Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Neck Pain | Study protocol

The comparison between the effects of pain education interventions with online and face-to-face exercise and the control group received biomedical education + standardized physical therapy in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain during COVID-19: protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled trial

Authors: Zohre Khosrokiani, Amir Letafatkar, Malihe Hadadnezhad, Yahya Sokhanguei

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Various psychological issues and serious health concerns during the imposed lockdown by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have induced many changes in the treatment of patients. More effective self-management strategies through tele-rehabilitation are suggested to be applied for patients with chronic neck pain to reduce referrals to health cares and disability support through COVID-19. Also, the pain neuroscience education (PNE) approach is an educational method used by health professionals to assist patients in understanding the biology, physiology, and psychosocial factors affecting their pain experience and aligning with the cognitions and beliefs associated with pain and recurrent disability. PNE combined with tele-rehabilitation could be a new solution to encourage patients to manage their condition by themselves and increase the continuity of practice instead of face-to-face sessions.

Objective

This randomized control trial (RCT) aims to investigate the effects of PNE with online and face-to-face exercise interventions, and the control group received biomedical education + standardized physical therapy on neck pain and disability, psychological factors, and function in non-traumatic chronic neck pain.

Methods/design

Patients with non-traumatic chronic neck pain (patient-centered care and active involvement of patients and the public) will be recruited via flyers displayed in hospitals and universities to participate in an RCT with two experimental and one control group designed to investigate the effects of PNE with online and face-to-face exercise interventions, and the control group received biomedical education + standardized physical therapy on neck pain and disability, psychological factors, and function in non-traumatic chronic neck pain. The outcomes will be measured at baseline, after PNE, and after 3 months of an exercise intervention. All outcomes are presented as mean ± SD, and statistical significance was set at α level of < 0.05. The normal distribution of the variables was verified by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, following a descriptive analysis.

Discussion

It seems that PNE plus online and face-to-face exercise interventions are appropriate educational models for the treatment of patients with neck pain during COVID-19. Also, online training seems to encourage patients to continue their treatment.

