Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2009

01-12-2009 | Original Article

New approach to large haemorrhoidal prolapse: double stapled haemorrhoidopexy

Authors: Gabriele Naldini, Jacopo Martellucci, Pasquale Talento, Angelo Caviglia, Luca Moraldi, Mauro Rossi

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 12/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To verify if in large haemorrhoidal prolapse (independently from the degree) in patients with no symptoms of obstructed defaecation syndrome, the use of a stapled hemorrhoidopexy variant, comprising a double stapler haemorrhoidopexy (DSH), makes it possible to reduce the percentage of failures or relapses and to standardise an objective intraoperative parameter for the purpose of quantifying internal prolapses which can then be used as a guide in determining the type of treatment to be provided.

Methods

Between June 2003 and June 2004, 353 patients were treated for haemorrhoidal prolapse. The patients suffering from large haemorrhoidal prolapse occupying more than half of the length of the anal dilator were intraoperatively selected for DSH.

Results

Eighty-three patients (23.5%) underwent a DSH. The degrees of the large haemorrhoidal prolapse intraoperatively selected for DSH were sub-divided as follows: 7.2% (second), 24% (third) and 68.6% (fourth). The follow-up period was 48 months. There were three cases (3.6%) of residual illnesses and five cases (6%) of a relapse. The following complications were recorded: urgency at <3 months (7.2%), haemostasis revisions (2.4%) and spontaneously draining anterior haematoma (1.2%). The results of the 270 haemorrhoidal prolapse (38 second degree, 159 third degree and 130 fourth degree) treated with the procedure for prolapse and haemorrhoids were: nine (3.3%) residual illness and 12 (4.44%) relapse illness. The following complications were recorded: urgency at <3 months (6.6%), haemostasis revisions (2.5%) and spontaneously draining anterior haematoma (0.7%).

Conclusions

The intraoperative selection criterion was both efficacious and reproducible. This variant technique, which can be used in large haemorrhoidal prolapses, could allow us to further improve the quality of treatment for haemorrhoidal conditions using stapled haemorrhoidopexy, without increasing the complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome
2.
go back to reference Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:782–785CrossRefPubMed Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:782–785CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–781CrossRefPubMed Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–781CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C et al (2000) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness: randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1666–1675CrossRefPubMed Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C et al (2000) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness: randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1666–1675CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M et al (2001) Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 182:64–68CrossRefPubMed Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M et al (2001) Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 182:64–68CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, Seow-Choen F (2001) Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 3:175–178CrossRefPubMed Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, Seow-Choen F (2001) Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 3:175–178CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674CrossRefPubMed Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pavlidis T, Papaziogas B, Souparis A, Patsas A, Koutelidakis I, Papaziogas T (2002) Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 17:50–53CrossRefPubMed Pavlidis T, Papaziogas B, Souparis A, Patsas A, Koutelidakis I, Papaziogas T (2002) Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 17:50–53CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1049–1053CrossRefPubMed Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1049–1053CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA (2002) Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1437–1444CrossRefPubMed Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA (2002) Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1437–1444CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregón L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S (2002) Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1367–1374CrossRefPubMed Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregón L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S (2002) Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1367–1374CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien PA (2002) Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 137:337–340CrossRefPubMed Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien PA (2002) Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 137:337–340CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Goulimaris I, Kanellos I, Christoforidis E, Mantzoros I, Ch O, Betsis D (2002) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy compared with Milligan-Morgan excision for the treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 168:6215CrossRef Goulimaris I, Kanellos I, Christoforidis E, Mantzoros I, Ch O, Betsis D (2002) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy compared with Milligan-Morgan excision for the treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 168:6215CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P (2002) Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 89:1376–1381CrossRefPubMed Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P (2002) Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 89:1376–1381CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (2003) A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 46:491–497CrossRefPubMed Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (2003) A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 46:491–497CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I (2003) Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 46:93–99CrossRefPubMed Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I (2003) Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 46:93–99CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Krska Z, Kvasnièka J, Faltyn J et al (2003) Surgical treatment of haemorrhoids according to Longo and Milligan Morgan: an evaluation of postoperative tissue response. Colorectal Dis 5:573–576CrossRefPubMed Krska Z, Kvasnièka J, Faltyn J et al (2003) Surgical treatment of haemorrhoids according to Longo and Milligan Morgan: an evaluation of postoperative tissue response. Colorectal Dis 5:573–576CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Monson JR (2003) Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361:1437–1438CrossRefPubMed Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Monson JR (2003) Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361:1437–1438CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, Lombardi A, Bambini C, Renda A (2003) Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 27:203–207PubMed Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, Lombardi A, Bambini C, Renda A (2003) Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 27:203–207PubMed
20.
go back to reference Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemingway DM (2004) Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs conventional haemorrhoidectomy; a three and a half year follow up. Colorectal Dis 6:37–38CrossRefPubMed Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemingway DM (2004) Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs conventional haemorrhoidectomy; a three and a half year follow up. Colorectal Dis 6:37–38CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A, Bottini C, Caviglia A, Carriero A, Mascagni D, Mauri R, Sofo L, Landolfi V (2004) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1285–1297CrossRefPubMed Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A, Bottini C, Caviglia A, Carriero A, Mascagni D, Mauri R, Sofo L, Landolfi V (2004) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1285–1297CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Naldini G, Martellucci J, Moraldi L, Romano N, Rossi M (2009) Is simple mucosal resection really possible? Considerations about histological findings after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:537–541CrossRefPubMed Naldini G, Martellucci J, Moraldi L, Romano N, Rossi M (2009) Is simple mucosal resection really possible? Considerations about histological findings after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:537–541CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
New approach to large haemorrhoidal prolapse: double stapled haemorrhoidopexy
Authors
Gabriele Naldini
Jacopo Martellucci
Pasquale Talento
Angelo Caviglia
Luca Moraldi
Mauro Rossi
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 12/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0750-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2009

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2009 Go to the issue