Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Retinal Disorders

Navigated laser photocoagulation in patients with non-resolving and chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

Authors: Bert Müller, Janina Tatsios, Jan Klonner, Daniel Pilger, Antonia M. Joussen

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of navigated focal laser photocoagulation in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) and active leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA).

Methods

Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients (age 48 ± 11, m/f = 24/8) with persistent or recurrent CSCR (> 3 months) who received navigated laser photocoagulation (Navilas®) of leaking point(s) between June 2013 and 2016 were included in this retrospective case series. Outcome parameters after 4 weeks and 3 months were the number of patients presenting with complete resolution of subretinal fluid, the volume of subretinal fluid measured on SD-OCT (Spectralis Heidelberg Engineering©), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA/ (Snellen equivalent).

Results

Complete resolution of subretinal fluid was achieved in 17 eyes (50%) after 4 weeks and in 24 eyes (75%) after 3 months with an average number of 1.3 laser procedures (range 1–3). Five eyes displayed a nearly complete resolution with a reduction of over 80% of the subretinal fluid compared to baseline. Three eyes showed no reduction in subretinal fluid. BCVA improved from median 0.58 (range 0.16–1.25) to 0.66 (0.16–1.0) (p = 0.001). The seven patients who had been treated within the central 1 mm of the ETDRS-OCT Grid but outside the avascular foveal zone showed an improvement of BCVA from median 0.6 (range 0.2–1.0) to 0.8 (0.2–1.0). No patient experienced a treatment-induced visual loss.

Conclusions

Laser treatment with Navilas® using eye tracking and FA-based planning is a safe and effective alternative therapy in patients with chronic CSCR.
Literature
11.
12.
go back to reference Robertson DM, Ilstrup D (1983) Direct, indirect, and sham laser photocoagulation in the management of central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 95:457–466CrossRefPubMed Robertson DM, Ilstrup D (1983) Direct, indirect, and sham laser photocoagulation in the management of central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 95:457–466CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mastropasqua L, Di Antonio L, Toto L, Mastropasqua A, Di Iorio A, Carpineto P (2015) Central serous chorioretinopathy treated with navigated retinal laser photocoagulation: visual acuity and retinal sensitivity. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 46:349–354. https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20150323-09 Mastropasqua L, Di Antonio L, Toto L, Mastropasqua A, Di Iorio A, Carpineto P (2015) Central serous chorioretinopathy treated with navigated retinal laser photocoagulation: visual acuity and retinal sensitivity. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 46:349–354. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3928/​23258160-20150323-09
25.
go back to reference Lanzetta P, Furlan F, Morgante L, Veritti D, Bandello F (2008) Nonvisible subthreshold micropulse diode laser (810 nm) treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy. A pilot study. Eur J Ophthalmol 18:934–940CrossRefPubMed Lanzetta P, Furlan F, Morgante L, Veritti D, Bandello F (2008) Nonvisible subthreshold micropulse diode laser (810 nm) treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy. A pilot study. Eur J Ophthalmol 18:934–940CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Yadav NK, Jayadev C, Mohan A, Vijayan P, Battu R, Dabir S, Shetty B, Shetty R (2015) Subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (577 nm) in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: safety profile and treatment outcome. Eye (London, England) 29:258–264; quiz 265. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.315 CrossRef Yadav NK, Jayadev C, Mohan A, Vijayan P, Battu R, Dabir S, Shetty B, Shetty R (2015) Subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (577 nm) in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: safety profile and treatment outcome. Eye (London, England) 29:258–264; quiz 265. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​eye.​2014.​315 CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Russo A, Turano R, Morescalchi F, Gambicorti E, Cancarini A, Duse S, Costagliola C, Semeraro F (2017) Comparison of half-dose photodynamic therapy and 689 nm laser treatment in eyes with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255:1141–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3626-9 Russo A, Turano R, Morescalchi F, Gambicorti E, Cancarini A, Duse S, Costagliola C, Semeraro F (2017) Comparison of half-dose photodynamic therapy and 689 nm laser treatment in eyes with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255:1141–1148. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00417-017-3626-9
28.
go back to reference Manayath GJ, Karandikar SS, Narendran S, Kumarswamy KA, Saravanan VR, Morris RJ, Venkatapathy N (2017) Low fluence photodynamic therapy versus graded subthreshold transpupillary thermotherapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: results from a prospective study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 48:334–338. https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20170329-08 Manayath GJ, Karandikar SS, Narendran S, Kumarswamy KA, Saravanan VR, Morris RJ, Venkatapathy N (2017) Low fluence photodynamic therapy versus graded subthreshold transpupillary thermotherapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: results from a prospective study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 48:334–338. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3928/​23258160-20170329-08
Metadata
Title
Navigated laser photocoagulation in patients with non-resolving and chronic central serous chorioretinopathy
Authors
Bert Müller
Janina Tatsios
Jan Klonner
Daniel Pilger
Antonia M. Joussen
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4031-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2018 Go to the issue