Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2019

01-07-2019 | Neurofibromatosis | Clinical Study

First report of quality of life in adults with neurofibromatosis 2 who are deafened or have significant hearing loss: results of a live-video randomized control trial

Authors: Christopher J. Funes, Ryan A. Mace, Erik A. Macklin, Scott R. Plotkin, Justin T. Jordan, Ana-Maria Vranceanu

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a mind–body program for patients with neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) who are deaf or have significant hearing loss (d3RP-NF2) against an attention placebo control (dHEP-NF2) in a single-blind randomized control trial. Both were delivered using Communication Access Real-Time Translation and live group videoconferencing.

Methods

Forty-five adults with NF2 were randomized. Co-primary outcomes were physical quality of life (QoL) and psychological QoL and secondary outcomes were social QoL and environmental QoL, all measured with the World Health Organization Quality of Life Abbreviated Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF). Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-treatment, and six-month follow-up.

Results

Forty-one participants (91%) completed the intervention, and 29 (64%) completed the six-month follow up. Participants in the d3RP-NF2 showed significantly greater improvements from baseline to post-treatment on physical QoL (14.79, 95% CI 5.41–24.18; p ≤ 0.001), psychological QoL (18.77, 95% CI 7.09–30.44, p ≤ 0.001), and environmental QoL (13.25, 95% CI 1.10–25.39, p = 0.03) compared to the dHEP-NF2. Social QoL also significantly increased in the d3RP-NF2 (16.32, 95% CI 6.66–25.97, p = 0.001), but improvement was not beyond the dHEP-NF2. Gains in QoL were clinically meaningful and maintained at the 6-month follow-up for d3RP-NF2 participants across all QoL domains. There were more treatment responders in the d3RP-NF2 compared to the dHEP-NF2.

Conclusions

The d3RP-NF2 was well accepted, highly feasible, and resulted in sustained improvements in QoL in patients with NF2 who are deaf or have significant hearing loss.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Merker VL, Bergner AL, Vranceanu A-M et al (2016) Health-related quality of life of individuals with neurofibromatosis type 2: results from the NF2 natural history study. Otol Neurotol 37:574–579CrossRefPubMed Merker VL, Bergner AL, Vranceanu A-M et al (2016) Health-related quality of life of individuals with neurofibromatosis type 2: results from the NF2 natural history study. Otol Neurotol 37:574–579CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Evans DG (1993) Neurofibromatosis 2. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA et al (eds) GeneReviews®. University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle Evans DG (1993) Neurofibromatosis 2. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA et al (eds) GeneReviews®. University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle
5.
go back to reference Wolkenstein P, Zeller J, Revuz J et al (2001) Quality-of-life impairment in neurofibromatosis type 1: a cross-sectional study of 128 cases. Arch Dermatol 137:1421–1425CrossRefPubMed Wolkenstein P, Zeller J, Revuz J et al (2001) Quality-of-life impairment in neurofibromatosis type 1: a cross-sectional study of 128 cases. Arch Dermatol 137:1421–1425CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Vranceanu A-M, Riklin E, Merker VL et al (2016) Mind-body therapy via videoconferencing in patients with neurofibromatosis: an RCT. Neurology 87:806–814CrossRefPubMed Vranceanu A-M, Riklin E, Merker VL et al (2016) Mind-body therapy via videoconferencing in patients with neurofibromatosis: an RCT. Neurology 87:806–814CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA, WHOQOL Group (2004) The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. Qual Life Res 13:299–310CrossRef Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA, WHOQOL Group (2004) The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. Qual Life Res 13:299–310CrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference World Health Organization (1995) Field trial whoqol-100 february 1995: the 100 questions with response scales, 2012 revision World Health Organization (1995) Field trial whoqol-100 february 1995: the 100 questions with response scales, 2012 revision
11.
go back to reference Attkisson C (1996) The client satisfaction questionnaire (csq) scales. In: Outcome assessment in clinical practice. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore Attkisson C (1996) The client satisfaction questionnaire (csq) scales. In: Outcome assessment in clinical practice. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
12.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Browne RH (1995) On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med 14:1933–1940CrossRefPubMed Browne RH (1995) On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med 14:1933–1940CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR (2004) Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 10:307–312CrossRef Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR (2004) Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 10:307–312CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shih WJ, Ohman-Strickland PA, Lin Y (2004) Analysis of pilot and early phase studies with small sample sizes. Stat Med 23:1827–1842CrossRefPubMed Shih WJ, Ohman-Strickland PA, Lin Y (2004) Analysis of pilot and early phase studies with small sample sizes. Stat Med 23:1827–1842CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ (2016) Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res 25:1057–1073CrossRefPubMed Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ (2016) Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res 25:1057–1073CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rounsaville B, Carrol K, Onken L (2001) A stage model of behavioral therapies research: Getting started and moving on from stage I. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 8:133–142CrossRef Rounsaville B, Carrol K, Onken L (2001) A stage model of behavioral therapies research: Getting started and moving on from stage I. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 8:133–142CrossRef
Metadata
Title
First report of quality of life in adults with neurofibromatosis 2 who are deafened or have significant hearing loss: results of a live-video randomized control trial
Authors
Christopher J. Funes
Ryan A. Mace
Erik A. Macklin
Scott R. Plotkin
Justin T. Jordan
Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03182-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2019 Go to the issue