Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2008

01-09-2008 | Current Opinion/Update

Natural orifice hysterectomy

Authors: Michael D. Moen, Michael B. Noone, Denise M. Elser, for the Urogynecology Network

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 9/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) such as natural orifice surgery is perceived as a relatively recent development partly because many MIS techniques utilize new technology and devices. However, a natural orifice/MIS approach for hysterectomy (vaginal hysterectomy, VH) has existed for over a century. VH is typically thought of in the realm of the urogynecologist as a component of reconstructive pelvic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. However, current evidence supports the use of VH in women with other benign conditions such as uterine fibroids and abnormal bleeding. Despite the evidence and availability of several MIS options for hysterectomy, the majority of hysterectomies continue to be performed via laparotomy. VH is the least invasive approach to hysterectomy, and its use should be encouraged as the preferred MIS option for women requiring uterine removal for benign conditions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA et al (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60(1):114–117PubMedCrossRef Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA et al (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60(1):114–117PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, Mofid H (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 39(10):913–915PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, Mofid H (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 39(10):913–915PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Olsson JH, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M (1996) A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103(4):345–350PubMed Olsson JH, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M (1996) A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103(4):345–350PubMed
4.
go back to reference Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E, Garcea N, Paparella P, Catalano GF (1990) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(2 Pt 1):270–275 Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E, Garcea N, Paparella P, Catalano GF (1990) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(2 Pt 1):270–275
5.
go back to reference Falcone T, Paraiso MF, Mascha E (1999) Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(4):955–962PubMedCrossRef Falcone T, Paraiso MF, Mascha E (1999) Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(4):955–962PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Summitt RL Jr, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW (1992) Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol 80(6):895–901PubMed Summitt RL Jr, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW (1992) Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol 80(6):895–901PubMed
7.
go back to reference Richardson RE, Bournas N, Magos AL (1995) Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time? Lancet 345(8941):36–41PubMedCrossRef Richardson RE, Bournas N, Magos AL (1995) Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time? Lancet 345(8941):36–41PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sculpher M, Manca A, Abbott J, Fountain J, Mason S, Garry R (2004) Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial. BMJ 328(7432):134PubMedCrossRef Sculpher M, Manca A, Abbott J, Fountain J, Mason S, Garry R (2004) Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial. BMJ 328(7432):134PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Abdelmonem A, Wilson H, Pasic R (2006) Observational comparison of abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy as performed at a university teaching hospital. J Reprod Med 51(12):945–954PubMed Abdelmonem A, Wilson H, Pasic R (2006) Observational comparison of abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy as performed at a university teaching hospital. J Reprod Med 51(12):945–954PubMed
10.
go back to reference Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R (2006) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 2. Art No.:CD003677, DOI 10.1002/14651858. CD003677.pub3 Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R (2006) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 2. Art No.:CD003677, DOI 10.​1002/​14651858.​ CD003677.​pub3
11.
go back to reference Farquhar CM, Steiner CA (2002) Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997. Obstet Gynecol 99(2):229–234PubMedCrossRef Farquhar CM, Steiner CA (2002) Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997. Obstet Gynecol 99(2):229–234PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jacobson GF, Shaber RE, Armstrong MA, Hung YY (2006) Hysterectomy rates for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1278–1283PubMed Jacobson GF, Shaber RE, Armstrong MA, Hung YY (2006) Hysterectomy rates for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1278–1283PubMed
13.
go back to reference Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG (2007) Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 110(5):1091–1095PubMed Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG (2007) Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 110(5):1091–1095PubMed
Metadata
Title
Natural orifice hysterectomy
Authors
Michael D. Moen
Michael B. Noone
Denise M. Elser
for the Urogynecology Network
Publication date
01-09-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0659-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2008

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2008 Go to the issue