Trial registration

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT20150503022068N5. Registered on 09 September 2021
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Yun S, Kim YL, Lee SM. The effect of neurac training in patients with chronic neck pain. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2015;27(5):1303–7.CrossRef
2.
Rondoni A, Rossettini G, Ristori D, Gallo F, Strobe M, Giaretta F, et al. Intrarater and inter-rater reliability of active cervical range of motion in patients with nonspecific neck pain measured with technological and common use devices: a systematic review with meta-regression. Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017;40(8):597–608.CrossRef
3.
Hoy DG, Protani M, De R, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of neck pain. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2010;24(6):783–92.CrossRef
4.
Childs JD, Clelandt JA, Elliot JM, Teyhen DS, Wainner RS, Whitmam JM, et al. Neck pain: clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;838(9):A34.
5.
Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994. p. 11.
6.
Misailidou V, Malliou P, Beneka A, Karagiannidis A, Godolias G. Assessment of patients with neck pain: a review of definitions, selection criteria, and measurement tools. J Chiropr Med. 2010;9(2):49–59.CrossRef
7.
Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature. 1983;306(5944):686–8.CrossRef
8.
Den Boer C, Dries L, Terluin B, van der Wouden JC, Blankenstein AH, van Wilgen CP, et al. Central sensitization in chronic pain and medically unexplained symptom research: a systematic review of definitions, operationalizations and measurement instruments. J Psychosom Res. 2019;117:32–40.CrossRef
9.
Vlaeyen JWS, Morley S, Crombez G. The experimental analysis of the interruptive, interfering, and identity-distorting effects of chronic pain. Behav Res Ther. 2016;86:23–34.CrossRef
10.
Jiménez-Pavón D, Carbonell-Baeza A, Lavie CJ. Physical exerciseas therapy to fight against the mental and physical consequences of COVID-19 quarantine: special focus in older people. ProgCardiovasc Dis. 2020;24:386–8.CrossRef
11.
Chtourou H, Trabelsi K, H’mida C, Boukhris O, Glenn JM, Brach M, et al. Staying physically active during the quarantine and self-isolation period for controlling and mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic overview of the literature. Front. Psychol. 2020;11:1708.CrossRef
12.
Langer A, Gassner L, Flotz A, et al. How COVID-19 will boost remote exercise-based treatment in Parkinson’s disease: a narrative review. npj Parkinsons Dis. 2021;7:25.CrossRef
13.
Khosrokiani Z, Amir Letafatkar A, Gladin A. Lumbar motor control training as a complementary treatment for chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021;8(5):1–14.
14.
Piccoli A, Rossettini G, Cecchetto S, Viceconti A, Ristori D, Turolla A, et al. Effect of Attentional Focus instructions on motor learning and performance of patients with central nervous system and musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2018;3(3):40.CrossRef
15.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2015; Osteoarthritis (quality standard [QS87] ).
16.
Falsiroli Maistrello L, Zanconato L, Palese A, Geri T, Turolla A, Gianola S, et al. Perceptions and experiences of individuals with neck pain: a systematic critical review of qualitative studies with meta-summary and meta-synthesis. Phys Ther. 2022;102(8):pzac080.CrossRef
17.
Rossettini G, Latini TM, Palese A, Jack SM, Ristori D, Gonzatto S, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction in outpatient musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a systematic, qualitative meta-summary, and meta-synthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(4):460–72.CrossRef
18.
19.
Louw A, Nijs J, Puentedura EJ. A clinical perspective on a pain neuroscience education approach to manual therapy. J Man Manip Ther. 2017;25(3):160–8.CrossRef
20.
Watson JA, Ryan CG, Cooper L, Ellington D, Whittle R, Lavender M, et al. Pain neuroscience education for adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2019;20(10):1140.e1–1140.e22.CrossRef
21.
Malfliet A, Kregel J, Coppieters I, De Pauw R, Meeus M, Roussel N, et al. Effect of pain neuroscience education combined with cognition-targeted motor control training on chronic spinal pain. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(7):808.CrossRef
22.
Andias R, Neto M, Silva AG. The effects of pain neuroscience education and exercise on pain, muscle endurance, catastrophizing and anxiety in adolescents with chronic idiopathic neck pain: a school-based pilot, randomized and controlled study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;34(9):682–91.CrossRef
23.
Richter M, Rauscher C, Kluttig A, Mallwitz J, Delank K-S. Effect of additional pain neuroscience education in interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy on current pain. A non-randomized, controlled intervention study. J. Pain Res. 2020;13:2947–57.CrossRef
24.
Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Diener I, Zimney KJ, Cox T. Pain neuroscience education: which pain neuroscience education metaphor worked best? S. Afr. J. Physiother. 2019;75(1):a1329.CrossRef
25.
Louw A, Diener I, Butler DS, Puentedura EJ. The effect of neuroscience education on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(12):2041–56.CrossRef
26.
Tegner H, Frederiksen P, Esbensen BA, Juhl C. Neurophysiological pain education for patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. J. Pain. 2018;34:778–86.CrossRef
27.
Malfliet A, Kregel J, Meeus M, Roussel N, Danneels L, Cagnie B, et al. Blended-learning pain neuroscience education for people with chronic spinal pain: randomized controlled multicenter trial. Phys Ther. 2018;98(5):357–68.CrossRef
28.
Moseley GL. Evidence for a direct relationship between cognitive and physical change during an education intervention in people with chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain. 2004;8:39–45.CrossRef
29.
Moseley GL. Joining forces: combining cognition-targeted motor control training with group or individual pain physiology education—a successful treatment for chronic low back pain. J Man Manip Ther. 2003;11:88–94.CrossRef
30.
Kloek CJJ, Bossen D, Spreeuwenberg PM, Dekker J, de Bakker DH, Veenhof C. Effectiveness of a blended physical therapist intervention in people with hip osteoarthritis, knee osteoarthritis, or both: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2018;98:56070.CrossRef
31.
Pisters MF, Veenhof C, van Meeteren NLU, Ostelo RW, de Bakker DH, Schellevis FG, et al. Long-term effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1245–53.CrossRef
32.
Mazières B, Thevenon A, Coudeyre E, Chevalier X, Revel M, Rannou F. Adherence to, and results of, physical therapy programs in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Development of French clinical practice guidelines. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75:589–96.CrossRef
33.
Galán-Martín MA, Montero-Cuadrado F, Lluch-Girbes E, Coca-López MC, Mayo-Iscar A, Cuesta-Vargas A. Pain neuroscience education and physical exercise for patients with chronic spinal pain in primary healthcare: a randomised trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2019;20(1).
