Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2006

01-09-2006 | Original Article

Neutropenic event risk and impaired chemotherapy delivery in six European audits of breast cancer treatment

Authors: Matthias Schwenkglenks, Christian Jackisch, Manuel Constenla, Joseph N. Kerger, Robert Paridaens, Leo Auerbach, André Bosly, Ruth Pettengell, Thomas D. Szucs, Robert Leonard

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 9/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Goals of work

The aims of this study were to assess chemotherapy treatment characteristics, neutropenic event (NE) occurrence and related risk factors in breast cancer patients in Western Europe.

Materials and methods

Six retrospective audits of breast cancer chemotherapy were combined into a dataset of 2,860 individuals. NEs were defined as neutropenia-related hospitalisation, dose reduction ≥15% or dose delay ≥7 days. Summation dose intensity (SDI) was calculated to compare different types of chemotherapy regimens on a single scale. Risk factors of NE occurrence and of low relative dose intensity (RDI) ≤85% were identified by multiple logistic regression.

Main results

Patient populations were comparable between audits. Until 1998, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil regimens were most frequently used, but thereafter, anthracycline-based regimens were most common. NEs occurred in 20% of the patients and low RDI in 16%. NE occurrence predicted low RDI and was associated with higher age, bigger body surface area, lower body mass index, regimen type, more chemotherapy cycles planned, normal to high SDI, concomitant radiotherapy and year of treatment. First cycle NE occurrence predicted NEs from cycle 2 onwards. A risk score using age, SDI, number of planned chemotherapy cycles and concomitant radiotherapy differentiated patients with increasing NE risk (9–37%). An alternative score version not using concomitant radiotherapy performed moderately less well.

