Top

Published in:

01-07-2017

Natural Peer Leaders as Substance Use Prevention Agents: the Teens’ Life Choice Project

Authors: Megan M. Golonka, Kristen F. Peairs, Patrick S. Malone, Christina L. Grimes, Philip R. Costanzo

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 5/2017

Abstract

In adolescent social groups, natural peer leaders have been found to engage in more frequent experimentation with substance use and to possess disproportionate power to affect the behavior and social choices of their associated peer followers. In the current exploratory study, we used sociometrics and social cognitive mapping to identify natural leaders of cliques in a seventh grade population and invited the leaders to develop anti-drug presentations for an audience of younger peers. The program employed social-psychological approaches directed at having leaders proceed from extrinsic inducements to intrinsic identification with their persuasive products in the context of the group intervention process. The goals of the intervention were to induce substance resistant self-persuasion in the leaders and to produce a spread of this resistance effect to their peer followers. To test the intervention, we compared the substance use behaviors of the selected leaders and their peers to a control cohort. The study found preliminary support that the intervention produced changes in the substance use behavior among the leaders who participated in the intervention, but did not detect a spread to non-leader peers in the short term. This descriptive study speaks to the plausibility of employing self-persuasion paradigms to bring about change in high-risk behaviors among highly central adolescents. In addition, it highlights the viability of applying social psychological principles to prevention work and calls for more research in this area.

Alexander, C., Piazza, M., Mekos, D., & Valente, T. (2001). Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 22–30. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00210-5.CrossRefPubMed

Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., McFarland, F. C., Marsh, P., & McElhaney, K. B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents’ success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76, 747–760. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00875.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Arkin, R. M., Roemhild, H., Johnson, C., Luepker, R., & Murray, D. (1981). The Minnesota smoking prevention program: A seventh-grade health curriculum supplement. Journal of School Health, 51, 611–616. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.1981.tb02246.x.CrossRefPubMed

Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. Abelson, W. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. Rosenberg, & P. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A source book. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Bagwell, C. L., Coie, J. D., Terry, R. A., & Lochman, J. E. (2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 280–305.

Botvin, G. J. (2000). Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 887–897. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00119-2.CrossRefPubMed

Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., Diaz, T., & Ifill-Williams, M. (2001). Drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Posttest and one-year follow-up of a school-based preventive intervention. Prevention Science, 1, 1–13. doi:10.1023/A:1010025311161.CrossRef

Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166–179. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., & Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521–530. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.521.CrossRef

Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., & Gest, S. D. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection?. Developmental Psychology, 24, 815–823. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.815.

Cairns, R. B., Gariepy, J. L, & Kindermann, T. (1991). Identifying social clusters in natural settings. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Cooper, J. & Aronson, J. (1992). Attitudes and consistency theories: Implications for mental health. In D. N. Ruble, P. R. Costanzo, & M. E. Oliveri, (Eds.). The social psychology of mental health: Basic mechanisms and applications. New York: Guilford, 279–300.

Costanzo, P. R., & Shaw, M. E. (1966). Conformity as a function of age level. Child Development, 37, 967–965. doi:10.2307/1126618.CrossRef

Costanzo, P. R., Lansford, J. E., Polanichka, N., Chu, R., & Arrington, K. (2005, May). Factors that differentiate deviant and conventional leaders of adolescent peer groups: Implications for drug use prevention efforts. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, DC.

Cuijpers, P. (2002). Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs: A systematic review. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 1009–1023. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00295-2.CrossRefPubMed

De Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 607–627. doi:10.1177/0743558406293966.CrossRef

DeRosier, M., & Thomas, J. M. (2003). Strengthening sociometric prediction: Scientific advances in the assessment of children’s peer relations. Child Development, 75, 1379–1392. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00613.

Dishion, T. J., & Dodge, K. A. (2005). Peer contagion in interventions for children and adolescents: Moving towards an understanding of the ecology and dynamics of change. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 395–400. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-3579-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Donaldson, S. I., Sussman, S., MacKinnon, D. P., Severson, H. H., Glynn, T., Murray, D. M., & Stone, E. J. (1996). Drug abuse prevention programming: Do we know what content works? American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 868–883. doi:10.1177/0002764296039007008.CrossRef

Eagley, A. E., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc..

Ellis, W. E. & Zarbatany, L. (2007). Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children’s deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 78, 1240–1254. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01063.x.

Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., & Koch, G. C. (1994). Variability in cigarette smoking within and between adolescent friendship cliques. Addictive Behaviors, 19, 295–305. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(94)90031-0.CrossRefPubMed

Gottfredson, D. C., & Wilson, D. B. (2003). Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prevention Science, 4, 27–38. doi:10.1023/A:1021782710278.CrossRefPubMed

Harrison, P. A., Fulkerson, J. A., & Park, E. (2000). The relative importance of social versus commercial sources in youth access to tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs. Preventive Medicine, 31, 39–48. doi:10.1006/pmed.2000.0691.CrossRefPubMed

Hollingshead, A. A. (1975). Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Miech, R. A., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2014). Monitoring the future national results on drug use: 1975–2013: Key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Kandel, D. B., & Adler, I. (1982). Socialization into marijuana use among French adolescents: a cross-cultural comparison with the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 295–309. doi:10.2307/2136488.

Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57–78. doi:10.1086/266996.CrossRef

Lynam, D. R., Milich, R., Zimmerman, R., Novak, S. P., Logan, T. K., Martin, C., Leukefeld, C., & Clayton, R. (1999). Project DARE: No effects at 10-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 590–593. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.4.590.CrossRefPubMed

Miller-Johnson, S., & Costanzo, P. (2004). If you can't beat 'em...Induce them to join you: Peer- based interventions during adolescence. In J. B. Kupersmidt & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Children's peer relations from development to intervention: Decade of behavior (pp. 209–222). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Miller-Johnson, S., Costanzo, P. R., Coie, J. D., Rose, M. R., Browne, D. C., & Johnson, C. (2003). Peer social structure and risk-taking behaviors among African American early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 375–384. doi:10.1023/A:1024926132419.CrossRef

Nel, E., Helmreich, R., & Aronson, E. (1969). Opinion change in the advocate as a function of the persuasibility of his audience: A clarification of the meaning of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 117–124. doi:10.1037/h0027566.

Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H., & Aronow, P. M. (2016). Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools. PNAS Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America, 113, 566–571. doi:10.1073/pnas.1514483113.

Perry, C. L., Williams, C. L., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Toomey, T. L., Komro, K., Anstine, P., McGovern, P. G., Finnegan, J. R., Forster, J. L., Wagenaar, A. C., & Wolfson, M. (1996). Project northland: Outcomes of a community wide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 956–965. doi:10.2105/AJPH.86.7.956.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown.

Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.609.CrossRefPubMed

Price, R. H., Gioci, M., Penner, W., & Trautlein, B. (1993). Webs of influence: School and community programs that enhance adolescent health and education. In R. Takanishi (Ed.), Adolescence in the 1990’s: Risk and opportunity (pp. 29–63). New York: Teachers College Press.

Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14–24. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.14.CrossRefPubMed

Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Stice, E. C., Marti, N., Spoor, S., Presnell, K., & Shaw, H. (2008). Dissonance and healthy weight eating disorder prevention programs: Long-term effects from a randomized efficacy. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 76, 329–340. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.76.2.329.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Stice, E., Butryn, M. L., Rohde, P., Shaw, H., & Marti, C. N. (2013). An effectiveness trial of a new enhanced dissonance eating disorder prevention program among female college students. Behavior Research Therapy, 51, 862–871. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2013.10.003.CrossRef

Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D. G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. Journal of Primary Prevention, 4, 275–336. doi:10.1023/A:1021314704811.CrossRef

Tucker, J. S., Miles, J. N. V., D’Amico, E. J., Zhou, A. J., Green, H. D., & Shih, R. A. (2013). Temporal associations of popularity and alcohol use among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 108–115. doi:10.1016/j.adohealth.2012.04.012.CrossRefPubMed

Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., & Pilgrim, C. (1997). Close friend and group influence adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Developmental Psychology, 33, 834–844. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.5.834.CrossRefPubMed

Valente, T. W., Hoffman, B. R., Ritt-Olson, A., Lichtman, K., & Johnson, C. A. (2003). Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1837–1843. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.11.1837.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Valente, T. W., Ritt-Olson, A., Stacy, A., Unger, J. B., Okamoto, J., & Sussman, S. (2007). Peer acceleration: effects of a social network tailored substance use prevention program among high-risk adolescents. Addiction, 102, 1804–1815. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01992.x.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Natural Peer Leaders as Substance Use Prevention Agents: the Teens’ Life Choice Project
Authors: Megan M. Golonka
Kristen F. Peairs
Patrick S. Malone
Christina L. Grimes
Philip R. Costanzo
Publication date: 01-07-2017
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Prevention Science / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0790-4

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Natural Peer Leaders as Substance Use Prevention Agents: the Teens’ Life Choice Project

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Exploration of Pathways to Binge Drinking Among American Indian Adolescents

Pathways to Preventing Substance Use Among Youth in Foster Care

Retention of South African Adolescents in a 54-Month Longitudinal HIV Risk Reduction Trial

Long-Term Sustainability of Evidence-Based Prevention Interventions and Community Coalitions Survival: a Five and One-Half Year Follow-up Study

A Multi-US City Assessment of Awareness and Uptake of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention Among Black Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex with Men

The Charlie Sheen Effect on Rapid In-home Human Immunodeficiency Virus Test Sales