Top

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Published in:

01-08-2019 | Research Article

Neural Encoding of Amplitude Modulations in the Human Efferent System

Authors: Srikanta K Mishra, Milan Biswal

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 4/2019

Abstract

Most natural sounds, including speech, exhibit temporal amplitude fluctuations. This information is encoded as amplitude modulations (AM)—essential for auditory and speech perception. The neural representation of AM has been studied at various stages of the ascending auditory system from the auditory nerve to the cortex. In contrast, research on neural coding of AM in the efferent pathway has been extremely limited. The objective of this study was to investigate the encoding of AM signals in the medial olivocochlear system by measuring the modulation transfer functions of the efferent response in humans. A secondary goal was to replicate the controversial findings from the literature that efferent stimulation produces larger effects for the AM elicitor with 100 Hz modulation frequency in comparison with the unmodulated elicitor. The efferent response was quantified by measuring changes in stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission magnitude due to various modulated and unmodulated elicitors. Unmodulated, broadband noise elicitors yielded either slightly larger or similar efferent responses relative to modulated elicitors depending on the modulation frequency. Efferent responses to the unmodulated and modulated elicitors with 100 Hz modulation frequency were not significantly different. The efferent system encoding of AM sounds—modulation transfer functions—can be modeled with a first-order Butterworth low-pass filter with different cutoff frequencies for ipsilateral and contralateral elicitors. The ipsilateral efferent pathway showed a greater sensitivity to AM information comparted to the contralateral pathway. Efferent modulation transfer functions suggest that the ability of the system to follow AM decreases with increasing modulation frequency and that efferents may not be fully operating on the envelope of the speech.

Abdala C, Mishra SK, Williams TL (2009) Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex. J Acoust Soc Am 125:1584–1594. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3068442 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Backus BC (2005) Using stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions to study basic properties of the human medial olivocochlear reflex. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Backus BC, Guinan JJ (2006) Time-course of the human medial olivocochlear reflex. J Acoust Soc Am 119:2889–2904. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2169918 CrossRefPubMed

Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Hurley AE, Wen H, Kemp DT (1995) Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear Res 87:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(95)00082-F CrossRefPubMed

de Boer J, Thornton ARD (2007) Effect of subject task on contralateral suppression of click evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 233:117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2007.08.002 CrossRefPubMed

Boero LE, Castagna VC, Di Guilmi MN et al (2018) Enhancement of the medial olivocochlear system prevents hidden hearing loss. J Neurosci 38:7440–7451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Boothalingam S, Purcell D, Scollie S (2014) Influence of 100Hz amplitude modulation on the human medial olivocochlear reflex. Neurosci Lett 580:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.07.048 CrossRefPubMed

Boothalingam S, Macpherson E, Allan C, Allen P, Purcell D (2016) Localization-in-noise and binaural medial olivocochlear functioning in children and young adults. J Acoust Soc Am 139:247–262. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4939708 CrossRefPubMed

Carney LH (2018) Supra-threshold hearing and fluctuation profiles: implications for sensorineural and hidden hearing loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 19:331–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-018-0669-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Clark NR, Brown GJ, Jürgens T, Meddis R (2012) A frequency-selective feedback model of auditory efferent suppression and its implications for the recognition of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 132:1535–1541. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4742745 CrossRefPubMed

Drullman R, Festen JM, Plomp R (1994) Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. J Acoust Soc Am 95:1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408467 CrossRefPubMed

Drullman R, Festen JM, Houtgast T (1996) Effect of temporal modulation reduction on spectral contrasts in speech. J Acoust Soc Am 99:2358–2364. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.415423 CrossRefPubMed

Elliott TM, Theunissen FE (2009) The modulation transfer function for speech intelligibility. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000302 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ferrari SLP, Cribari-Neto F (2004) Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. J Appl Stat 35:799–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000214501 CrossRef

Giraud AL, Poeppel D (2012) Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nat Neurosci 15:511–517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3063 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Giraud A, Lorenzi C, Ashburner J et al (2000) Representation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain. J Neurophysiol 84:1588–1598. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/11.3.183 CrossRefPubMed

Greenberg S, Arai T (2001) The relation between speech intelligibility and the complex modulation spectrum. Proc Eur Conf Speech Commun Technol:473–476

Greenberg S, Hollenback J, Ellis D (1996) Insights into spoken language gleaned from phonetic transcription of the switchboard corpus. Int Conf Spok Lang Process:S32–S35

Guinan JJ, Backus BC, Lilaonitkul W, Aharonson V (2003) Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 4:521–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-002-3037-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gummer M, Yates GK, Johnstone BM (1988) Modulation transfer function of efferent neurones in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 36:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(88)90136-0 CrossRefPubMed

Henin S, Thompson S, Abdelrazeq S, Long GR (2011) Changes in amplitude and phase of distortion-product otoacoustic emission fine-structure and separated components during efferent activation. J Acoust Soc Am 129:2068–2079. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3543945 CrossRefPubMed