Conclusions

NEs occurred frequently in this combined dataset and they affected treatment delivery. Identifying patients at high NE risk enables targeted prophylaxis and may avoid dose limitations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Balducci L (2003) Myelosuppression and its consequences in elderly patients with cancer. Oncology (Huntingt) 17:27–32 Balducci L (2003) Myelosuppression and its consequences in elderly patients with cancer. Oncology (Huntingt) 17:27–32
2.
go back to reference Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Moliterni A, Zambetti M, Brambilla C (1995) Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med 332:901–906PubMedCrossRef Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Moliterni A, Zambetti M, Brambilla C (1995) Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med 332:901–906PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Budman DR, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT et al (1998) Dose and dose intensity as determinants of outcome in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1205–1211PubMedCrossRef Budman DR, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT et al (1998) Dose and dose intensity as determinants of outcome in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1205–1211PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chang J (2000) Chemotherapy dose reduction and delay in clinical practice: evaluating the risk to patient outcome in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 36(Suppl 1):S11–S14PubMedCrossRef Chang J (2000) Chemotherapy dose reduction and delay in clinical practice: evaluating the risk to patient outcome in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 36(Suppl 1):S11–S14PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C et al (2003) Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 21:1431–1439PubMedCrossRef Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C et al (2003) Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 21:1431–1439PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Constenla M, Bosly A, Jackisch C et al (2003) An audit of primary breast cancer management in Spain: the OSQAR study [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:312 Constenla M, Bosly A, Jackisch C et al (2003) An audit of primary breast cancer management in Spain: the OSQAR study [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:312
7.
go back to reference Crawford J, Ozer H, Stoller R et al (1991) Reduction by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor of fever and neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 325:164–170PubMedCrossRef Crawford J, Ozer H, Stoller R et al (1991) Reduction by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor of fever and neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 325:164–170PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dale DC, Crawford J, Lyman CG (2001) Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and associated complications in randomized clinical trials: an evidence-based review [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20:1638 Dale DC, Crawford J, Lyman CG (2001) Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and associated complications in randomized clinical trials: an evidence-based review [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20:1638
9.
go back to reference Dale DC (2002) Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients. Drugs 62(Suppl 1):1–15PubMedCrossRef Dale DC (2002) Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients. Drugs 62(Suppl 1):1–15PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1998) Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 352:930–942CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1998) Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 352:930–942CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ellis GK, Livingston RB, Gralow JR, Green SJ, Thompson T (2002) Dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3637–3643PubMedCrossRef Ellis GK, Livingston RB, Gralow JR, Green SJ, Thompson T (2002) Dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3637–3643PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Engelsman E, Klijn JC, Rubens RD et al (1991) “Classical” CMF versus a 3-weekly intravenous CMF schedule in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. An EORTC Breast Cancer Co-operative Group Phase III Trial (10808). Eur J Cancer 27:966–970PubMedCrossRef Engelsman E, Klijn JC, Rubens RD et al (1991) “Classical” CMF versus a 3-weekly intravenous CMF schedule in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. An EORTC Breast Cancer Co-operative Group Phase III Trial (10808). Eur J Cancer 27:966–970PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference ESMO Guidelines Task Force (2001) ESMO recommendations for the application of haematopoietic growth factors (hGFs). Ann Oncol 12:1219–1220CrossRef ESMO Guidelines Task Force (2001) ESMO recommendations for the application of haematopoietic growth factors (hGFs). Ann Oncol 12:1219–1220CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hryniuk W, Frei E 3rd, Wright FA (1998) A single scale for comparing dose-intensity of all chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer: summation dose-intensity. J Clin Oncol 16:3137–3147PubMed Hryniuk W, Frei E 3rd, Wright FA (1998) A single scale for comparing dose-intensity of all chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer: summation dose-intensity. J Clin Oncol 16:3137–3147PubMed
15.
go back to reference Jackisch C, Jaber M, Burkamp U et al (2003) Maintenance of dose intensity in adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer in patients treated outside a clinical trial. Results of a retrospective study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 63:333–343CrossRef Jackisch C, Jaber M, Burkamp U et al (2003) Maintenance of dose intensity in adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer in patients treated outside a clinical trial. Results of a retrospective study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 63:333–343CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kerger JN, Bormans V, Dauwe M (2002) Adjuvant (adj) chemotherapy (CT) delivery in patients (pts) with breast cancer (BC): results from the Chemodose Working Party Belgium–Luxembourg [abstract]. Ann Oncol 13(Suppl 5):38 Kerger JN, Bormans V, Dauwe M (2002) Adjuvant (adj) chemotherapy (CT) delivery in patients (pts) with breast cancer (BC): results from the Chemodose Working Party Belgium–Luxembourg [abstract]. Ann Oncol 13(Suppl 5):38
17.
go back to reference Leonard RC, Miles D, Thomas R, Nussey F (2003) Impact of neutropenia on delivering planned adjuvant chemotherapy: UK audit of primary breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 89:2062–2068PubMedCrossRef Leonard RC, Miles D, Thomas R, Nussey F (2003) Impact of neutropenia on delivering planned adjuvant chemotherapy: UK audit of primary breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 89:2062–2068PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Link BK, Budd GT, Scott S et al (2001) Delivering adjuvant chemotherapy to women with early-stage breast carcinoma: current patterns of care. Cancer 92:1354–1367PubMedCrossRef Link BK, Budd GT, Scott S et al (2001) Delivering adjuvant chemotherapy to women with early-stage breast carcinoma: current patterns of care. Cancer 92:1354–1367PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lyman GH (2003) Risk assessment in oncology clinical practice. From risk factors to risk models. Oncology (Huntingt) 17:8–13 Lyman GH (2003) Risk assessment in oncology clinical practice. From risk factors to risk models. Oncology (Huntingt) 17:8–13
20.
go back to reference Lyman GH, Dale DC, Crawford J (2003) Incidence and predictors of low dose-intensity in adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: a nationwide study of community practices. J Clin Oncol 21:4524–4531PubMedCrossRef Lyman GH, Dale DC, Crawford J (2003) Incidence and predictors of low dose-intensity in adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: a nationwide study of community practices. J Clin Oncol 21:4524–4531PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ozer H, Armitage JO, Bennett CL et al (2000) 2000 update of recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology Growth Factors Expert Panel. J Clin Oncol 18:3558–3585PubMed Ozer H, Armitage JO, Bennett CL et al (2000) 2000 update of recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology Growth Factors Expert Panel. J Clin Oncol 18:3558–3585PubMed
23.
go back to reference Piccart MJ, Biganzoli L, Di Leo A (2000) The impact of chemotherapy dose density and dose intensity on breast cancer outcome: what have we learned? Eur J Cancer 36(Suppl 1):S4–S10PubMedCrossRef Piccart MJ, Biganzoli L, Di Leo A (2000) The impact of chemotherapy dose density and dose intensity on breast cancer outcome: what have we learned? Eur J Cancer 36(Suppl 1):S4–S10PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rogers WH (1993) Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Tech Bull 13:19–23 Rogers WH (1993) Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Tech Bull 13:19–23
25.
go back to reference Silber JH, Fridman M, DiPaola RS et al (1998) First-cycle blood counts and subsequent neutropenia, dose reduction, or delay in early-stage breast cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol 16:2392–2400PubMed Silber JH, Fridman M, DiPaola RS et al (1998) First-cycle blood counts and subsequent neutropenia, dose reduction, or delay in early-stage breast cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol 16:2392–2400PubMed
26.
go back to reference Talcott JA, Siegel RD, Finberg R, Goldman L (1992) Risk assessment in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia: a prospective, two-center validation of a prediction rule. J Clin Oncol 10:316–322PubMed Talcott JA, Siegel RD, Finberg R, Goldman L (1992) Risk assessment in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia: a prospective, two-center validation of a prediction rule. J Clin Oncol 10:316–322PubMed
27.
go back to reference Thatcher N, Girling DJ, Hopwood P et al (2000) Improving survival without reducing quality of life in small-cell lung cancer patients by increasing the dose-intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support: results of a British Medical Research Council Multicenter Randomized Trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. J Clin Oncol 18:395–404PubMed Thatcher N, Girling DJ, Hopwood P et al (2000) Improving survival without reducing quality of life in small-cell lung cancer patients by increasing the dose-intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support: results of a British Medical Research Council Multicenter Randomized Trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. J Clin Oncol 18:395–404PubMed
Metadata
Title
Neutropenic event risk and impaired chemotherapy delivery in six European audits of breast cancer treatment
Authors
Matthias Schwenkglenks
Christian Jackisch
Manuel Constenla
Joseph N. Kerger
Robert Paridaens
Leo Auerbach
André Bosly
Ruth Pettengell
Thomas D. Szucs
Robert Leonard
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 9/2006
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0034-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2006

Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2006 Go to the issue

Forthcoming Meetings

Forthcoming meetings

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine