Skip to main content
Top

05-02-2024 | Nephrostomy | Original Article

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes for Mothers with Symptomatic Hydronephrosis of Pregnancy Managed with Percutaneous Nephrostomy with Comparison High-Risk Pregnancy Group

Authors: Mark Arthur, Joshua Schammel, MD, David Kozminski, MD, Kim Williams, MBA, Paul Feustel, PhD, Christopher Stark, MD, Lawrence Keating, MD, Gary Siskin, MD, Allen Herr, MD, Charles Welliver, MD

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Symptomatic hydronephrosis of pregnancy (SHOP) presents with flank pain but may include fever, bacteremia, or sepsis that is harmful to the mother and fetus. Current literature focuses on double-J stents (DJS) in SHOP patients with sparse reporting on percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) outcomes. We assess the safety of PCN for SHOP.

Methods

We used CPT codes to identify women with SHOP who underwent PCN at our institution. Gravid women with maternal kidney infection were identified by ICD10 code and selected as a comparative high-risk (HR) group. Retrospective analysis was used to gather data on initial clinical presentation and demographics. Outcomes included fetal data, APGAR scores, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. The number of procedures a mother underwent involving all PCN placements and subsequent changes, along with total procedural radiation dose measured in milligray (mGy), was collected. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess significance.

Results

HR (n = 43) and SHOP (n = 44) groups included a similar number of patients. No statistical differences were noted between groups regarding BMI, body temperature, creatinine, and CBC. No differences were noted in maternal or fetal outcomes between groups. The average patient had 4.6 procedures with mean and median radiation exposure of 108 mGy and 58.2 mGy, respectively.

Conclusion

Maternal and fetal outcomes are acceptable with PCN placement and demonstrate non-inferiority to comparative HR pregnancy groups. PCN is a reasonable option for patients requiring intervention for SHOP. Further studies should consider randomization between treatment modalities to better identify the optimal treatment for women with SHOP.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Drago JR, Rohner TJ, Chez RA. Management of urinary calculi in pregnancy. Urology. 1982;20(6):559–677.CrossRef Drago JR, Rohner TJ, Chez RA. Management of urinary calculi in pregnancy. Urology. 1982;20(6):559–677.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hendricks SK, Ross SO, Krieger JN. An algorithm for diagnosis and therapy of management and complications of urolithiasis during pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;172(1):49–54.PubMed Hendricks SK, Ross SO, Krieger JN. An algorithm for diagnosis and therapy of management and complications of urolithiasis during pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;172(1):49–54.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Shokeir AA, Mahran MR, Abdulmaaboud M. Renal colic in pregnant women: role of renal resistive index. Urology. 2000;55(3):344–7.CrossRefPubMed Shokeir AA, Mahran MR, Abdulmaaboud M. Renal colic in pregnant women: role of renal resistive index. Urology. 2000;55(3):344–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pearle MS, Pierce HL, Miller GL, et al. Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1998;160(4):1260–4.CrossRefPubMed Pearle MS, Pierce HL, Miller GL, et al. Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1998;160(4):1260–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes for Mothers with Symptomatic Hydronephrosis of Pregnancy Managed with Percutaneous Nephrostomy with Comparison High-Risk Pregnancy Group
Authors
Mark Arthur
Joshua Schammel, MD
David Kozminski, MD
Kim Williams, MBA
Paul Feustel, PhD
Christopher Stark, MD
Lawrence Keating, MD
Gary Siskin, MD
Allen Herr, MD
Charles Welliver, MD
Publication date
05-02-2024
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01930-0