34.
Glomsrod B, Lonn JH, Soukup MG, Bo K, Larsen S. Active back school, prophylactic management for low back pain: three-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:26–30.CrossRef
35.
Soukup MG, Lonn J, Glomsrod B, Bo K, Larsen S. Exercises and education as secondary prevention for recurrent low back pain. Physiother Res Int. 2001;6:27–39.CrossRef
36.
Falla D. Unravelling the complexity of muscle impairment in chronic neck pain. Manual Therapy. 2004;9:125–33.CrossRef
37.
Rolving N, Christiansen D, Andersen L, Skotte J, Ylinen J, Jensen O, et al. Effect of strength training in addition to general exercise in the rehabilitation of patients with non-specific neck pain. A randomized clinical trial. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2014;50:617–26.
38.
Chen Y-L, Chen C-C, Hsia P-Y, et al. Relationships of Borg’s RPE 6–20 scale and heart rate in dynamic and static exercises among a sample of young Taiwanese men. Percept Mot Skills. 2013;117(3):971–82.CrossRef
39.
Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163–70.CrossRef
40.
Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(7):491–502.CrossRef
41.
Caldwell C, Sahrmann S, Van Dillen L. Use of a movement system impairment diagnosis for physical therapy in the management of a patient with shoulder pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(9):551–63.CrossRef
42.
Bobos P, MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Gross A, Santaguida PL. Patient-reported outcome measures used for neck disorders: an overview of systematic reviews. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(10):775–88.CrossRef
43.
Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Montazeri A, Mehdian H, Karimi A, Abedi M, et al. Translation and validation study of the Iranian versions of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine. 2007;32(26):E825–E31.CrossRef
44.
Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Boyles RE, Whitman JM, Childs JD. Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine J. 2009;9(10):802–8.CrossRef
45.
Jenkins LC, Chang WJ, Buscemi V, Liston M, Toson B, Nicholas M, et al. Do sensorimotor cortex activity, an individual’s capacity for neuroplasticity, and psychological features during an episode of acute low back pain predict outcome at 6 months: a protocol for an Australian, multisite prospective, longitudinal cohort study. BMJ open. 2019;9(5):e029027.CrossRef
46.
Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(2):153–63.CrossRef
47.
Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol Assess. 1998;10(2):176.CrossRef
48.
Parkitny L, McAuley JH, Walton D, Costa LOP, Refshauge KM, Wand BM, et al. Rasch analysis supports the use of the depression, anxiety, and stress scales to measure mood in groups but not in individuals with chronic low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(2):189–98.CrossRef
49.
Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33:335–43.CrossRef
50.
Akin A, Cetin B. The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS): the study of validity and reliability. Educ Sci Theory Pract. 2007;7:260–8.
51.
Grimmer K. Measuring the endurance capacity of the cervical short flexor muscle group. Aust J Physiother. 1994;40:251–4.CrossRef
52.
Juul T, Langberg H, Enoch F, Søgaard K. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:339.CrossRef
53.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Overview of self-determination theory: an organismic dialectical perspective. In: Deci EL, Ryan RM, editors. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: UOFR; 2002.
54.
Lonsdale C, Hall AM, Williams GC, et al. Communication style and exercise compliance in physiotherapy (CONNECT). A cluster randomized controlled trial to test a theory-based intervention to increase chronic low back pain patients’ adherence to physiotherapists’ recommendations: study rationale, design, and methods. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:104.CrossRef
55.
Malfliet A, Lluch Girbés E, Pecos-Martin D, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Valera-Calero A. The influence of treatment expectations on clinical outcomes and cortisol levels in patients with chronic neck pain: an experimental study. Pain Pract. 2019;19(4):370-381.
56.
Louw A, Sluka KA, Nijs J, Courtney CA, Zimney K. Revisiting the provision of pain neuroscience education: an adjunct intervention for patients, but a primary focus for clinician education. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020:1–12.
57.
58.
Dodakian L, McKenzie AL, Le V, See J, Pearson-Fuhrhop K, Burke Quinlan E, et al. A home-based telerehabilitation program for patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31:923–33.CrossRef
59.
Shukla H, Nair SR, Thakker D. Role of telerehabilitation in patients following total knee arthroplasty: evidence from a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2017;23:339–46.CrossRef
60.
Traeger AC, Lee H, Hübscher M, Skinner IW, Moseley GL, Nicholas MK, et al. Effect of intensive patient education vs placebo patient education on outcomes in patients with acute low back pain. JAMA Neurol. 2018.
61.
Louwab A, Zimney K, Puentedura EJ, Diener I. The efficacy of pain neuroscience education on musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review of the literature. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32:332–55.CrossRef
62.
Louw A, Puentedura EJ. Therapeutic neuroscience education, pain, physiotherapy and the pain neuromatrix. Int J Health Sci. 2014;2:33–45.
Metadata
Title
The comparison between the effects of pain education interventions with online and face-to-face exercise and the control group received biomedical education + standardized physical therapy in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain during COVID-19: protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled trial
Authors
Zohre Khosrokiani
Amir Letafatkar
Malihe Hadadnezhad
Yahya Sokhanguei
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06932-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: study protocol for randomized, controlled, exploratory clinical trial

Study protocol

Enriched enrollment randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial with phenytoin cream in painful chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (EPHENE): a study protocol

Study protocol

The FEED1 trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of full milk feeds versus intravenous fluids with gradual feeding for preterm infants (30–33 weeks gestational age)

Study protocol

Atorvastatin for reduction of 28-day mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial

Study protocol

Increasing the effectiveness of psychotherapy in routine care through blended therapy with transdiagnostic online modules (PsyTOM): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

A multicomponent family support intervention in intensive care units: study protocol for a multicenter cluster-randomized trial (FICUS Trial)