Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2019

01-12-2019 | Neurofibromatosis | Clinical Study

Cultivating resiliency in patients with neurofibromatosis 2 who are deafened or have severe hearing loss: a live‑video randomized control trial

Authors: Jonathan Greenberg, Sarah Carter, Ethan Lester, Christopher J. Funes, Eric A. Macklin, Scott Plotkin, Ana-Maria Vranceanu

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with NF2 who are deaf or have significant hearing loss face numerous and unique challenges which lead to poor quality of life, and thus may benefit from resiliency programs.

Methods

We performed secondary data analyses on a single blind, randomized controlled trial of an 8 week mind–body resiliency program (the Relaxation Response and Resiliency program for Deaf NF2; d3RP-NF2) versus a health education control (Health Enhancement Program for Deaf NF2;dHEP-NF2) which showed improvement in quality of life (Funes in JAMA 2019, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11060-019-03182-3). Here we report on improvements in resiliency factors (i.e. optimism, gratitude, perceived social support, mindfulness, and perceived coping abilities) assessed at baseline, post-test and 6-month follow-up. Both programs were delivered via Skype using Communication Access Real-Time Translation.

Results

Patients who were randomized to the d3RP-NF2 program exhibited significant improvements from baseline to post-program in gratitude (Mdifference = 4.04, 95% CI 1.58–6.50; p = 0.002), perceived social support (Mdifference = 16.36, 95% CI 9.20–23.51; p < 0.001), mindfulness (Mdifference = 4.02, 95% CI 1.10–6.94; p = 0.008), perceived coping (Mdifference = 15.25, 95% CI 10.21–20.28; p < 0.001), and a non-significant trend of improvement in optimism (Mdifference = 1.15, 95% CI −0.14–12.44; p = 0.079). These improvements were all maintained through the 6-month follow up. Improvements in perceived coping (Mdifference = 12.34, 95% CI 4.75–19.93; p = 0.002), social support (Mdifference = 13.11, 95% CI 2.19–24.03; p = 0.02), and gratitude (Mdifference = 4.59, 95% CI 0.83–8.36; p = 0.018) were over and above the changes observed in those randomized to dHEP-NF2.

Conclusion

The d3RP-NF2 sustainably improves multiple dimensions of resiliency. Promoting resiliency may be of utmost importance for this uderserved population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bonanno G, Galea S, Bucciarelli A, Vlahov D (2007) What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress. J Consult Clin Psychol 75(5):671–682CrossRefPubMed Bonanno G, Galea S, Bucciarelli A, Vlahov D (2007) What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress. J Consult Clin Psychol 75(5):671–682CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Browne RH (1995) On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med 14(17):1933–1940CrossRefPubMed Browne RH (1995) On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med 14(17):1933–1940CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fiol CM, O’Connor EJ (2013) In the waking up ! mindfulness face of bandwagons. Acad Manag Rev 28(1):54–70CrossRef Fiol CM, O’Connor EJ (2013) In the waking up ! mindfulness face of bandwagons. Acad Manag Rev 28(1):54–70CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mortel TF (2008) Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Aust J Adv Nurs 25(4):40–48 Mortel TF (2008) Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Aust J Adv Nurs 25(4):40–48
23.
go back to reference Tait L, Birchwood M, Trower P (2004) Adapting to the challenge of psychosis: Personal resilience and the use of sealing-over (avoidant) coping strategies. Br J Psychiatry 185(5):410–415CrossRefPubMed Tait L, Birchwood M, Trower P (2004) Adapting to the challenge of psychosis: Personal resilience and the use of sealing-over (avoidant) coping strategies. Br J Psychiatry 185(5):410–415CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Windle G (2011) What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Rev Clin Gerontol 21(2):152–169CrossRef Windle G (2011) What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Rev Clin Gerontol 21(2):152–169CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cultivating resiliency in patients with neurofibromatosis 2 who are deafened or have severe hearing loss: a live‑video randomized control trial
Authors
Jonathan Greenberg
Sarah Carter
Ethan Lester
Christopher J. Funes
Eric A. Macklin
Scott Plotkin
Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03326-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2019 Go to the issue