Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Neck Pain | Original Article

Comparison of cervical sagittal parameters among patients with neck pain and healthy controls: a comparative cross-sectional study

Authors: Morteza Faghih Jouibari, Jean Charles Le Huec, Mohammad Hosein Ranjbar Hameghavandi, Navid Moghadam, Farzin Farahbakhsh, Masoud Khadivi, Mohsen Rostami, Ramin Kordi

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Previous studies have shown poor health-related outcomes among patients with spinal sagittal malalignment of the thoracolumbar or spinopelvic region, and less interest has been paid to the relationship between cervical sagittal balance and functional outcome of the patients. This study aims to compare the cervical sagittal parameters between patients with non-specific neck pain and asymptomatic controls.

Method

Twenty-five patients (21 females/4 males) with non-specific neck pain and 25 age-, sex- and BMI-matched controls (18 females/7 males) participated in the study. Using a standard lateral cervical radiography, the Cobb angle between occiput–C2, C1–C2, C1–C7 and C2–C7 as well as the thoracic inlet angle (TIA) and C7 and T1 slope angles was measured. Also the spine cranial angle (SCA) and the C2–SVA (sacral vertical axis) and C1–SVA were measured. The primary outcome measure of the study was comparison of the sagittal balance variables between the patients and the healthy controls. Secondary outcome measures were correlation between pain intensity of the patients in neck pain group and their demographic and radiographic findings. Data analysis was performed using independent sample T test and Pearson’s correlation for primary and secondary outcome measurements, respectively.

Results

There was no difference in cervical lordosis curvature (measured by C2–C7 and C1–C7 lordosis angle) between patients with non-specific NP and healthy controls (P value = 0.45 and 0.37, respectively). We found that T1 slope angle was significantly (P value = 0.02) lower in patients with neck pain.

Conclusion

Our findings showed that the slope of the upper endplate of T1 vertebrae body (T1 slope) is significantly lower among patients with non-specific neck pain compared to controls. A compensatory mechanism to bring the center of head gravity back to the spinal axis might be the possible explanation for this difference.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
7.
go back to reference Gore DR (2001) Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a ten-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2463–2466CrossRef Gore DR (2001) Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a ten-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2463–2466CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fujiwara H, Oda T, Makino T, Moriguchi Y, Yonenobu K, Kaito T (2018) Impact of cervical sagittal alignment on axial neck pain and health-related quality of life after cervical laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study. Clin Spine Surg 31:E245–E251. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000619 CrossRefPubMed Fujiwara H, Oda T, Makino T, Moriguchi Y, Yonenobu K, Kaito T (2018) Impact of cervical sagittal alignment on axial neck pain and health-related quality of life after cervical laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study. Clin Spine Surg 31:E245–E251. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​bsd.​0000000000000619​ CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Guzman J, Hurwitz EL, Carroll LJ, Haldeman S, Côté P, Carragee EJ, Peloso PM, van der Velde G, Holm LW, Hogg-Johnson S, Nordin M, Cassidy JD (2008) A new conceptual model of neck pain: linking onset, course, and care: the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine 33:S14–S23. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643efb CrossRefPubMed Guzman J, Hurwitz EL, Carroll LJ, Haldeman S, Côté P, Carragee EJ, Peloso PM, van der Velde G, Holm LW, Hogg-Johnson S, Nordin M, Cassidy JD (2008) A new conceptual model of neck pain: linking onset, course, and care: the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine 33:S14–S23. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181643efb​ CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20:1351–1358CrossRefPubMed Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20:1351–1358CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Gay RE (1993) The curve of the cervical spine: variations and significance. J Manip Physiol Ther 16:591–594 Gay RE (1993) The curve of the cervical spine: variations and significance. J Manip Physiol Ther 16:591–594
32.
go back to reference Panjabi MM, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, Grauer J, Babat LB, Dvorak J (1998) Critical load of the human cervical spine: an in vitro experimental study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 13:11–17CrossRef Panjabi MM, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, Grauer J, Babat LB, Dvorak J (1998) Critical load of the human cervical spine: an in vitro experimental study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 13:11–17CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of cervical sagittal parameters among patients with neck pain and healthy controls: a comparative cross-sectional study
Authors
Morteza Faghih Jouibari
Jean Charles Le Huec
Mohammad Hosein Ranjbar Hameghavandi
Navid Moghadam
Farzin Farahbakhsh
Masoud Khadivi
Mohsen Rostami
Ramin Kordi
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Neck Pain
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06117-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

European Spine Journal 10/2019 Go to the issue