Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Commentary

Navigating uncharted territory with a borrowed map: lessons from setting up the BATH-OUT-2 randomised controlled trial in adult social care and housing services in English local authorities

Authors: Jennifer McAnuff, Tim Rapley, Leigh Rooney, Phillip Whitehead

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Populations around the world are rapidly ageing and more people are living with multiple long-term conditions. There is an urgent need for evidence about high quality, cost-effective, and integrated systems of health and social care. Health research funders are now also prioritising research in adult social care and wider local authority settings, e.g. housing services.
Developing the evidence base for adult social care should include implementing randomised controlled trials, where appropriate. Within the UK, the clinical trial is the established road map for evaluating interventions in the National Health Service (NHS). However, adult social care and local authorities are relatively uncharted territory for trials. BATH-OUT-2 is one of the first clinical trials currently underway within adult social care and housing adaptations services in six English local authorities. It provides an opportunity to explore how the clinical trial road map fares in these settings.
Whilst setting up BATH-OUT-2, we encountered challenges with securing funding for the trial, lack of non-NHS intervention costs, using research and support costs as intended, gaining approvals, identifying additional trial sites, and including people who lack the mental capacity to provide informed consent. Overall, our experience has been like navigating uncharted territory with a borrowed map. In the UK, the clinical trial road map was developed for medical settings. Its key features are integrated within the NHS landscape but have been largely absent, unfamiliar, inaccessible, or irrelevant in social care and wider local authority terrain. Navigating the set-up of a clinical trial outside the NHS has been a complicated and disorientating journey.
BATH-OUT-2 highlights how local authorities generally and adult social care specifically are a relatively new and certainly different type of setting for trials. Whilst this poses a challenge for conducting trials, it also presents an opportunity to question longstanding assumptions within trials practices, reimagine the conventional clinical trial road map, and take it in new directions. As the UK research landscape moves forward and becomes better primed for randomised evaluations in local authorities, we propose several suggestions for building on recent progress and advancing trials within adult social care and across health and care systems.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel JP, et al. The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet. 2016;387(10033):2145–54.CrossRefPubMed Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel JP, et al. The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet. 2016;387(10033):2145–54.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Welch V, Mathew CM, Babelmorad P, Li Y, Ghogomu ET, Borg J, et al. Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: an evidence and gap map. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021;17(3):e1175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Welch V, Mathew CM, Babelmorad P, Li Y, Ghogomu ET, Borg J, et al. Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: an evidence and gap map. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021;17(3):e1175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Dawson S, Kunonga P, Beyer F et al. Does health and social care provision for the community dwelling older population help to reduce unplanned secondary care, support timely discharge and improve patient well-being? A mixed method meta-review of systematic reviews [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research. 2020;9:857. Dawson S, Kunonga P, Beyer F et al. Does health and social care provision for the community dwelling older population help to reduce unplanned secondary care, support timely discharge and improve patient well-being? A mixed method meta-review of systematic reviews [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research. 2020;9:857.
7.
go back to reference Dickson K, Sutcliffe K, Rees R, Thomas J. Gaps in the evidence on improving social care outcomes: findings from a meta-review of systematic reviews. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(4):1287–303.CrossRefPubMed Dickson K, Sutcliffe K, Rees R, Thomas J. Gaps in the evidence on improving social care outcomes: findings from a meta-review of systematic reviews. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(4):1287–303.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Woods B, Russell I. Randomisation and chance-based designs in social care research. London: School for Social Care Research; 2014. Woods B, Russell I. Randomisation and chance-based designs in social care research. London: School for Social Care Research; 2014.
11.
go back to reference Whitehead PJ, Belshaw S, Brady S, Coleman E, Dean A, Doherty L, et al. Bathing Adaptations in the Homes of Older Adults (BATH-OUT-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial, economic evaluation and process evaluation. Trials (under review). 2023. Whitehead PJ, Belshaw S, Brady S, Coleman E, Dean A, Doherty L, et al. Bathing Adaptations in the Homes of Older Adults (BATH-OUT-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial, economic evaluation and process evaluation. Trials (under review). 2023.
12.
