998) The contribution of endoscopy and biopsy to the diagnosis of periampullary tumors. Endoscopy 30(6):538–543CrossRefPubMed Kimchi NA, Mindrul V, Broide E et al. (1998) The contribution of endoscopy and biopsy to the diagnosis of periampullary tumors. Endoscopy 30(6):538–543CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Yamaguchi K, Enjoji M, Kitamura K (1990) Endoscopic biopsy has limited accuracy in diagnosis of ampullary tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 36(6):588–592CrossRefPubMed Yamaguchi K, Enjoji M, Kitamura K (1990) Endoscopic biopsy has limited accuracy in diagnosis of ampullary tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 36(6):588–592CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Elek G, Gyori S, Toth B et al (2003) Histological evaluation of preoperative biopsies from ampulla vateri. Pathol Oncol Res 9(1):32–41CrossRefPubMed Elek G, Gyori S, Toth B et al (2003) Histological evaluation of preoperative biopsies from ampulla vateri. Pathol Oncol Res 9(1):32–41CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37(3):383–393CrossRefPubMed Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37(3):383–393CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kim JH, Kim JH, Han JH et al (2009) Is endoscopic papillectomy safe for ampullary adenomas with high-grade dysplasia? Ann Surg Oncol 16(9):2547–2554CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Kim JH, Han JH et al (2009) Is endoscopic papillectomy safe for ampullary adenomas with high-grade dysplasia? Ann Surg Oncol 16(9):2547–2554CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Beger HG, Treitschke F, Gansauge F et al (1999) Tumor of the ampulla of Vater: experience with local or radical resection in 171 consecutively treated patients. Arch Surg 134(5):526–532CrossRefPubMed Beger HG, Treitschke F, Gansauge F et al (1999) Tumor of the ampulla of Vater: experience with local or radical resection in 171 consecutively treated patients. Arch Surg 134(5):526–532CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ahn DW, Ryu JK, Kim J et al (2013) Endoscopic papillectomy for benign ampullary neoplasms: how can treatment outcome be predicted? Gut Liver 7(2):239–245CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahn DW, Ryu JK, Kim J et al (2013) Endoscopic papillectomy for benign ampullary neoplasms: how can treatment outcome be predicted? Gut Liver 7(2):239–245CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Cheng CL, Sherman S, Fogel EL et al (2004) Endoscopic snare papillectomy for tumors of the duodenal papillae. Gastrointest Endosc 60(5):757–764CrossRefPubMed Cheng CL, Sherman S, Fogel EL et al (2004) Endoscopic snare papillectomy for tumors of the duodenal papillae. Gastrointest Endosc 60(5):757–764CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Leclercq P et al (2013) Systematic pancreatic stenting after endoscopic snare papillectomy may reduce the risk of postinterventional pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 27(9):3377–3387CrossRefPubMed Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Leclercq P et al (2013) Systematic pancreatic stenting after endoscopic snare papillectomy may reduce the risk of postinterventional pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 27(9):3377–3387CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Yamao T, Isomoto H, Kohno S et al (2010) Endoscopic snare papillectomy with biliary and pancreatic stent placement for tumors of the major duodenal papilla. Surg Endosc 24(1):119–124CrossRefPubMed Yamao T, Isomoto H, Kohno S et al (2010) Endoscopic snare papillectomy with biliary and pancreatic stent placement for tumors of the major duodenal papilla. Surg Endosc 24(1):119–124CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Harewood GC, Pochron NL, Gostout CJ (2005) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla. Gastrointest Endosc 62(3):367–370CrossRefPubMed Harewood GC, Pochron NL, Gostout CJ (2005) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla. Gastrointest Endosc 62(3):367–370CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
New experience of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasms
Authors
Shuling Li
Zikai Wang
Fengchun Cai
Enqiang Linghu
Gang Sun
Xiangdong Wang
Jiangyun Meng
Hong Du
Yunsheng Yang
Wen Li
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6577-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2019 Go to the issue