Houtgast T, Steeneken HJM (1985) A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria. J Acoust Soc Am 77:1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392224 CrossRef

Johnson TA, Beshaler L (2013) Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 134:1121–1133. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4812766 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Joris PX, Schreiner CE, Rees A (2004) Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. Physiol Rev 84:541–577. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00029.2003 CrossRefPubMed

Timpe-Syverson GK, Decker TN (1999) Attention effects on distortion- product otoacoustic emissions with contralateral speech stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol 10:371–378

Kalaiah MK, Nanchirakal JF, Kharmawphlang L, Noronah SC (2017) Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for various noise signals. Hear Balanc Commun 15:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2017.1311504 CrossRef

Kanedera N, Arai T, Hermansky H, Pavel M (1997) On the importance of various modulation frequencies for speech recognition. Proc Eurospeech:1079–1082

Kim DO, Dorn PA, Neely ST, Gorga MP (2001) Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101620010066 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kirk EC, Smith DW (2003) Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 4:445–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-002-3013-y CrossRef

Lilaonitkul W, Guinan JJ (2009a) Reflex control of the human inner ear : a half-octave offset in medial efferent feedback that is consistent with an efferent role in the control of masking. J Neurophysiol 101:1394–1406. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.90925.2008 CrossRefPubMed

Lilaonitkul W, Guinan JJ (2009b) Human medial olivocochlear reflex: effects as functions of contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitor bandwidths. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10:459–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-009-0163-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Long GR, Talmadge CL, Lee J (2008) Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries. J Acoust Soc Am 124:1613–1626. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2949505 CrossRefPubMed

Lopez-Poveda EA (2018) Olivocochlear efferents in animals and humans: from anatomy to clinical relevance. Front Neurol 9:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00197 CrossRef

Maison S, Micheyl C, Collet L (1997) Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones. J Neurophysiol 77:1759–1768CrossRefPubMed

Maison S, Micheyl C, Collet L (1999) Sinusoidal amplitude modulation alters contralateral noise suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Neuroscience 91:133–138CrossRefPubMed

Maison S, Durrant J, Gallineau C et al (2001) Delay and temporal integration in medial olivocochlear bundle activation in humans. Ear Hear 22:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200102000-00007 CrossRefPubMed

Mertes IB (2018) Human medial efferent activity elicited by dynamic versus static contralateral noises. Hear Res 365:100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.007 CrossRefPubMed

Micheyl C, Maison S, Carlyon RP, Andéol G, Collet L (1999) Contralateral suppression of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions by harmonic complex tones in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 105:293–305. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.424525 CrossRefPubMed

Mishra SK (2014) Attentional modulation of medial olivocochlear inhibition: evidence for immaturity in children. Hear Res 318:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.009 CrossRefPubMed

Mishra SK, Abdala C (2015) Stability of the medial olivocochlear reflex as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Speech, Lang Hear Res 58:122–134. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014 CrossRef

Mishra SK, Talmadge CL (2018) Sweep-tone evoked stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions in humans : development of a noise-rejection algorithm and normative features. Hear Res 358:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.11.006 CrossRef

Moleti A, Sisto R (2016) Localization of the reflection sources of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17:393–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0580-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pickett JM (1999) The acoustics of speech communication: fundamentals, speech perception theory, and technology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA

Picton TW, Skinner CR, Champagne SC, Kellett AJC, Maiste AC (1987) Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am 82:165–178. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395560 CrossRefPubMed

Rosen S (1992) Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 336:367–373. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1992.0070 CrossRef

Shera CA, Guinan JJ (1999) Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 105:782–798. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.426948 CrossRefPubMed

Shera CA, Zweig G (1993) Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 93:3333–3352. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.405717 CrossRefPubMed

Souza NN, Dhar S, Neely ST, Siegel JH (2014) Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels. J Acoust Soc Am 136:1768–1787. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4894787 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Viemeister NF (1979) Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 66:1364–1380CrossRefPubMed

Yeend I, Beach EF, Sharma M, Dillon H (2017) The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise. Hear Res 353:224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.006 CrossRefPubMed

Title: Neural Encoding of Amplitude Modulations in the Human Efferent System
Authors: Srikanta K Mishra
Milan Biswal
Publication date: 01-08-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-019-00720-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Neural Encoding of Amplitude Modulations in the Human Efferent System

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Evaluating Psychophysical Polarity Sensitivity as an Indirect Estimate of Neural Status in Cochlear Implant Listeners

The fMRI Data of Thompson et al. (2006) Do Not Constrain How the Human Midbrain Represents Interaural Time Delay

A Site-Selection Strategy Based on Polarity Sensitivity for Cochlear Implants: Effects on Spectro-Temporal Resolution and Speech Perception

Virtual Rhesus Labyrinth Model Predicts Responses to Electrical Stimulation Delivered by a Vestibular Prosthesis

Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise

AAV-Mediated Neurotrophin Gene Therapy Promotes Improved Survival of Cochlear Spiral Ganglion Neurons in Neonatally Deafened Cats: Comparison of AAV2-hBDNF and AAV5-hGDNF