go back to reference Jacques RM, Ahmed R, Harper J, Ranjan A, Saeed I, Simpson RM, et al. Recruitment, consent and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials published in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library (1997–2020). BMJ Open. 2022;12(2):e059230.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jacques RM, Ahmed R, Harper J, Ranjan A, Saeed I, Simpson RM, et al. Recruitment, consent and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials published in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library (1997–2020). BMJ Open. 2022;12(2):e059230.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Mezey G, Robinson F, Campbell R, Gillard S, Macdonald G, Meyer D, et al. Challenges to undertaking randomised trials with looked after children in social care settings. Trials. 2015;16:206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mezey G, Robinson F, Campbell R, Gillard S, Macdonald G, Meyer D, et al. Challenges to undertaking randomised trials with looked after children in social care settings. Trials. 2015;16:206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Golding-Day M, Whitehead P, Radford K, Walker M. Interventions to reduce dependency in bathing in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Golding-Day M, Whitehead P, Radford K, Walker M. Interventions to reduce dependency in bathing in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Whitehead PJ, Golding-Day MR, Belshaw S, Dawson T, James M, Walker MF. Bathing adaptations in the homes of older adults (BATH-OUT): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT). BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1293.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Whitehead PJ, Golding-Day MR, Belshaw S, Dawson T, James M, Walker MF. Bathing adaptations in the homes of older adults (BATH-OUT): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT). BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1293.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference McGee CE, Barlow-Pay M, Vassilev I, Baird J, Fenge L-A, Chase D, et al. Supporting and enabling health research in a local authority (SERLA): an exploratory study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McGee CE, Barlow-Pay M, Vassilev I, Baird J, Fenge L-A, Chase D, et al. Supporting and enabling health research in a local authority (SERLA): an exploratory study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Dalili MN, Blackmore S, Thomas KH. Local authority research systems: a qualitative study to inform the development of a South Gloucestershire Council-wide research system. The Lancet. 2021;398:S37.CrossRef Dalili MN, Blackmore S, Thomas KH. Local authority research systems: a qualitative study to inform the development of a South Gloucestershire Council-wide research system. The Lancet. 2021;398:S37.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Gray J, Samarakoon D, Bate A, McGovern R, Christie A, Sherwood-Parkin R, et al. Research-informed decision making about research capacity and activity within an English local authority: a mixed-methods study. The Lancet. 2021;398:S74.CrossRef Gray J, Samarakoon D, Bate A, McGovern R, Christie A, Sherwood-Parkin R, et al. Research-informed decision making about research capacity and activity within an English local authority: a mixed-methods study. The Lancet. 2021;398:S74.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Homer C, Woodall J, Freeman C, South J, Cooke J, Holliday J, et al. Changing the culture: a qualitative study exploring research capacity in local government. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1341.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Homer C, Woodall J, Freeman C, South J, Cooke J, Holliday J, et al. Changing the culture: a qualitative study exploring research capacity in local government. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1341.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Humble C, Kaner E, Wilton M. Designing and implementing a research infrastructure in Newcastle City Council to maximise the effectiveness and efficiency of local decision making and enable active participation in the North East and North Cumbria Applied Research Collaborative 2020 Available from: https://dev.fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR131781. Humble C, Kaner E, Wilton M. Designing and implementing a research infrastructure in Newcastle City Council to maximise the effectiveness and efficiency of local decision making and enable active participation in the North East and North Cumbria Applied Research Collaborative 2020 Available from: https://​dev.​fundingawards.​nihr.​ac.​uk/​award/​NIHR131781.
34.
go back to reference Shepherd V, Wood F, Griffith R, Sheehan M, Hood K. Protection by exclusion? The (lack of) inclusion of adults who lack capacity to consent to research in clinical trials in the UK. Trials. 2019;20(1):474.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shepherd V, Wood F, Griffith R, Sheehan M, Hood K. Protection by exclusion? The (lack of) inclusion of adults who lack capacity to consent to research in clinical trials in the UK. Trials. 2019;20(1):474.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Shepherd V. An under-represented and underserved population in trials: methodological, structural, and systemic barriers to the inclusion of adults lacking capacity to consent. Trials. 2020;21(1):445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shepherd V. An under-represented and underserved population in trials: methodological, structural, and systemic barriers to the inclusion of adults lacking capacity to consent. Trials. 2020;21(1):445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Shepherd V, Hood K, Wood F. Unpacking the ‘black box of horrendousness’: a qualitative exploration of the barriers and facilitators to conducting trials involving adults lacking capacity to consent. Trials. 2022;23(1):471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shepherd V, Hood K, Wood F. Unpacking the ‘black box of horrendousness’: a qualitative exploration of the barriers and facilitators to conducting trials involving adults lacking capacity to consent. Trials. 2022;23(1):471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales. A user’s manual. 2001;2001:1994. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales. A user’s manual. 2001;2001:1994.
40.
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne JE, C D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical care. 1992:473–83. Ware JE, Sherbourne JE, C D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical care. 1992:473–83.
48.
go back to reference Witham MD, Anderson E, Carroll C, Dark PM, Down K, Hall AS, et al. Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: results from a UK multi-stakeholder process. Trials. 2020;21(1):694.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Witham MD, Anderson E, Carroll C, Dark PM, Down K, Hall AS, et al. Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: results from a UK multi-stakeholder process. Trials. 2020;21(1):694.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Navigating uncharted territory with a borrowed map: lessons from setting up the BATH-OUT-2 randomised controlled trial in adult social care and housing services in English local authorities
Authors
Jennifer McAnuff
Tim Rapley
Leigh Rooney
Phillip Whitehead
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08073-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Trials 1/2024 Go to the issue